Changes in attention and information-processing speed following severe traumatic brain injury: a meta-analytic review.

Deficits in attention are frequently reported following severe traumatic brain injury (TBI). However, methodological differences make it difficult to reconcile inconsistencies in the research findings in order to undertake an evidence-based assessment of attention. The current study therefore undertook a meta-analytic review of research examining attention following severe TBI. A search of the PsycINFO and PubMed databases spanning the years 1980 to 2005 was undertaken with 24 search terms. Detailed inclusion and exclusion criteria were used to screen all articles, leaving 41 studies that were included in the current meta-analysis. Weighted Cohen's d effect sizes, percentage overlap statistics, and confidence intervals were calculated for the different tests of attention. Fail-safe Ns were additionally calculated to address the bias introduced by the tendency to publish significant results. Large and significant deficits were found in specific measures of information-processing speed, attention span, focused/selective attention, sustained attention, and supervisory attentional control following severe TBI. Finally, age, education, and postinjury interval were not significantly related to these deficits in attention.

[1]  Peter C. Van Wolffelaar,et al.  Divided Attention 5 to 10 Years after Severe Closed Head Injury , 1989, Cortex.

[2]  A. Green,et al.  Effects of diffuse axonal injury on speed of information processing following severe traumatic brain injury. , 2004, Neuropsychology.

[3]  J. K. Harris,et al.  Utility of a demographic equation in detecting impaired NART performance after TBI. , 2001, The British journal of clinical psychology.

[4]  Larry V. Hedges,et al.  Cooper, Harris, and Larry V. Hedges, eds., The Handbook of Research Synthesis. New York: Russell Sage Foundation, 1994. , 1994 .

[5]  M. Humphreys,et al.  Effects of closed-head injury on attentional processes: an information-processing stage analysis. , 1990, Journal of clinical and experimental neuropsychology.

[6]  T. Zahn,et al.  Reaction time indicators of attention deficits in closed head injury. , 1999, Journal of clinical and experimental neuropsychology.

[7]  M. Ríos,et al.  Attentional control and slowness of information processing after severe traumatic brain injury , 2004, Brain injury.

[8]  M. Schmitter-Edgecombe,et al.  Acquisition of skilled visual search performance following severe closed-head injury , 2001, Journal of the International Neuropsychological Society.

[9]  D. Gronwall.  Paced Auditory Serial-Addition Task: A Measure of Recovery from Concussion , 1977, Perceptual and motor skills.

[10]  Jacob Cohen,et al.  A power primer. , 1992, Psychological bulletin.

[11]  R. Hoosain,et al.  Talking While Performing a Task: A Better Attentional Performance in Patients With Closed Head Injury? , 2002, Journal of clinical and experimental neuropsychology.

[12]  M. Schmitter-Edgecombe.  Effects of divided attention on implicit and explicit memory performance following severe closed head injury. , 1996 .

[13]  M. Timmerman,et al.  Slow information processing after very severe closed head injury: impaired access to declarative knowledge and intact application and acquisition of procedural knowledge , 1999, Neuropsychologia.

[14]  B. Breitmeyer,et al.  Visual information processing after severe closed head injury: effects of forward and backward masking. , 1994, Journal of neurology, neurosurgery, and psychiatry.

[15]  M. Lezak.  Neuropsychological assessment, 3rd ed. , 1995 .

[16]  Measuring recovery from post traumatic amnesia. , 1999, Brain injury.

[17]  L. Erasmus,et al.  Multisensory integration after traumatic brain injury: a reaction time study between pairings of vision, touch and audition , 2003, Brain injury.

[18]  E. Vakil,et al.  Automatic temporal order judgment: the effect of intentionality of retrieval on closed-head-injured patients. , 1991, Journal of clinical and experimental neuropsychology.

[19]  M. Schmitter-Edgecombe,et al.  Effects of severe closed-head injury on three stages of information processing. , 1992, Journal of clinical and experimental neuropsychology.

