Assessing Dimensionality of the Ideal Point Item Response Theory Model Using Posterior Predictive Model Checking
暂无分享,去创建一个
Seang-Hwane Joo | Jung Yeon Park | Philseok Lee | Stephen Stark | Jung Yeon Park | S. Stark | Seang-Hwane Joo | Philseok Lee | Stephen E. Stark
[1] Wendy M. Yen,et al. Effects of Local Item Dependence on the Fit and Equating Performance of the Three-Parameter Logistic Model , 1984 .
[2] Robert E. Ployhart,et al. Determinants, Detection and Amelioration of Adverse Impact in Personnel Selection Procedures: Issues, Evidence and Lessons Learned , 2001 .
[3] F. Drasgow,et al. Fitting measurement models to vocational interest data: are dominance models ideal? , 2009, The Journal of applied psychology.
[4] Erin L. O'Brien,et al. Do Applicants and Incumbents Respond to Personality Items Similarly? A Comparison of Dominance and Ideal Point Response Models , 2011 .
[5] Richard J. Patz,et al. A Straightforward Approach to Markov Chain Monte Carlo Methods for Item Response Models , 1999 .
[6] Roy Levy,et al. Posterior Predictive Model Checking for Conjunctive Multidimensionality in Item Response Theory , 2011 .
[7] Rose A. Mueller-Hanson,et al. Faking and selection: considering the use of personality from select-in and select-out perspectives. , 2003, The Journal of applied psychology.
[8] William Stout,et al. Conditional covariance structure of generalized compensatory multidimensional items , 1999 .
[9] Nathan R. Kuncel,et al. Toward a New Method of Detecting Deliberately Faked Personality Tests: The Use of Idiosyncratic Item Responses , 2007 .
[10] D. Andrich,et al. The structural relationship between attitude and behavior statements from the unfolding perspective. , 1998 .
[11] J. J. Donovan,et al. The Impact of Applicant Faking on Selection Measures, Hiring Decisions, and Employee Performance , 2014 .
[12] J. McGrane. The Bipolarity of Attitudes: Unfolding the Implications of Ambivalence , 2019, Applied psychological measurement.
[13] Robert E. Ployhart,et al. THE DIVERSITY–VALIDITY DILEMMA: STRATEGIES FOR REDUCING RACIOETHNIC AND SEX SUBGROUP DIFFERENCES AND ADVERSE IMPACT IN SELECTION , 2008 .
[14] Nathan T. Carter,et al. The Influence of Dimensionality on Parameter Estimation Accuracy in the Generalized Graded Unfolding Model , 2011 .
[15] L. Tay,et al. A Within-Person Examination of the Ideal-Point Response Process , 2018, Psychological assessment.
[16] Jinfu Zhang,et al. An Item-Level Analysis for Detecting Faking on Personality Tests: Appropriateness of Ideal Point Item Response Theory Models , 2020, Frontiers in Psychology.
[17] F. Drasgow,et al. Theoretical, Statistical, and Substantive Issues in the Assessment of Construct Dimensionality , 2012 .
[18] Nathan T. Carter,et al. An ideal point account of the JDI Work satisfaction scale , 2010 .
[19] F. Drasgow,et al. Adjusting the Adjusted χ2/df Ratio Statistic for Dichotomous Item Response Theory Analyses , 2012 .
[20] Paul E. Spector,et al. When Two Factors Don’t Reflect Two Constructs: How Item Characteristics Can Produce Artifactual Factors , 1997 .
[21] T. Judge,et al. Relationship of personality to performance motivation: a meta-analytic review. , 2002, The Journal of applied psychology.
[22] Henk A. L. Kiers,et al. Why Factor Analysis Often is the Incorrect Model for Analyzing Bipolar Concepts, and What Model to Use Instead , 1994 .
[23] Fritz Drasgow,et al. Fitting Polytomous Item Response Theory Models to Multiple-Choice Tests , 1995 .
[24] J. S. Roberts,et al. Marginal Maximum A Posteriori Item Parameter Estimation for the Generalized Graded Unfolding Model , 2011 .
