Limiting performance analysis of a seat belt system with slack

A limiting performance analysis is presented to determine the theoretically optimal control force-time profile generated by a vehicle restraint system, with slack represented as a system delay. Three established injury thresholds (chest acceleration, chest compression rate, and the viscous criterion) and the interior geometry of the vehicle, which defines the system rattlespace, serve as constraints in the analysis. A fourth injury criterion, maximum chest compression, is the performance metric minimized subject to those constraints. Single- and multiple-degree-of-freedom (D.O.F.) models are used, and the limiting performance equations are developed and solved analytically (single-D.O.F.) or numerically (multiple-D.O.F.). Regardless of the magnitude of the system delay, all control forces found with the multiple-D.O.F. model exhibit a short-duration period of high magnitude early in the profile, followed by an interval of nearly constant force. The peak magnitude of the restraining force decreases monotonically with slack, as do all of the injury criteria considered here. Most importantly from the standpoint of restraint system design, this limiting performance analysis shows that the benefits to be gained by pretensioning the belt system are largest over the performance range of current pretensioner technology. Continued refinement in pretensioner response time, through the use of improved crash sensors or faster-acting algorithms, will have a positive effect by reducing injury risk, but the effect should not be expected to be as pronounced as that already realized.

[1]  Stephen W Rouhana,et al.  Biomechanics of 4-point seat belt systems in frontal impacts. , 2003, Stapp car crash journal.

[2]  Greg Shaw,et al.  The Utility of Hybrid III and THOR Chest Deflection for Discriminating Between Standard and Force-Limiting Belt Systems. , 2003, Stapp car crash journal.

[3]  Dieter Adomeit,et al.  ITEMS OF AN ENGINEERING PROGRAM ON AN ADVANCED WEB-CLAMP DEVICE. RESTRAINT TECHNOLOGIES: FRONT SEAT OCCUPANT PROTECTION. AN INTERNATIONAL CONGRESS AND EXPOSITION, DETROIT, MICHIGAN, USA, FEBRUARY 23-27, 1987 , 1987 .

[4]  Zhiqing Cheng,et al.  Limiting performance of seat belt systems for the prevention of thoracic injuries , 2000 .

[5]  Yuichi Kitagawa,et al.  Muscle Tetanus and Loading Condition Effects on the Elastic and Viscous Characteristics of the Thorax , 2003, Traffic injury prevention.

[6]  Dmitry V. Balandin,et al.  Optimal protection from impact, shock and vibration , 2001 .

[7]  Xavier Trosseille,et al.  Laboratory Reconstructions of Real World Frontal Crash Configurations using the Hybrid III and THOR Dummies and PMHS. , 2002, Stapp car crash journal.

[8]  Jeffrey Richard Crandall,et al.  Thoracic response and injury with belt, driver side airbag, and force limited belt restraint systems , 1996 .

[9]  Ola Boström,et al.  Benefits of a 3+2 point belt system and an inboard torso side support in frontal, far-side and rollover crashes , 2003 .

[10]  H G Johannessen,et al.  Why "Intelligent" Automotive Occupant Restraint Systems? , 1995 .

[11]  A R Bernat "SMART" SAFETY BELTS FOR INJURY REDUCTION , 1995 .

[12]  Erik G. Takhounts,et al.  DEVELOPMENT OF IMPROVED INJURY CRITERIA FOR THE ASSESSMENT OF ADVANCED AUTOMOTIVE RESTRAINT SYSTEMS - II , 1999 .

[13]  James Patrie,et al.  The Hybrid III dummy as a discriminator of injurious and non-injurious restraint loading. , 2003, Annual proceedings. Association for the Advancement of Automotive Medicine.

[14]  Richard Kent,et al.  Chest deflection tolerance to blunt anterior loading is sensitive to age but not load distribution. , 2005, Forensic science international.

[15]  F Bendjellal,et al.  Comparison of Thoracic Injury Risk in Frontal Car Crashes for Occupant Restrained without Belt Load Limiters and Those Restrained with 6 kN and 4 kN Belt Load Limiters. , 2001, Stapp car crash journal.

[16]  C. Got,et al.  Thoracic Injury Risk in Frontal Car Crashes with Occupant Restrained with Belt Load Limiter , 1998 .

[17]  C. K. Kroell,et al.  Impact Response of the Human Thorax , 1973 .

[18]  H J Miller,et al.  Injury reduction with smart restraint systems , 1995 .

[19]  S. Andrews Occupant sensing in smart restraint systems , 1995 .

[20]  Yngve Haland,et al.  A MECHANICAL BUCKLE PRETENSIONER TO IMPROVE A THREE POINT SEAT BELT. IN: SEAT BELTS: THE DEVELOPMENT OF AN ESSENTIAL SAFETY FEATURE , 1989 .

[21]  D Viano INTRODUCTION: LAP-SHOULDER BELTS: SOME HISTORICAL ASPECTS. IN: SEAT BELTS: THE DEVELOPMENT OF AN ESSENTIAL SAFETY FEATURE , 2003 .