An attribute-based approach to contingent valuation of forest protection programs

[1]  P. Debach,et al.  Biological control of insect pests and weeds , 1967 .

[2]  J. G. Cragg.  Some Statistical Models for Limited Dependent Variables with Application to the Demand for Durable Goods , 1971 .

[3]  J. Heckman.  Sample selection bias as a specification error , 1979 .

[4]  I. Krinsky,et al.  On Approximating the Statistical Properties of Elasticities , 1986 .

[5]  Trudy Ann Cameron,et al.  OLS versus ML estimation of non-market resource values with payment card interval data , 1989 .

[6]  W. Michael Hanemann,et al.  Statistical Efficiency of Double-Bounded Dichotomous Choice Contingent Valuation , 1991 .

[7]  Daniel A. Haqen,et al.  BENEFITS OF PRESERVING OLD‐GROWTH FORESTS AND THE SPOTTED OWL , 1992 .

[8]  Robin Gregory,et al.  Do Reminders of Substitutes and Budget Constraints Influence Contingent Valuation Estimates , 1994 .

[9]  J. Louviere,et al.  Stated Preference Approaches for Measuring Passive Use Values: Choice Experiments and Contingent Valuation , 1998 .

[10]  Victor C. Mastro,et al.  Invasion by Exotic Forest Pests: A Threat to Forest Ecosystems , 1995 .

[11]  Jordan J. Louviere,et al.  A comparison of stated preference methods for environmental valuation , 1996 .

[12]  William D. Schulze,et al.  A Test for Payment Card Biases , 1996 .

[13]  Richard C. Bishop,et al.  Which Response Format Reveals the Truth about Donations to a Public Good , 1996 .

[14]  K. Rollins,et al.  The Case for Diminishing Marginal Existence Values , 1998 .

[15]  L. Mattsson,et al.  Recreation values of boreal forest stand types and landscapes resulting from different silvicultural systems: an economic analysis. , 2000 .

[16]  J. Payne,et al.  Valuation of Multiple Environmental Programs , 2000 .

[17]  Laura O. Taylor,et al.  Do As You Say, Say As You Do: Evidence On Gender Differences In Actual And Stated Contributions To Public Goods , 2000 .

[18]  Richard T. Carson,et al.  Incentive and informational properties of preference questions , 2007 .

[19]  Frank Asche,et al.  MEASURING CONSUMER PREFERENCES FOR ECOLABELED SEAFOOD: AN INTERNATIONAL COMPARISON , 2001 .

[20]  D. Orwig,et al.  Hemlock Woolly Adelgid , 2019 .

[21]  G. Amacher,et al.  Valuing high altitude spruce-fir forest improvements: importance of forest condition and recreation activity , 2002 .

[22]  D. Foster,et al.  Direct and indirect ecosystem consequences of an invasive pest on forests dominated by eastern hemlock , 2002 .

[23]  Michael P. Welsh,et al.  Testing Bid Design Effects in Multiple-Bounded, Contingent-Valuation Questions , 2002, Land Economics.

[24]  Thomas C. Brown,et al.  A primer on nonmarket valuation , 2003 .

[25]  John A. Young,et al.  Influence of eastern hemlock (Tsuga canadensis L.) on fish community structure and function in headwater streams of the Delaware River basin , 2003 .

[26]  Kevin J. Boyle,et al.  Contingent Valuation in Practice , 2003 .

[27]  E. Pouta,et al.  Non-market benefits of forest conservation in southern Finland , 2003 .

[28]  Thomas P. Holmes,et al.  Attribute-Based Methods , 2003 .

[29]  Bill Provencher,et al.  Does accounting for preference heterogeneity improve the forecasting of a random utility model? A case study , 2004 .

[30]  A. Watson,et al.  Science and stewardship to protect and sustain wilderness values: Eighth World Wilderness Congress symposium , 2005 .

[31]  D. Foster,et al.  Preemptive and Salvage Harvesting of New England Forests: When Doing Nothing Is a Viable Alternative , 2006, Conservation biology : the journal of the Society for Conservation Biology.

[32]  N. Hanley,et al.  Contingent valuation: Environmental polling or preference engine? , 2006 .

[33]  Jeffrey Bennett,et al.  A comparison of contingent valuation and choice modelling with second-order interactions , 2006 .

[34]  D. Patterson,et al.  Field testing existence values for riparian ecosystems , 2007 .

[35]  Jennifer A. Thacher,et al.  Relating environmental attitudes and contingent values: how robust are methods for identifying preference heterogeneity? , 2007 .

[36]  L. Kok,et al.  Establishment of Laricobius nigrinus (Coleoptera: Derodontidae) for biological control of hemlock woolly adelgid , 2007 .

[37]  K. Bell,et al.  Economic Aspects of Invasive Forest Pest Management , 2008 .

[38]  Jeffrey P. Prestemon,et al.  The Economics of Forest Disturbances , 2008 .

[39]  M. Ryan,et al.  Comparing welfare estimates from payment card contingent valuation and discrete choice experiments. , 2009, Health economics.

[40]  C. Donaldson,et al.  The impact of information on patient preferences in different delivery patterns: a contingent valuation study of prescription versus OTC drugs. , 2009, Health policy.

[41]  R. Cowles.  Optimizing dosage and preventing leaching of imidacloprid for management of hemlock woolly adelgid in forests. , 2009 .

[42]  Zewen Liu,et al.  Imidacloprid resistance and its mechanisms in field populations of brown planthopper, Nilaparvata lugens Stål in China. , 2009 .

[43]  Maria L. Loureiro,et al.  A meta-analysis of contingent valuation forest studies , 2010 .