[25] Seang-Hwane Joo,et al. GGUM-RANK Statement and Person Parameter Estimation With Multidimensional Forced Choice Triplets , 2019, Applied psychological measurement.
[26] Hal S. Stern,et al. Posterior Predictive Assessment of Item Response Theory Models , 2006 .
[27] G. Makransky,et al. Psychometric Properties of the Parent and Teacher ADHD Rating Scale (ADHD-RS) , 2014, Assessment.
[28] William Stout,et al. A New Item Response Theory Modeling Approach with Applications to Unidimensionality Assessment and Ability Estimation , 1990 .
[29] Jason L. Huang,et al. Personality and adaptive performance at work: a meta-analytic investigation. , 2014, The Journal of applied psychology.
[30] M. Zickar,et al. Review of Item Response Theory Practices in Organizational Research , 2017 .
[31] J. S. Roberts,et al. GGUM2004: A Windows-Based Program to Estimate Parameters in the Generalized Graded Unfolding Model , 2006 .
[32] Guido Makransky,et al. Critical Values for Yen’s Q3: Identification of Local Dependence in the Rasch Model Using Residual Correlations , 2017, Applied psychological measurement.
[33] Fritz Drasgow,et al. Examining assumptions about item responding in personality assessment: should ideal point methods be considered for scale development and scoring? , 2006, The Journal of applied psychology.
[34] Andrew T. Jebb,et al. Establishing Construct Continua in Construct Validation: The Process of Continuum Specification , 2018, Advances in Methods and Practices in Psychological Science.
[35] J. Cacioppo,et al. Beyond Bipolar Conceptualizations and Measures: The Case of Attitudes and Evaluative Space , 1997, Personality and social psychology review : an official journal of the Society for Personality and Social Psychology, Inc.
[36] F. Schmidt,et al. The validity and utility of selection methods in personnel psychology: Practical and theoretical implications of 85 years of research findings. , 1998 .
[37] Alberto Maydeu-Olivares,et al. Item Response Modeling of Forced-Choice Questionnaires , 2011 .
[38] D. Rubin,et al. Inference from Iterative Simulation Using Multiple Sequences , 1992 .
[39] Michael D. Maraun,et al. The Extra-Factor Phenomenon Revisited: Unidimensional Unfolding as Quadratic Factor Analysis , 2001 .
[40] Seang-Hwane Joo,et al. Development of Information Functions and Indices for the GGUM-RANK Multidimensional Forced Choice IRT Model , 2018, Journal of Educational Measurement.
[41] L. R. Goldberg. THE DEVELOPMENT OF MARKERS FOR THE BIG-FIVE FACTOR STRUCTURE , 1992 .
[42] Oleksandr S. Chernyshenko,et al. Markov Chain Monte Carlo Estimation of Item Parameters for the Generalized Graded Unfolding Model , 2006 .
[43] Murray R. Barrick,et al. Personality and Performance at the Beginning of the New Millennium: What Do We Know and Where Do We Go Next? , 2001 .
[44] Mark L. Davison,et al. On a metric, unidimensional unfolding model for attitudinal and developmental data , 1977 .
[45] Joseph G. Rosse,et al. The impact of response distortion on preemployment personality testing and hiring decisions. , 1998 .
[46] Seang-Hwane Joo,et al. Evaluating Anchor-Item Designs for Concurrent Calibration With the GGUM , 2017, Applied psychological measurement.
[47] J. S. Roberts,et al. A Q3 Statistic for Unfolding Item Response Theory Models: Assessment of Unidimensionality With Two Factors and Simple Structure , 2005 .
[48] J. S. Roberts,et al. A General Item Response Theory Model for Unfolding Unidimensional Polytomous Responses , 2000 .
[49] J. S. Roberts,et al. Characteristics of MML/EAP Parameter Estimates in the Generalized Graded Unfolding Model , 2002 .
[50] Bo Zhang,et al. Advancing and Evaluating IRT Model Data Fit Indices in Organizational Research , 2020, Organizational Research Methods.
