A Parametric Level Set-Based Approach to Difference Imaging in Electrical Impedance Tomography

This paper presents a novel difference imaging approach based on the recently developed parametric level set (PLS) method for estimating the change in a target conductivity from electrical impedance tomography measurements. As in conventional difference imaging, the reconstruction of conductivity change is based on data sets measured from the surface of a body before and after the change. The key feature of the proposed approach is that the conductivity change to be reconstructed is assumed to be piecewise constant, while the geometry of the anomaly is represented by a shape-based PLS function employing Gaussian radial basis functions (GRBFs). The representation of the PLS function by using GRBF provides flexibility in describing a large class of shapes with fewer unknowns. This feature is advantageous, as it may significantly reduce the overall number of unknowns, improve the condition number of the inverse problem, and enhance the computational efficiency of the technique. To evaluate the proposed PLS-based difference imaging approach, results obtained via simulation, phantom study, and in vivo pig data are studied. We find that the proposed approach tolerates more modeling errors and leads to a significant improvement in image quality compared with the conventional linear approach.

[1]  Martin Hanke,et al.  Recent progress in electrical impedance tomography , 2003 .

[2]  J. Kaipio,et al.  Compensation of errors due to discretization, domain truncation and unknown contact impedances in electrical impedance tomography , 2009 .

[3]  M. Soleimani,et al.  Level set reconstruction of conductivity and permittivity from boundary electrical measurements using experimental data , 2006 .

[4]  Andreas Hauptmann,et al.  A Direct D-Bar Method for Partial Boundary Data Electrical Impedance Tomography With a Priori Information , 2017 .

[5]  Jennifer L. Mueller,et al.  Incorporating a Spatial Prior into Nonlinear D-Bar EIT Imaging for Complex Admittivities , 2016, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[6]  D S Holder,et al.  Use of polyacrylamide gels in a saline-filled tank to determine the linearity of the Sheffield Mark 1 electrical impedance tomography (EIT) system in measuring impedance disturbances. , 1994, Physiological measurement.

[7]  G Hahn,et al.  Imaging pathologic pulmonary air and fluid accumulation by functional and absolute EIT , 2006, Physiological measurement.

[8]  Andreas Kirsch,et al.  Characterization of the shape of a scattering obstacle using the spectral data of the far field operator , 1998 .

[9]  E. Miller,et al.  Parametric level set reconstruction methods for hyperspectral diffuse optical tomography , 2012, Biomedical optics express.

[10]  Ryan J. Halter,et al.  Absolute Reconstructions Using Rotational Electrical Impedance Tomography for Breast Cancer Imaging , 2017, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[11]  Samuli Siltanen,et al.  Linear and Nonlinear Inverse Problems with Practical Applications , 2012, Computational science and engineering.

[12]  Jennifer L. Mueller,et al.  Effect of Domain Shape Modeling and Measurement Errors on the 2-D D-Bar Method for EIT , 2009, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[13]  D. Isaacson,et al.  An implementation of the reconstruction algorithm of A Nachman for the 2D inverse conductivity problem , 2000 .

[14]  Ataollah Abbasi,et al.  A non-iterative linear inverse solution for the block approach in EIT , 2010, J. Comput. Sci..

[15]  A. Adler,et al.  Impedance imaging of lung ventilation: do we need to account for chest expansion? , 1996, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[16]  Melody Dodd,et al.  A Real-time D-bar Algorithm for 2-D Electrical Impedance Tomography Data. , 2014, Inverse problems and imaging.

[17]  Bastian von Harrach,et al.  Recent Progress on the Factorization Method for Electrical Impedance Tomography , 2013, Comput. Math. Methods Medicine.

[18]  Eric L. Miller,et al.  Parametric Level Set Methods for Inverse Problems , 2010, SIAM J. Imaging Sci..

[19]  S. Siltanen,et al.  Direct inversion from partial-boundary data in electrical impedance tomography , 2016, 1605.01309.

[20]  Dong Liu,et al.  Multi-phase flow monitoring with electrical impedance tomography using level set based method , 2015 .

[21]  J C Newell,et al.  Imaging cardiac activity by the D-bar method for electrical impedance tomography , 2006, Physiological measurement.

