Online Parallel Accumulation–Serial Fragmentation (PASEF) with a Novel Trapped Ion Mobility Mass Spectrometer

In bottom-up proteomics, peptides are separated by liquid chromatography with elution peak widths in the range of seconds, while mass spectra are acquired in about 100 microseconds with time-of-fight (TOF) instruments. This allows adding ion mobility as a third dimension of separation. Among several formats, trapped ion mobility spectrometry (TIMS) is attractive due to its small size, low voltage requirements and high efficiency of ion utilization. We have recently demonstrated a scan mode termed parallel accumulation – serial fragmentation (PASEF), which multiplies the sequencing speed without any loss in sensitivity (Meier et al., PMID: 26538118). Here we introduce the timsTOF Pro instrument, which optimally implements online PASEF. It features an orthogonal ion path into the ion mobility device, limiting the amount of debris entering the instrument and making it very robust in daily operation. We investigate different precursor selection schemes for shotgun proteomics to optimally allocate in excess of 100 fragmentation events per second. More than 800,000 fragmentation spectra in standard 120 min LC runs are easily achievable, which can be used for near exhaustive precursor selection in complex mixtures or re-sequencing weak precursors. MaxQuant identified more than 6,400 proteins in single run HeLa analyses without matching to a library, and with high quantitative reproducibility (R > 0.97). Online PASEF achieves a remarkable sensitivity with more than 2,900 proteins identified in 30 min runs of only 10 ng HeLa digest. We also show that highly reproducible collisional cross sections can be acquired on a large scale (R > 0.99). PASEF on the timsTOF Pro is a valuable addition to the technological toolbox in proteomics, with a number of unique operating modes that are only beginning to be explored.

[1]  A novel LC system embeds analytes in pre-formed gradients for rapid, ultra-robust proteomics , 2018 .

[2]  Melvin A. Park,et al.  Trapped ion mobility spectrometry: A short review , 2018 .

[3]  Matthias Mann,et al.  EASI-tag enables accurate multiplexed and interference-free MS2-based proteome quantification , 2017, bioRxiv.

[4]  Stephan Hann,et al.  An Interlaboratory Evaluation of Drift Tube Ion Mobility-Mass Spectrometry Collision Cross Section Measurements. , 2017, Analytical chemistry.

[5]  Karina D. Sørensen,et al.  An Optimized Shotgun Strategy for the Rapid Generation of Comprehensive Human Proteomes , 2017, Cell systems.

[6]  Matthias Mann,et al.  Parallel accumulation for 100% duty cycle trapped ion mobility-mass spectrometry , 2017 .

[7]  Matthias Mann,et al.  Loss-less Nano-fractionator for High Sensitivity, High Coverage Proteomics * , 2017, Molecular & Cellular Proteomics.

[8]  Jody C. May,et al.  Ion Mobility Collision Cross Section Compendium. , 2017, Analytical chemistry.

[9]  Z. Karpas,et al.  Ion Mobility Spectrometry, Third Edition , 2016 .

[10]  Ruedi Aebersold,et al.  Mass-spectrometric exploration of proteome structure and function , 2016, Nature.

[11]  Marco Y. Hein,et al.  The Perseus computational platform for comprehensive analysis of (prote)omics data , 2016, Nature Methods.

[12]  Michael A. Ewing,et al.  Hybrid ion mobility and mass spectrometry as a separation tool. , 2016, Journal of chromatography. A.

[13]  Melvin A. Park,et al.  Fundamentals of Trapped Ion Mobility Spectrometry Part II: Fluid Dynamics , 2016, Journal of The American Society for Mass Spectrometry.

[14]  Matthias Mann,et al.  Parallel Accumulation-Serial Fragmentation (PASEF): Multiplying Sequencing Speed and Sensitivity by Synchronized Scans in a Trapped Ion Mobility Device. , 2015, Journal of proteome research.

[15]  Melvin A. Park,et al.  Microheterogeneity within conformational states of ubiquitin revealed by high resolution trapped ion mobility spectrometry. , 2015, The Analyst.

[16]  A. Makarov,et al.  Evolution of Orbitrap Mass Spectrometry Instrumentation. , 2015, Annual review of analytical chemistry.

[17]  M. Mann,et al.  The Impact II, a Very High-Resolution Quadrupole Time-of-Flight Instrument (QTOF) for Deep Shotgun Proteomics* , 2015, Molecular & Cellular Proteomics.

[18]  A. Lamond,et al.  Multidimensional proteomics for cell biology , 2015, Nature Reviews Molecular Cell Biology.

[19]  I. Gràcia,et al.  Review on ion mobility spectrometry. Part 1: current instrumentation. , 2015, The Analyst.

[20]  J I Baumbach,et al.  Review on ion mobility spectrometry. Part 2: hyphenated methods and effects of experimental parameters. , 2015, The Analyst.

[21]  John A. McLean,et al.  Ion Mobility-Mass Spectrometry: Time-Dispersive Instrumentation , 2014, Analytical chemistry.

[22]  Mathias Wilhelm,et al.  Ion Mobility Tandem Mass Spectrometry Enhances Performance of Bottom-up Proteomics , 2014, Molecular & Cellular Proteomics.

