Tackling Biocomplexity with Meta-models for Species Risk Assessment

We describe results of a multi-year effort to strengthen consideration of the human dimension into endangered species risk assessments and to strengthen research capacity to understand biodiversity risk assessment in the context of coupled human-natural systems. A core group of social and biological scientists have worked with a network of more than 50 individuals from four countries to develop a conceptual framework illustrating how human-mediated processes influence biological systems and to develop tools to gather, translate, and incorporate these data into existing simulation models. A central theme of our research focused on (1) the difficulties often encountered in identifying and securing diverse bodies of expertise and information that is necessary to adequately address complex species conservation issues; and (2) the development of quantitative simulation modeling tools that could explicitly link these datasets as a way to gain deeper insight into these issues. To address these important challenges, we promote a "meta-modeling" approach where computational links are constructed between discipline-specific models already in existence. In this approach, each model can function as a powerful stand-alone program, but interaction between applications is achieved by passing data structures describing the state of the system between programs. As one example of this concept, an integrated meta-model of wildlife disease and population biology is described. A goal of this effort is to improve science-based capabilities for decision making by scientists, natural resource managers, and policy makers addressing environmental problems in general, and focusing on biodiversity risk assessment in particular.

[1]  Stephanie Bertels,et al.  Broadening the notion of governance from the organisation to the domain , 2004, Corporate Social Responsibility, Accountability and Governance.

[2]  John M. Drake,et al.  Population Viability Analysis , 2019, Encyclopedia of Theoretical Ecology.

[3]  W. Munns,et al.  Assessing Risks to Wildlife Populations from Multiple Stressors: Overview of the Problem and Research Needs. , 2006 .

[4]  Sergio Ulgiati,et al.  Energy quality, emergy, and transformity: H.T. Odum’s contributions to quantifying and understanding systems , 2004 .

[5]  Denis White,et al.  PROJECTING WILDLIFE RESPONSES TO ALTERNATIVE FUTURE LANDSCAPES IN OREGON'S WILLAMETTE BASIN , 2004 .

[6]  M. Scheffer,et al.  Impacts of multiple stressors on biodiversity and ecosystem functioning: the role of species co‐tolerance , 2004 .

[7]  Eric C. Johnson Making sense of intractable environmental conflicts: Editors: Roy J. Lewicki, Barbara Gray and Michael Elliott; Publisher: Island Press, Cost: paper US$27.50, ISBN 1-55963-931-8, order details: , 2004 .

[8]  Jeremy Hall,et al.  The challenges of innovating for sustainable development , 2003 .

[9]  Paul Beier,et al.  Population viability analysis. , 2016 .

[10]  Stephen R. Carpenter,et al.  Scenario Planning: a Tool for Conservation in an Uncertain World , 2003, Conservation Biology.

[11]  Frances Westley,et al.  Experiments in consilience : integrating social and scientific responses to save endangered species , 2003 .

[12]  C. Hardy,et al.  Inter-organizational collaboration and the dynamics of institutional fields , 2002 .

[13]  David B. Lindenmayer,et al.  How accurate are population models? Lessons from landscape-scale tests in a fragmented system , 2002 .

[14]  David J. Rapport,et al.  Transdisciplinarity: reCreating Integrated Knowledge , 2002 .

[15]  Frances Westley,et al.  A Role for Natural Resource Social Science in Biodiversity Risk Assessment , 2002 .

[16]  D. Haydon,et al.  Integrating Epidemiology into Population Viability Analysis: Managing the Risk Posed by Rabies and Canine Distemper to the Ethiopian Wolf , 2002 .

[17]  Rob Swart,et al.  Critical Challenges for Sustainability Science , 2002, Science.

[18]  C. S. Holling,et al.  Resilience and Sustainable Development: Building Adaptive Capacity in a World of Transformations , 2002, Ambio.

[19]  W. Morris,et al.  POPULATION VIABILITY ANALYSIS IN ENDANGERED SPECIES RECOVERY PLANS: PAST USE AND FUTURE IMPROVEMENTS , 2002 .

[20]  Gary P. Kofinas,et al.  Ten Heuristics for Interdisciplinary Modeling Projects , 2002, Ecosystems.

[21]  D. Lindenmayer,et al.  Small mammals, habitat patches and PVA models: a field test of model predictive ability , 2002 .

[22]  Stephen P. Ellner,et al.  Precision of Population Viability Analysis , 2002, Conservation biology : the journal of the Society for Conservation Biology.

[23]  Steven R. Beissinger,et al.  Emerging Issues in Population Viability Analysis , 2002, Conservation biology : the journal of the Society for Conservation Biology.