[51] David J Weiss,et al. Psychometric Evaluation and Calibration of Health-Related Quality of Life Item Banks: Plans for the Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) , 2007, Medical care.
[52] O. Chernyshenko,et al. Latent Trait Theory Approach to Measuring Person-Organization Fit: Conceptual Rationale and Empirical Evaluation , 2009 .
[53] L. Tay,et al. Why Self-Reports of Happiness and Sadness May Not Necessarily Contradict Bipolarity: A Psychometric Review and Proposal , 2017 .
[54] Douglas H. Wedell,et al. Validity Issues in the Likert and Thurstone Approaches to Attitude Measurement , 1999 .
[55] Nathan T. Carter,et al. Test-taker reactions to ideal point measures of personality , 2020 .
[56] Vincent Ng,et al. Ideal Point Modeling of Non-cognitive Constructs: Review and Recommendations for Research , 2018, Front. Psychol..
[57] Philseok Lee,et al. Adaptive testing with the GGUM-RANK multidimensional forced choice model: Comparison of pair, triplet, and tetrad scoring , 2019, Behavior Research Methods.
[58] F. Drasgow,et al. 75 Years After Likert: Thurstone Was Right! , 2010, Industrial and Organizational Psychology.
[59] F. Drasgow,et al. An IRT Approach to Constructing and Scoring Pairwise Preference Items Involving Stimuli on Different Dimensions: The Multi-Unidimensional Pairwise-Preference Model , 2005 .
[60] Randall D. Penfield. Assessing Differential Step Functioning in Polytomous Items Using a Common Odds Ratio Estimator. , 2007 .
[61] Fritz Drasgow,et al. Constructing personality scales under the assumptions of an ideal point response process: toward increasing the flexibility of personality measures. , 2007, Psychological assessment.
[62] Christopher D. Nye,et al. Development of the Tailored Adaptive Personality Assessment System (TAPAS) to Support Army Personnel Selection and Classification Decisions , 2012 .
[63] Implementation of Marginal Bayesian Estimation with Four-Parameter Beta Prior Distributions , 1997 .
[64] Michael T. Brannick,et al. A Meta-Analytic Investigation of Job Applicant Faking on Personality Measures , 2006 .
[65] D. Thissen,et al. Local Dependence Indexes for Item Pairs Using Item Response Theory , 1997 .
[66] S. Stark,et al. Item Parameter Estimation With the General Hyperbolic Cosine Ideal Point IRT Model , 2019, Applied psychological measurement.
[67] Mark D. Reckase,et al. A Linear Logistic Multidimensional Model for Dichotomous Item Response Data , 1997 .
[68] William L. Farmer,et al. From ABLE to TAPAS: A New Generation of Personality Tests to Support Military Selection and Classification Decisions , 2014 .
[69] Robert J. Mislevy,et al. Posterior Predictive Model Checking for Multidimensionality in Item Response Theory , 2006 .
[70] Charles A. Scherbaum,et al. Examining Faking on Personality Inventories Using Unfolding Item Response Theory Models , 2013, Journal of personality assessment.
[71] F. Drasgow,et al. Examining the item response process to personality measures in high‐stakes situations: Issues of measurement validity and predictive validity , 2020, Personnel Psychology.
[72] Eean R. Crawford,et al. Hierarchical representations of the five-factor model of personality in predicting job performance: integrating three organizing frameworks with two theoretical perspectives. , 2013, The Journal of applied psychology.
[73] J. Cacioppo,et al. Relationship between attitudes and evaluative space: A critical review, with emphasis on the separability of positive and negative substrates. , 1994 .
[74] F. Drasgow,et al. Developing Ideal Intermediate Personality Items for the Ideal Point Model , 2015 .
[75] Jill E. Ellingson,et al. Personality assessment across selection and development contexts: insights into response distortion. , 2007, The Journal of applied psychology.
[76] Confirmatory Multidimensional IRT Unfolding Models for Graded-Response Items , 2016, Applied psychological measurement.