Comparison of estimation algorithms for individual tree diameter at breast height based on hand-held mobile laser scanning

ABSTRACT Hand-held mobile laser scanning (HMLS) can quickly and effectively obtain tree point cloud data, which has great potential to conduct forest resource survey at the plot or stand scale. To improve the estimation precision of Diameter at Breast Height (DBH) for individual trees based on HMLS data, four algorithms were compared and the ideal conditions (slice thickness, inclination, point cloud integrity) of use for each algorithm were evaluated. First, the original point cloud data were denoised, sliced, layered, and clustered based on the normalized point cloud data. Then, the tree DBH was estimated by the four algorithms under different conditions. Results showed that: (1) The optimal point cloud thickness for estimating tree DBH was 5 cm for the two-dimensional algorithms and 15 cm for the three-dimensional algorithm. (2) The root mean square error (RMSE) varied by approximately 0.5 and 0.18 cm with the change of inclination for two-dimensional algorithms and three-dimensional algorithm, respectively. (3) A reduction in point cloud integrity can affect the accuracy of all four algorithms, while the fast convex hull algorithm was the most impacted. The two-dimensional algorithms were computationally more efficient than the three-dimensional one. However, the former was less robust than the latter.

[1]  Jinzhuo Wu,et al.  Classification of Handheld Laser Scanning Tree Point Cloud Based on Different KNN Algorithms and Random Forest Algorithm , 2021 .

[2]  J. Hyyppä,et al.  Hand-Held Personal Laser Scanning , 2021 .

[3]  Juha Hyyppä,et al.  Comparison of Backpack, Handheld, Under-Canopy UAV, and Above-Canopy UAV Laser Scanning for Field Reference Data Collection in Boreal Forests , 2020, Remote. Sens..

[4]  Martina Slámová,et al.  The Comparison of Stem Curve Accuracy Determined from Point Clouds Acquired by Different Terrestrial Remote Sensing Methods , 2020, Remote. Sens..

[5]  Christoph Gollob,et al.  Forest Inventory with Long Range and High-Speed Personal Laser Scanning (PLS) and Simultaneous Localization and Mapping (SLAM) Technology , 2020, Remote. Sens..

[6]  Norbert Pfeifer,et al.  International benchmarking of terrestrial laser scanning approaches for forest inventories , 2018, ISPRS Journal of Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing.

[7]  Hans-Gerd Maas,et al.  Comparison and Combination of Mobile and Terrestrial Laser Scanning for Natural Forest Inventories , 2018, Forests.

[8]  Julia Armesto,et al.  Automatic dendrometry: Tree detection, tree height and diameter estimation using terrestrial laser scanning , 2018, Int. J. Appl. Earth Obs. Geoinformation.

[9]  Diego González-Aguilera,et al.  Comparing Terrestrial Laser Scanning (TLS) and Wearable Laser Scanning (WLS) for Individual Tree Modeling at Plot Level , 2018, Remote. Sens..

[10]  Xin Tian,et al.  Evaluating Different Methods for Estimating Diameter at Breast Height from Terrestrial Laser Scanning , 2018, Remote. Sens..

[11]  Piermaria Corona,et al.  Integrating terrestrial and airborne laser scanning for the assessment of single-tree attributes in Mediterranean forest stands , 2018 .

[12]  Konstantin Olschofsky,et al.  Operational assessment of aboveground tree volume and biomass by terrestrial laser scanning , 2016, Comput. Electron. Agric..

[13]  Sébastien Bauwens,et al.  Forest Inventory with Terrestrial LiDAR: A Comparison of Static and Hand-Held Mobile Laser Scanning , 2016 .

[14]  M. Vastaranta,et al.  Terrestrial laser scanning in forest inventories , 2016 .

[15]  Ville Kankare,et al.  Diameter distribution estimation with laser scanning based multisource single tree inventory , 2015 .

[16]  Hui Lin,et al.  Retrieval and Accuracy Assessment of Tree and Stand Parameters for Chinese Fir Plantation Using Terrestrial Laser Scanning , 2015, IEEE Geoscience and Remote Sensing Letters.

[17]  Emily Williams,et al.  Assessing Handheld Mobile Laser Scanners for Forest Surveys , 2015, Remote. Sens..

[18]  Johan Holmgren,et al.  Tree Stem and Height Measurements using Terrestrial Laser Scanning and the RANSAC Algorithm , 2014, Remote. Sens..

[19]  Juha Hyyppä,et al.  Possibilities of a Personal Laser Scanning System for Forest Mapping and Ecosystem Services , 2014, Sensors.

[20]  Michael Bosse,et al.  Zebedee: Design of a Spring-Mounted 3-D Range Sensor with Application to Mobile Mapping , 2012, IEEE Transactions on Robotics.

[21]  Yuwei Chen,et al.  Multiplatform Mobile Laser Scanning: Usability and Performance , 2012, Sensors.

[22]  André Iost,et al.  From points to numbers: a database-driven approach to convert terrestrial LiDAR point clouds to tree volumes , 2012, European Journal of Forest Research.

[23]  P. Gong,et al.  Automated methods for measuring DBH and tree heights with a commercial scanning lidar , 2011 .

[24]  Marcin Bator,et al.  Fuzzy Hough Transform-Based Methods for Extraction and Measurements of Single Trees in Large-Volume 3D Terrestrial LIDAR Data , 2010, ICCVG.

[25]  N. J. Tate,et al.  Estimating tree and stand variables in a Corsican Pine woodland from terrestrial laser scanner data , 2009 .

[26]  A. Al-Sharadqah,et al.  Error analysis for circle fitting algorithms , 2009, 0907.0421.

[27]  Hans-Gerd Maas,et al.  Automatic forest inventory parameter determination from terrestrial laser scanner data , 2008 .

[28]  P. Radtke,et al.  Detailed Stem Measurements of Standing Trees from Ground-Based Scanning Lidar , 2006, Forest Science.

[29]  Pete Watt,et al.  Measuring forest structure with terrestrial laser scanning , 2005 .

[30]  C. Hopkinson,et al.  Assessing forest metrics with a ground-based scanning lidar , 2004 .

[31]  R. K. Shyamasundar,et al.  Introduction to algorithms , 1996 .

[32]  W. Gander,et al.  Least-squares fitting of circles and ellipses , 1994 .

[33]  J. Hyyppä,et al.  Hand-Held Personal Laser Scanning – Current Status and Perspectives for Forest Inventory Application , 2020 .

[34]  Li Na,et al.  Segmentation of building facade point clouds using RANSAC , 2011 .

[35]  Piotr Wężyk,et al.  TERRESTRIAL LASER SCANNING VERSUS TRADITIONAL FOREST INVENTORY FIRST RESULTS FROM THE POLISH FORESTS , 2007 .

[36]  H. Spiecker,et al.  DESCRIBING FOREST STANDS USING TERRESTRIAL LASER-SCANNING , 2004 .