[24]  C. S. Holling,et al.  Resilience and adaptive cycles , 2002 .

[25]  D. Dokken,et al.  Climate change and biodiversity. , 2002 .

[26]  C. S. Holling,et al.  Panarchy Understanding Transformations in Human and Natural Systems , 2002 .

[27]  J. L. Rosenberger,et al.  Defining and Unraveling Biocomplexity , 2001 .

[28]  R. Kasperson,et al.  Sustainability Science , 2019, Critical Skills for Environmental Professionals.

[29]  Robert T. Watson,et al.  Climate Change 2001: Synthesis Report. Third Assesssment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change , 2001 .

[30]  Howard T. Odum,et al.  A Prosperous Way Down: Principles And Policies , 2001 .

[31]  Simon A. Levin,et al.  Multiple Scales and the Maintenance of Biodiversity , 2000, Ecosystems.

[32]  David B. Lindenmayer,et al.  TESTING A SIMULATION MODEL FOR POPULATION VIABILITY ANALYSIS , 2000 .

[33]  H. Resit Akçakaya,et al.  Predictive accuracy of population viability analysis in conservation biology , 2000, Nature.

[34]  Julia Marie Wondolleck,et al.  Making collaboration work , 2000 .

[35]  R. Lacy Structure of the VORTEX simulation model for population viability analysis , 2000 .

[36]  T. Ebenhard,et al.  The use of population viability in conservation planning , 2000 .

[37]  S. Pickett,et al.  Interdisciplinary Research: Maintaining the Constructive Impulse in a Culture of Criticism , 1999, Ecosystems.

[38]  C. Redman Human Dimensions of Ecosystem Studies , 1999, Ecosystems.

[39]  David N. Wear,et al.  Challenges to Interdisciplinary Discourse , 1999, Ecosystems.

[40]  D. Lindenmayer,et al.  Integrating demographic and genetic studies of the Greater Glider Petauroides volans in fragmented forests: predicting movement patterns and rates for future testing , 1999 .

[41]  Simon A. Levin,et al.  Fragile Dominion: Complexity and the Commons , 1999 .

[42]  E. Wilson Consilience: The Unity of Knowledge , 1998 .

[43]  G. Hill,et al.  Enhancing Bachman's sparrow habitat via management of red-cockaded woodpeckers , 1998 .

[44]  Jerome K. Vanclay,et al.  FLORES: for exploring land use options in forested landscapes , 1998 .

[45]  Harrie Vredenburg,et al.  Interorganizational Collaboration and the Preservation of Global Biodiversity , 1997 .

[46]  David B. Lindenmayer,et al.  Ranking Conservation and Timber Management Options for Leadbeater's Possum in Southeastern Australia Using Population Viability Analysis , 1996 .

[47]  Howard T. Odum,et al.  Environmental Accounting: Emergy and Environmental Decision Making , 1995 .

[48]  H. Ronald Pulliam,et al.  Potential Effects of a Forest Management Plan on Bachman's Sparrows (Aimophila aestivalis): Linking a Spatially Explicit Model with GIS , 1995 .

[49]  D. Lindenmayer,et al.  The Conservation Of Arboreal Marsupials In The Montane Ash Forests Of The Central Highlands Of Victoria, South-Eastern Australia - VII. Modelling The Persistence Of Leadbeater's Possum In Response To Modified Timber Harvesting Practices , 1995 .

[50]  David B. Lindenmayer,et al.  A simulation study of the impacts of population subdivision on the mountain brushtail possum Trichosurus caninus Ogilby (Phalangeridae: Marsupialia), in south-eastern Australia. II. Loss of genetic variation within and between subpopulations , 1995 .

[51]  Graeme Caughley,et al.  Directions in conservation biology , 1994 .

[52]  David B. Lindenmayer,et al.  Population viability analysis as a tool in wildlife conservation policy: With reference to Australia , 1993 .

[53]  Robert C. Lacy,et al.  VORTEX: a computer simulation model for population viability analysis , 1993 .

[54]  Scott Ferson,et al.  Risk assessment in conservation biology , 1993 .

[55]  Robert McKelvey,et al.  A Dynamic Analysis of Northern Spotted Owl Viability in a Fragmented Forest Landscape , 1992 .

[56]  M. Boyce,et al.  Population Viability Analysis , 1992 .

[57]  Robert Kramer,et al.  Collaborating: Finding Common Ground for Multiparty Problems , 1990 .

[58]  Thomas A. Heberlein,et al.  Improving interdisciplinary research: Integrating the social and natural sciences , 1988 .

[59]  T. L. Scheid-Cook,et al.  A Sand County Almanac , 1949 .