[20]  C. Umilta,et al.  Attention and Control Deficits Following Closed Head Injury , 1994, Cortex.

[21]  G. Geffen,et al.  Covert orientation of visual attention after closed head injury , 1992, Neuropsychologia.

[22]  J. Bain,et al.  Effects of closed-head injury on attentional processes: generality of Sternberg's additive factor method. , 1994, Journal of clinical and experimental neuropsychology.

[23]  P. Azouvi,et al.  Divided attention and mental effort after severe traumatic brain injury , 2004, Neuropsychologia.

[24]  M. Schmitter-Edgecombe,et al.  Visual selective attention after severe closed head injury , 1998, Journal of the International Neuropsychological Society.

[25]  Viviane Pouthas,et al.  Relationships between time estimation, memory, attention, and processing speed in patients with severe traumatic brain injury , 2003, Neuropsychologia.

[26]  D. Geldmacher,et al.  The effect of character and array type on visual spatial search quality following traumatic brain injury. , 1998, Brain injury.

[27]  J. Crawford,et al.  Performance on the Test of Everyday Attention and Standard Tests of Attention following Severe Traumatic Brain Injury , 2001, The Clinical neuropsychologist.

[28]  T. Coughlan,et al.  Social adjustment after closed head injury: a further follow-up seven years after injury. , 1985, Journal of neurology, neurosurgery, and psychiatry.

[29]  L. Hedges,et al.  The Handbook of Research Synthesis , 1995 .

[30]  W. Brouwer,et al.  Clinical Neuropsychology of Attention , 1994 .

[31]  W. Brouwer,et al.  Attention and Driving in Traumatic Brain Injury: A Question of Coping with Time‐Pressure , 2002, The Journal of head trauma rehabilitation.

[32]  H. Heinze,et al.  Parallel and serial visual search after closed head injury: Electrophysiological evidence for perceptual dysfunctions , 1992, Neuropsychologia.

[33]  Talal Al-Shihabi,et al.  Divided Attention and Driving: A Pilot Study Using Virtual Reality Technology , 2002, The Journal of head trauma rehabilitation.

[34]  W. Rogers,et al.  Automatic process development following severe closed head injury. , 1997, Neuropsychology.

[35]  W. Marks,et al.  Selective attention deficits following severe closed head injury: the role of inhibitory processes. , 2005, Neuropsychology.

[36]  L. Leach,et al.  Neuropsychological Differential Diagnosis , 1999 .

[37]  G. A. Riley,et al.  How robust is performance on the National Adult Reading Test following traumatic brain injury? , 2003, The British journal of clinical psychology.

[38]  D. Sharpe,et al.  Of apples and oranges, file drawers and garbage: why validity issues in meta-analysis will not go away. , 1997, Clinical psychology review.

[39]  E C Hills,et al.  Effect of stimulus number, target-to-distractor ratio, and motor speed on visual spatial search quality following traumatic brain injury. , 1997, Brain injury.

[40]  E. Bigler,et al.  Is performance on the Wechsler test of adult reading affected by traumatic brain injury? , 2007, The British journal of clinical psychology.

[41]  M. Schmitter-Edgecombe,et al.  Intactness of inhibitory attentional mechanisms following severe closed-head injury. , 2000, Neuropsychology.

[42]  D. M. Parker,et al.  A Handbook of Neuropsychological Assessment , 1992 .

[43]  M. Schmitter-Edgecombe,et al.  Effects of divided attention on automatic and controlled components of memory after severe closed-head injury. , 2000, Neuropsychology.

[44]  Emmanuel Strypstein,et al.  Dual Task Performance after Severe Diffuse Traumatic Brain Injury or Vascular Prefrontal Damage , 2000, Journal of clinical and experimental neuropsychology.

[45]  R. Chan,et al.  Attentional deficits in patients with closed head injury: a further study to the discriminative validity of the test of everyday attention , 2000 .