[22]  Ronald Fedkiw,et al.  A review of level-set methods and some recent applications , 2018, J. Comput. Phys..

[23]  William R B Lionheart,et al.  GREIT: a unified approach to 2D linear EIT reconstruction of lung images , 2009, Physiological measurement.

[24]  Matti Lassas,et al.  REGULARIZED D-BAR METHOD FOR THE INVERSE CONDUCTIVITY PROBLEM , 2009 .

[25]  David Isaacson,et al.  A direct reconstruction algorithm for electrical impedance tomography , 2002, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[26]  Andy Adler,et al.  Uniform background assumption produces misleading lung EIT images , 2013, Physiological measurement.

[27]  David Isaacson,et al.  NOSER: An algorithm for solving the inverse conductivity problem , 1990, Int. J. Imaging Syst. Technol..

[28]  Steffen Leonhardt,et al.  Chest electrical impedance tomography examination, data analysis, terminology, clinical use and recommendations: consensus statement of the TRanslational EIT developmeNt stuDy group , 2016, Thorax.

[29]  S. Hamilton EIT Imaging of admittivities with a D-bar method and spatial prior: experimental results for absolute and difference imaging , 2017, Physiological measurement.

[30]  Eric T. Chung,et al.  Electrical impedance tomography using level set representation and total variational regularization , 2005 .

[31]  K. Maute,et al.  A parametric level-set approach for topology optimization of flow domains , 2010 .

[32]  Dong Liu,et al.  Nonlinear Difference Imaging Approach to Three-Dimensional Electrical Impedance Tomography in the Presence of Geometric Modeling Errors , 2016, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[33]  Andy Adler,et al.  Shape Deformation in Two-Dimensional Electrical Impedance Tomography , 2012, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[34]  Dong Liu,et al.  A nonlinear approach to difference imaging in EIT; assessment of the robustness in the presence of modelling errors , 2015 .

[35]  C. Gabriel,et al.  Electrical conductivity of tissue at frequencies below 1 MHz , 2009, Physics in medicine and biology.

[36]  Nuutti Hyvönen,et al.  Factorization method and irregular inclusions in electrical impedance tomography , 2007 .

[37]  Manuchehr Soleimani,et al.  A Narrow-Band Level Set Method Applied to EIT in Brain for Cryosurgery Monitoring , 2006, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[38]  J.P. Kaipio,et al.  Three-dimensional electrical impedance tomography based on the complete electrode model , 1999, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[39]  Marko Vauhkonen,et al.  Suitability of a PXI platform for an electrical impedance tomography system , 2008 .

[40]  R H Bayford,et al.  Using the GRID to improve the computation speed of electrical impedance tomography (EIT) reconstruction algorithms. , 2005, Physiological measurement.

[41]  David S. Holder,et al.  Imaging fast electrical activity in the brain with electrical impedance tomography , 2016, NeuroImage.

[42]  E Kaniusas,et al.  Detection of thoracic vascular structures by electrical impedance tomography: a systematic assessment of prominence peak analysis of impedance changes , 2018, Physiological measurement.

[43]  Eero P. Simoncelli,et al.  Image quality assessment: from error visibility to structural similarity , 2004, IEEE Transactions on Image Processing.

[44]  E. Somersalo,et al.  Existence and uniqueness for electrode models for electric current computed tomography , 1992 .

[45]  Dong Liu,et al.  A Parametric Level Set Method for Electrical Impedance Tomography , 2018, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[46]  Jennifer L. Mueller,et al.  Direct 2-D Reconstructions of Conductivity and Permittivity From EIT Data on a Human Chest , 2015, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[47]  B H Brown,et al.  The Sheffield data collection system. , 1987, Clinical physics and physiological measurement : an official journal of the Hospital Physicists' Association, Deutsche Gesellschaft fur Medizinische Physik and the European Federation of Organisations for Medical Physics.

[48]  Jin Keun Seo,et al.  Monotonicity-based electrical impedance tomography for lung imaging , 2017, 1702.02563.

[49]  Jari P. Kaipio,et al.  Compensation of Modelling Errors Due to Unknown Domain Boundary in Electrical Impedance Tomography , 2011, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[50]  Dong Liu,et al.  Estimation of conductivity changes in a region of interest with electrical impedance tomography , 2014, 1403.6587.