Notices of Privacy Practices: A Survey of the Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act of 1996 Documents Presented to Patients at US Hospitals

Background:Federal regulation requires hospitals to present patients with a Notice of Privacy Practices (NPP) that contains all stipulated content items, is readable by patients, and posted on institutional web sites. Objective:The objective of this study was to determine whether the NPP texts contain the required content, if readability is influenced by local literacy rates, and if readability or the presentation of NPP texts in other languages is influenced by local rates of English proficiency. Research Design:The authors conducted a cross-sectional study of the web sites of 115 hospitals selected from the US News and World Report list: Best Hospitals in America. Measures:English NPP texts were evaluated for 18 content items and readability using the Flesch-Kincaid scale, which assigns the minimal grade level required to read a text (range, 0–16). Results:NPP texts were available for all hospitals (115 of 115). A Spanish-language NPP was available for 25% (29 of 115). All content items were evident in 76% (87 of 115) of hospitals’ NPP texts. The average grade-level readability of NPP text was 12.3 (95% confidence interval, 12.0–12.7). Readability was not associated with the rate of local literacy (P = 0.07). Hospitals with a lower local rate of English proficiency had NPP texts that were more difficult to read (P = 0.03) and did not present NPP texts in other languages more frequently (P = 0.15). Conclusions:Although NPP texts typically cover the stipulated content, they are written beyond the reading capacity of the majority of American adults. Explicit federal guidance is needed to help privacy lawyers draft NPP texts that are both comprehensive and comprehensible. The goals of the Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act of 1996 Privacy Rule cannot be met with NPP texts patients cannot decipher.

[1]  T. Habermann,et al.  Randomized, controlled trial of an easy-to-read informed consent statement for clinical trial participation: a study of the Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group. , 2003, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[2]  R. M. Cooper,et al.  Readability of informed consent forms. , 1991, American journal of hospital pharmacy.

[3]  L. G. Doak,et al.  Strategies to improve cancer education materials. , 1996, Oncology nursing forum.

[4]  C. Meade,et al.  Patient literacy and the readability of smoking education literature. , 1989, American journal of public health.

[5]  A Cuschieri,et al.  Factors affecting quality of informed consent. , 1993, BMJ.

[6]  L. G. Doak,et al.  Teaching Patients With Low Literacy Skills , 1985 .

[7]  J. Peter Kincaid,et al.  Ease of Comprehension of Standard and Readable Automobile Insurance Policies as a Function of Reading Abilitya , 1977 .

[8]  Douglas C McCrory,et al.  Empirical Research on Informed Consent , 1999 .

[9]  Michael K Paasche-Orlow,et al.  Readability standards for informed-consent forms as compared with actual readability. , 2003, The New England journal of medicine.

[10]  M. Handelsman,et al.  In search of the abominable consent form: the impact of readability and personalization. , 1998, Journal of clinical psychology.

[11]  J Weston,et al.  Evaluating the benefits of a patient information video during the informed consent process. , 1997, Patient education and counseling.

[12]  D C McCrory,et al.  Empirical research on informed consent. An annotated bibliography. , 1999, The Hastings Center report.

[13]  H. Humphrey,et al.  Standards for privacy of individually identifiable health information. , 2003, Health care law monthly.

[14]  G. Barbour,et al.  Videotape aids informed consent decision. , 1978, JAMA.

[15]  B. Jolly,et al.  Simplification of emergency department discharge instructions improves patient comprehension. , 1995, Annals of emergency medicine.

[16]  Board on Neuroscience and Behavioral Health , 2004 .

[17]  Barry T Peterson,et al.  Improving readability of consent forms: what the computers may not tell you. , 1992, IRB.

[18]  David A. Kindig,et al.  Health literacy : a prescription to end confusion , 2004 .

[19]  J. Wofford,et al.  The multimedia computer for low-literacy patient education: a pilot project of cancer risk perceptions. , 2001, MedGenMed : Medscape general medicine.

[20]  J. Dausset,et al.  Audiovisual documentation of oral consent: a new method of informed consent for illiterate populations , 2002, The Lancet.

[21]  E Bjørn,et al.  Can the written information to research subjects be improved?--an empirical study. , 1999, Journal of medical ethics.

[22]  Improvement,et al.  Adult literacy in America : a first look at the results of the National Adult Literacy Survey , 1993 .

[23]  F. E. Freeberg,et al.  Informed consent documents: increasing comprehension by reducing reading level. , 1990, IRB.

[24]  Michael S Lauer,et al.  Readability of informed-consent forms. , 2003, The New England journal of medicine.

[25]  R. P. Fishburne,et al.  Derivation of New Readability Formulas (Automated Readability Index, Fog Count and Flesch Reading Ease Formula) for Navy Enlisted Personnel , 1975 .