Qualitative Case Study Methodology: Study Design and Implementation for Novice Researchers

Qualitative case study methodology provides tools for researchers to study complex phenomena within their contexts. When the approach is applied correctly, it becomes a valuable method for health science research to develop theory, evaluate programs, and develop interventions. The purpose of this paper is to guide the novice researcher in identifying the key elements for designing and implementing qualitative case study research projects. An overview of the types of case study designs is provided along with general recommendations for writing the research questions, developing propositions, determining the “case” under study, binding the case and a discussion of data sources and triangulation. To facilitate application of these principles, clear examples of research questions, study propositions and the different types of case study designs

[1]  John W. Creswell,et al.  Research Design: Qualitative, Quantitative, and Mixed Methods Approaches , 2010 .

[2]  Kim Usher,et al.  STAMP: components of observable behaviour that indicate potential for patient violence in emergency departments. , 2007, Journal of advanced nursing.

[3]  Bob Algozzine,et al.  Doing Case Study Research: A Practical Guide for Beginning Researchers. Third Edition. , 2006 .

[4]  Mark Wickham,et al.  Reflecting on the strategic use of CAQDAS to manage and report on the qualitative research process , 2005 .

[5]  L. Giddings.  Research Design: Qualitative, Quantitative, and Mixed Methods Approaches, 2d ed , 2005 .

[6]  Mike Nolan,et al.  ‘We do things together’ , 2005 .

[7]  G. Guyatt,et al.  Evidence-Based Nursing: A Guide to Clinical Practice , 2004 .

[8]  John W. Scheib.  Role Stress in the Professional Life of the School Music Teacher: A Collective Case Study , 2003 .

[9]  Pamela Baxter,et al.  The development of nurse decision making: A case study of a four year baccalaureate in nursing programme , 2003 .

[10]  Debbie Tolson,et al.  Coping with menstruation: understanding the needs of women with Parkinson's disease. , 2002, Journal of advanced nursing.

[11]  Glenn Regehr,et al.  Reconstructive Breast Surgery: Referring Physician Knowledge and Learning Needs , 2002, Plastic and reconstructive surgery.

[12]  Luiz Antonio Joia,et al.  Analysing a Web-based e-commerce learning community: a case study in Brazil , 2002, Internet Res..

[13]  Yi-Ching Hsieh,et al.  Factors that influence surgical choices in women with breast carcinoma , 2002, Cancer.

[14]  J. Bottorff,et al.  An Observational Study of the Development of a Nurse-Patient Relationship , 2001 .

[15]  A. Polednak,et al.  Geographic Variation in Postmastectomy Breast Reconstruction Rates , 2000, Plastic and reconstructive surgery.

[16]  C Scanlon,et al.  A Professional Code of Ethics Provides Guidance for Genetic Nursing Practice , 2000, Nursing ethics.

[17]  R. Barbour,et al.  The role of qualitative research in broadening the 'evidence base' for clinical practice. , 2000, Journal of evaluation in clinical practice.

[18]  S. Ziebland,et al.  Analysing qualitative data , 2000, BMJ : British Medical Journal.

[19]  R Campbell,et al.  Innovative Community Services for Rape Victims: An Application of Multiple Case Study Methodology , 1998, American journal of community psychology.

[20]  L. Reaby,et al.  Reasons Why Women Who Have Mastectomy Decide to Have or Not to Have Breast Reconstruction , 1998, Plastic and reconstructive surgery.

[21]  Anne M Wallace,et al.  Pain after breast surgery: a survey of 282 women , 1996, PAIN®.

[22]  M. Sandelowski.  Rigor or rigor mortis: the problem of rigor in qualitative research revisited. , 1993, ANS. Advances in nursing science.

[23]  C Forchuk,et al.  How to critique qualitative research articles. , 1993, The Canadian journal of nursing research = Revue canadienne de recherche en sciences infirmieres.

[24]  Patti Lather,et al.  Critical frames in educational research: Feminist and post‐structural perspectives , 1992 .

[25]  M. Patton,et al.  Qualitative evaluation and research methods , 1992 .

[26]  Nigel Fielding,et al.  Using Computers in Qualitative Research , 1991 .

[27]  L. Krefting.  Rigor in qualitative research: the assessment of trustworthiness. , 1991, The American journal of occupational therapy : official publication of the American Occupational Therapy Association.

[28]  M. Silverstein,et al.  Reasons why mastectomy patients do not have breast reconstruction. , 1990, Plastic and reconstructive surgery.

[29]  Janice M. Morse,et al.  Qualitative Nursing Research: A Contemporary Dialogue , 1990 .

[30]  M. Sandelowski,et al.  The problem of rigor in qualitative research , 1986, ANS. Advances in nursing science.

[31]  R. Yin.  Case Study Research: Design and Methods , 1984 .

[32]  E. Guba.  Criteria for assessing the trustworthiness of naturalistic inquiries , 1981 .

[33]  Margaret Volante.  Qualitative research. , 2008, Nurse researcher.

[34]  M. Morrow,et al.  Factors influencing the use of breast reconstruction postmastectomy: a National Cancer Database study. , 2001, Journal of the American College of Surgeons.

[35]  J. Bottorff,et al.  An observational study of the development of a nurse-patient relationship. , 2001, Clinical nursing research.

[36]  C. Pope,et al.  Qualitative research in health care. Assessing quality in qualitative research. , 2000, BMJ.

[37]  R. Stake.  The art of case study research , 1995 .

[38]  Lyn Richards,et al.  From filing cabinet to computer , 1994 .

[39]  K. Knafl,et al.  Triangulation in Qualitative Research: Issues of Conceptual Clarity and Purpose , 1991 .

[40]  M. Patton.  Qualitative evaluation and research methods, 2nd ed. , 1990 .