Carbon capture and storage: Fundamental thermodynamics and current technology

Carbon capture and storage (CCS) is considered a leading technology for reducing CO2 emissions from fossil-fuelled electricity generation plants and could permit the continued use of coal and gas whilst meeting greenhouse gas targets. However considerable energy is required for the capture, compression, transport and storage steps involved. In this paper, energy penalty information in the literature is reviewed, and thermodynamically ideal and "real world" energy penalty values are calculated. For a sub-critical pulverized coal (PC) plant, the energy penalty values for 100% capture are 48.6% and 43.5% for liquefied CO2, and for CO2 compressed to 11Â MPa, respectively. When assumptions for supercritical plants were incorporated, results were in broad agreement with published values arising from process modelling. However, we show that energy use in existing capture operations is considerably greater than indicated by most projections. Full CCS demonstration plants are now required to verify modelled energy penalty values. However, it appears unlikely that CCS will deliver significant CO2 reductions in a timely fashion. In addition, many uncertainties remain over the permanence of CO2 storage, either in geological formations, or beneath the ocean. We conclude that further investment in CCS should be seriously questioned by policy makers.

[1]  C. A. Roberts,et al.  Potential for improvement in power generation with post-combustion capture of CO2 , 2005 .

[2]  N. Stern What is the Economics of Climate Change , 2006 .

[3]  Edward S Rubin,et al.  A technical, economic, and environmental assessment of amine-based CO2 capture technology for power plant greenhouse gas control. , 2002, Environmental science & technology.

[4]  F. William Payne Cogeneration management reference guide , 1997 .

[5]  Tomio Mimura,et al.  Research and development on energy saving technology for flue gas carbon dioxide recovery and steam system in power plant , 1995 .

[6]  Ian G. Bywater,et al.  New Zealand Energy Information Handbook , 2008 .

[7]  Edward S. Rubin,et al.  Comparative assessments of fossil fuel power plants with CO2 capture and storage , 2005 .

[8]  Edward S. Rubin,et al.  Towards fossil-based electricity systems with integrated CO2 capture: Implications of an illustrative long-term technology policy , 2005 .

[9]  M. Steinberg History of CO2 greenhouse gas mitigation technologies , 1992 .

[10]  Masaki Iijima,et al.  Development of energy saving technology for flue gas carbon dioxide recovery in power plant by chemical absorption method and steam system , 1997 .

[11]  Aie World Energy Outlook 2007 , 2007 .

[12]  Alexander Wokaun,et al.  Greenhouse Gas Control Technologies , 1999 .

[13]  R Pruschek,et al.  Comparison of CO2 removal systems for fossil-fuelled power plant processes , 1997 .

[14]  Vice President,et al.  AMERICAN SOCIETY OF HEATING, REFRIGERATION AND AIR CONDITIONING ENGINEERS INC. , 2007 .

[15]  T. Findlay,et al.  SI Chemical Data , 1971 .

[16]  B. Metz IPCC special report on carbon dioxide capture and storage , 2005 .

[17]  John Davison,et al.  Technologies for capture of carbon dioxide , 2005 .

[18]  Charles P. Auger,et al.  Information sources in grey literature , 1989 .

[19]  Jon Gibbins,et al.  Scope for reductions in the cost of CO2 capture using flue gas scrubbing with amine solvents , 2004 .

[20]  George Monbiot,et al.  Heat: How to Stop the Planet Burning , 2007 .

[21]  Nicholas Stern,et al.  KEY ELEMENTS OF A GLOBAL DEAL ON CLIMATE CHANGE , 2008 .

[22]  Olav Juliussen,et al.  Carbon dioxide recovery by means of aqueous amines , 1995 .

[23]  G. Saville,et al.  Thermodynamics for chemical engineers , 1975 .

[24]  Jon Gibbins,et al.  Oxy-combustion processes for CO2 capture from advanced supercritical PF and NGCC power plant , 2005 .

[25]  Edward S. Rubin,et al.  Cost and performance of fossil fuel power plants with CO2 capture and storage , 2007 .

[26]  Jon Gibbins,et al.  Maximising the effectiveness of post combustion CO2 capture systems , 2005 .

[27]  S. Schneider,et al.  Climate Change 2007 Synthesis report , 2008 .

[28]  Paul Clark,et al.  Canadian Clean Power Coalition: The evaluation of options for CO2 capture from existing & new coal-fired power plants , 2005 .

[29]  Eli Kintisch Making Dirty Coal Plants Cleaner , 2007, Science.

[30]  Rick Chalaturnyk,et al.  IEA GHG Weyburn CO2 monitoring and storage project , 2005 .