[23]  Marco Y. Hein,et al.  Accurate Proteome-wide Label-free Quantification by Delayed Normalization and Maximal Peptide Ratio Extraction, Termed MaxLFQ * , 2014, Molecular & Cellular Proteomics.

[24]  Melvin A. Park,et al.  High resolution trapped ion mobility spectrometery of peptides. , 2014, Analytical chemistry.

[25]  Lingjun Li,et al.  Large-Scale Collision Cross-Section Profiling on a Traveling Wave Ion Mobility Mass Spectrometer , 2014, Journal of The American Society for Mass Spectrometry.

[26]  C. Eyers,et al.  The power of ion mobility-mass spectrometry for structural characterization and the study of conformational dynamics. , 2014, Nature chemistry.

[27]  Melvin A. Park,et al.  Ion dynamics in a trapped ion mobility spectrometer. , 2014, The Analyst.

[28]  M. Mann,et al.  Minimal, encapsulated proteomic-sample processing applied to copy-number estimation in eukaryotic cells , 2014, Nature Methods.

[29]  Stefan Tenzer,et al.  Drift time-specific collision energies enable deep-coverage data-independent acquisition proteomics , 2013, Nature Methods.

[30]  Melvin A. Park,et al.  Fundamentals of Trapped Ion Mobility Spectrometry , 2014, Journal of The American Society for Mass Spectrometry.

[31]  A. Heck,et al.  Next-generation proteomics: towards an integrative view of proteome dynamics , 2012, Nature Reviews Genetics.

[32]  Johannes P C Vissers,et al.  Using ion purity scores for enhancing quantitative accuracy and precision in complex proteomics samples , 2012, Analytical and Bioanalytical Chemistry.

[33]  F. Fernandez-Lima,et al.  Note: Integration of trapped ion mobility spectrometry with mass spectrometry. , 2011, The Review of scientific instruments.

[34]  Melvin A. Park,et al.  Gas-phase separation using a trapped ion mobility spectrometer , 2011, International journal for ion mobility spectrometry : official publication of the International Society for Ion Mobility Spectrometry.

[35]  M. Mann,et al.  More than 100,000 detectable peptide species elute in single shotgun proteomics runs but the majority is inaccessible to data-dependent LC-MS/MS. , 2011, Journal of proteome research.

[36]  M. Mann,et al.  Andromeda: a peptide search engine integrated into the MaxQuant environment. , 2011, Journal of proteome research.

[37]  Ronald J Moore,et al.  An LC-IMS-MS platform providing increased dynamic range for high-throughput proteomic studies. , 2010, Journal of proteome research.

[38]  Richard D. Smith,et al.  Fundamentals of traveling wave ion mobility spectrometry. , 2008, Analytical chemistry.

[39]  M. Mann,et al.  MaxQuant enables high peptide identification rates, individualized p.p.b.-range mass accuracies and proteome-wide protein quantification , 2008, Nature Biotechnology.

[40]  J. Yates,et al.  Mass spectrometry for proteomics. , 2008, Current opinion in chemical biology.

[41]  Prabha Dwivedi,et al.  Ion mobility-mass spectrometry. , 2008, Journal of mass spectrometry : JMS.

[42]  Richard D. Smith,et al.  Toward plasma proteome profiling with ion mobility-mass spectrometry. , 2006, Journal of proteome research.

[43]  R. Aebersold,et al.  Mass Spectrometry and Protein Analysis , 2006, Science.

[44]  Edward A. Mason,et al.  Transport Properties of Ions in Gases: MASON:TRANSPORT PROPERTIES O-BK , 2005 .

[45]  K. Parker,et al.  Multiplexed Protein Quantitation in Saccharomyces cerevisiae Using Amine-reactive Isobaric Tagging Reagents*S , 2004, Molecular & Cellular Proteomics.

[46]  R. Aebersold,et al.  Mass spectrometry-based proteomics , 2003, Nature.

[47]  Andrew H. Thompson,et al.  Tandem mass tags: a novel quantification strategy for comparative analysis of complex protein mixtures by MS/MS. , 2003, Analytical chemistry.

[48]  A. E. Counterman,et al.  Cis-trans signatures of proline-containing tryptic peptides in the gas phase. , 2002, Analytical chemistry.

[49]  S. Valentine,et al.  Resolving isomeric peptide mixtures: a combined HPLC/ion mobility-TOFMS analysis of a 4000-component combinatorial library. , 2002, Analytical chemistry.

[50]  S. Valentine,et al.  A database of 660 peptide ion cross sections: Use of intrinsic size parameters for bona fide predictions of cross sections , 1999, Journal of the American Society for Mass Spectrometry.

[51]  J P Reilly,et al.  Gas-phase separations of protease digests , 1998, Journal of the American Society for Mass Spectrometry.

[52]  E. G. Nazarov,et al.  A new method of separation of multi-atomic ions by mobility at atmospheric pressure using a high-frequency amplitude-asymmetric strong electric field , 1993 .

[53]  P. Volpe,et al.  Quantitative studies on cell proteins in suspension cultures. , 1970, European journal of biochemistry.