[46]  K. Zakzanis,et al.  Statistics to tell the truth, the whole truth, and nothing but the truth: formulae, illustrative numerical examples, and heuristic interpretation of effect size analyses for neuropsychological researchers. , 2001, Archives of clinical neuropsychology : the official journal of the National Academy of Neuropsychologists.

[47]  W. Brouwer,et al.  Divided Attention After Closed Head Injury , 2003 .

[48]  B. Bussel,et al.  Working memory and supervisory control after severe closed-head injury. A study of dual task performance and random generation. , 1996, Journal of clinical and experimental neuropsychology.

[49]  B. Deelman,et al.  Executive Functioning, Attention and Frontal Lesions in Patients with Chronic CHI , 2000, Journal of clinical and experimental neuropsychology.

[50]  W. Brouwer,et al.  Divided attention years after severe closed head injury: The effect of dependencies between the subtasks , 2001, Brain and Cognition.

[51]  R. Adams.  Neuropsychology for Clinical Practice : Etiology, Assessment, and Treatment of Common Neurological Disorders , 1996 .

[52]  Gregg B. Jackson,et al.  Meta-Analysis: Cumulating Research Findings Across Studies , 1982 .

[53]  T. Shallice.  From Neuropsychology to Mental Structure: Converging Operations: Specific Syndromes and Evidence from Normal Subjects , 1988 .

[54]  Piers Steel,et al.  Comparing meta-analytic moderator estimation techniques under realistic conditions. , 2002, The Journal of applied psychology.

[55]  L. Hedges,et al.  Statistical Methods for Meta-Analysis , 1987 .

[56]  Jacob Cohen.  Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences , 1969, The SAGE Encyclopedia of Research Design.

[57]  O. Spreen,et al.  A Compendium of Neuropsychological Tests: Administration, Norms, and Commentary , 1991 .

[58]  R. Chan.  Attention Deficits in Patients with Persisting Postconcussive Complaints: A General Deficit or Specific Component Deficit? , 2002, Journal of clinical and experimental neuropsychology.

[59]  G. Goldenberg,et al.  Cerebral correlates of disturbed executive function and memory in survivors of severe closed head injury: a SPECT study. , 1992, Journal of neurology, neurosurgery, and psychiatry.

[60]  Jennifer A. Mangels,et al.  Effects of divided attention on episodic memory in chronic traumatic brain injury: a function of severity and strategy , 2002, Neuropsychologia.

[61]  J. Ghajar.  Traumatic brain injury , 2000, The Lancet.

[62]  Robert Rosenthal.  WRITING META-ANALYTIC REVIEWS , 1995 .

[63]  J. Crawford,et al.  The Covert Orienting of Visual Attention Following Severe Traumatic Brain Injury , 2001, Journal of clinical and experimental neuropsychology.

[64]  J. Ponsford,et al.  Attentional deficits following closed-head injury. , 1992, Journal of clinical and experimental neuropsychology.

[65]  N. Marsh,et al.  Relationship between cognitive deficits and social skill after head injury. , 1991 .

[66]  Mark W. Lipsey,et al.  Practical Meta-Analysis , 2000 .

[67]  I. Keller,et al.  Selective impairment of auditory attention following closed head injuries or right cerebrovascular accidents. , 1995, Brain research. Cognitive brain research.

[68]  Norman W. Park,et al.  Divided attention impairments after traumatic brain injury , 1999, Neuropsychologia.

[69]  G. Teasdale,et al.  Premorbid intelligence and brain injury. , 2005, The British journal of clinical psychology.

[70]  B. Deelman,et al.  Deficits of attention after closed-head injury: slowness only? , 1996, Journal of clinical and experimental neuropsychology.

[71]  T. Tombaugh,et al.  Detecting simulation of attention deficits using reaction time tests. , 2006, Archives of clinical neuropsychology : the official journal of the National Academy of Neuropsychologists.