European Project on Osteoarthritis (EPOSA): methodological challenges in harmonization of existing data from five European population-based cohorts on aging

BackgroundThe European Project on OSteoArthritis (EPOSA), here presented for the first time, is a collaborative study involving five European cohort studies on aging. This project focuses on the personal and societal burden and its determinants of osteoarthritis (OA). The aim of the current report is to describe the purpose of the project, the post harmonization of the cross-national data and methodological challenges related to the harmonization processMethodsThe study includes data from cohort studies in five European countries (Germany, Italy, the Netherlands, Spain and the United Kingdom) on older community-dwelling persons aged ≥ 59 years. The study design and main characteristics of the five cohort studies are described. Post harmonization algorithms are developed by finding a "common denominator" to merge the datasets and weights are calculated to adjust for differences in age and sex distribution across the datasets.ResultsA harmonized database was developed, consisting of merged data from all participating countries. In total, 10107 persons are included in the harmonized dataset with a mean age of 72.8 years (SD 6.1). The female/male ratio is 53.3/46.7%. Some variables were difficult to harmonize due to differences in wording and categories, differences in classifications and absence of data in some countries. The post harmonization algorithms are described in detail in harmonization guidelines attached to this paper.ConclusionsThere was little evidence of agreement on the use of several core data collection instruments, in particular on the measurement of OA. The heterogeneity of OA definitions hampers comparing prevalence rates of OA, but other research questions can be investigated using high quality harmonized data. By publishing the harmonization guidelines, insight is given into (the interpretation of) all post harmonized data of the EPOSA study.

[1]  P. Dieppe,et al.  Pathogenesis and management of pain in osteoarthritis , 2005, The Lancet.

[2]  W. Who.  The burden of musculoskeletal conditions at the start of the new millenium , 2003 .

[3]  W. Murphy,et al.  The American College of Rheumatology criteria for the classification and reporting of osteoarthritis of the hand. , 1990, Arthritis and rheumatism.

[4]  J. Lawrence,et al.  Osteo-Arthrosis: Prevalence in the Population and Relationship between Symptoms and X-ray Changes , 1966 .

[5]  R. Moskowitz,et al.  Development of criteria for the classification and reporting of osteoarthritis. Classification of osteoarthritis of the knee. Diagnostic and Therapeutic Criteria Committee of the American Rheumatism Association. , 1986, Arthritis and rheumatism.

[6]  T D Cooke,et al.  The American College of Rheumatology criteria for the classification and reporting of osteoarthritis of the hip. , 1991, Arthritis and rheumatism.

[7]  A. Hofman,et al.  Recommendations for standardization and phenotype definitions in genetic studies of osteoarthritis: the TREAT-OA consortium. , 2010, Osteoarthritis and cartilage.

[8]  H. Brenner,et al.  Inzidenz und pravalenz der cox- und gonarthrose in der allgemeinbevolkerung , 2008 .

[9]  L. Sharma,et al.  Epidemiology of osteoarthritis: an update , 2006, Current opinion in rheumatology.

[10]  Á. O. Puime,et al.  Prevalencia de fragilidad en una población urbana de mayores de 65 años y su relación con comorbilidad y discapacidad , 2010 .

[11]  C. Cooper,et al.  Cohort profile: the Hertfordshire cohort study. , 2005, International journal of epidemiology.

[12]  S Kirschner,et al.  EULAR evidence-based recommendations for the diagnosis of knee osteoarthritis , 2009, Annals of the rheumatic diseases.

[13]  Peter E. Hilsenrath,et al.  The World Health Report 2000 , 2002 .

[14]  P. Brooks.  Impact of osteoarthritis on individuals and society: how much disability? Social consequences and health economic implications. , 2002, Current opinion in rheumatology.

[15]  M. Doherty,et al.  Guidelines for management of osteoarthritis published by the American College of Rheumatology and the European League Against Rheumatism: why are they so different? , 2003, Rheumatic diseases clinics of North America.

[16]  Scott M Hofer,et al.  Integrative data analysis through coordination of measurement and analysis protocol across independent longitudinal studies. , 2009, Psychological methods.

[17]  S B Thacker,et al.  Methods for pooled analyses of epidemiologic studies. , 1994, Epidemiology.

[18]  I. Ackerman,et al.  Variation in age and physical status prior to total knee and hip replacement surgery: a comparison of centers in Australia and Europe. , 2009, Arthritis and rheumatism.

[19]  Kilian Rapp,et al.  Accelerometer-based physical activity in a large observational cohort - study protocol and design of the activity and function of the elderly in Ulm (ActiFE Ulm) study , 2010, BMC geriatrics.

[20]  P. Dieppe,et al.  Help-seeking behaviour among people living with chronic hip or knee pain in the community , 2009, BMC musculoskeletal disorders.

[21]  L. Ferrucci,et al.  The Effect of Cardiovascular and Osteoarticular Diseases on Disability in Older Italian Men and Women: Rationale, Design, and Sample Characteristics of the Progetto Veneto Anziani (PRO.V.A.) Study , 2002, Journal of the American Geriatrics Society.

[22]  Nancy L. Pedersen,et al.  Cross-national determinants of quality of life from six longitudinal studies on aging: The CLESA Project , 2003, Aging clinical and experimental research.

[23]  C. Jinks,et al.  Measuring the population impact of knee pain and disability with the Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) , 2002, Pain.

[24]  J. Lawrence,et al.  Osteo-Arthrosis: Prevalence in the Population and Relationship between Symptoms and X-ray Changes , 1966, Annals of the rheumatic diseases.

[25]  A. Beekman,et al.  COHORT PROFILE Cohort Profile : The Longitudinal Aging Study Amsterdam , 2011 .

[26]  E. Thomas,et al.  Knee pain and osteoarthritis in the general population: what influences patients to consult? , 2007, Family practice.

[27]  H. Brenner,et al.  [Incidence and prevalence of cox- and gonarthrosis in the general population]. , 1997, Zeitschrift fur Orthopadie und ihre Grenzgebiete.

[28]  M. Hochberg,et al.  The experience of pain and emergent osteoarthritis of the knee. , 2001, Osteoarthritis and cartilage.