Triads at the interface between supply networks and logistics service networks

The research and literature on supply networks and on logistics service networks has largely been separated. In practice, the ‘two networks’ are integrated since the activities carried out in them are always subject to interdependencies and thus in need of coordination. In this paper we focus on the triads consisting of buyers and suppliers of goods and of the logistics service providers (LSPs) that take care of the logistics services between the two. We argue that these particular triads are generic in nature while still seldom considered as of importance. The latter may be an effect from transport services being considered by many firms as a non-strategic purchasing category. However, this may change as the need to increase the efficiency and effectiveness of transport services, as part of broader logistics service packages, is becoming one of the key issues for dealing with the environmental impact of transport. Based on our scrutiny of the generic triads connecting supply networks and logistics service networks we discuss three themes with implications for research and practice; (1) the nature of the connections between the dyads in the triads, (2) the triads’ functions in relation to fourth parties in the supply network, and (3) the triads’ functions in relation to fourth parties in the logistics service networks.

[1]  A. Dubois,et al.  Supply chains and interdependence: a theoretical analysis , 2004 .

[2]  H. Håkansson,et al.  Learning in Networks , 1999 .

[3]  H. Virum,et al.  THIRD PARTY LOGISTICS DEVELOPMENT IN EUROPE , 1993 .

[4]  Valentina Carbone,et al.  Growth and Relational Strategies Used by the European Logistics Service Providers: Rationale and Outcomes , 2005 .

[5]  J. R. Carter,et al.  THE IMPACT OF TRANSPORTATION COSTS ON SUPPLY CHAIN MANAGEMENT. IN: TRANSPORT LOGISTICS , 2002 .

[6]  Thomas Y. Choi,et al.  Taking the leap from dyads to triads: Buyer–supplier relationships in supply networks , 2009 .

[7]  Dan Andersson,et al.  Procurement of logistics services—a minutes work or a multi-year project? , 2002 .

[8]  Daniel J. Flint,et al.  PERSPECTIVES ON THE EVOLUTION OF LOGISTICS THOUGHT. , 1997 .

[9]  S. Hertz,et al.  Strategic development of third party logistics providers , 2003 .

[10]  Helena Forslund,et al.  Order‐to‐delivery process performance in delivery scheduling environments , 2008 .

[11]  S. Hertz,et al.  Networks and capabilities as characteristics of logistics firms , 2011 .

[12]  R. Weaver,et al.  The influence of relationship quality on the innovation capacity in traditional food chains , 2013 .

[13]  James L. Hoyt,et al.  From arms‐length to collaborative relationships in the supply chain , 2000 .

[14]  Lars-Erik Gadde,et al.  Managing Interfaces with Suppliers , 1999 .

[15]  Lars-Erik Gadde,et al.  Supply Network Strategies , 2001 .

[16]  Thomas Y. Choi,et al.  Supplier–supplier relationships in buyer–supplier–supplier triads: Implications for supplier performance , 2010 .

[17]  P. Andersen,et al.  Bridges over troubled water: suppliers as connective nodes in global supply networks , 2005 .

[18]  Amit Sachan,et al.  Review of supply chain management and logistics research , 2005 .

[19]  M. Westerlund,et al.  Purchasing strategies in supply relationships , 2009 .

[20]  Martin Spring,et al.  Third party logistics : a literature review and research agenda , 2007 .

[21]  Thomas Y. Choi,et al.  Structural investigation of supply networks: A social network analysis approach , 2011 .

[22]  Thomas Ritter,et al.  Interconnected levels of Multi-Stage Marketing – A Triadic approach , 2012 .

[23]  H. Håkansson,et al.  Developing relationships in business networks , 1995 .

[24]  A. Holma Interpersonal interaction in business triads—Case studies in corporate travel purchasing , 2012 .

[25]  W. V. D. Valk Buying business services , 2009 .

[26]  Amrik S. Sohal,et al.  Third party logistics services usage by large Australian firms , 1996 .

[27]  Robert C Lieb,et al.  A COMPARISON OF THE USE OF THIRD-PARTY LOGISTICS SERVICES BY LARGE AMERICAN MANUFACTURERS, 1991, 1994, 1995 AND 1996. , 1996 .

[28]  Thomas Y. Choi,et al.  TRIADS IN SERVICES OUTSOURCING: BRIDGE, BRIDGE DECAY AND BRIDGE TRANSFER , 2009 .

[29]  Anna Dubois,et al.  Comment on “Taking the leap from dyads to triads: Buyer–supplier relationships in supply networks” by Choi and Wu: To leap or not to leap: Triads as arbitrary subsets of networks of connected dyads , 2009 .

[30]  Anu Bask,et al.  Relationships among TPL providers and members of supply chains – a strategic perspective , 2001 .

[31]  P. V. Laarhoven,et al.  Third‐Party Logistics: Is There a Future? , 1999 .

[32]  Miriam Wilhelm,et al.  Managing coopetition through horizontal supply chain relations: Linking dyadic and network levels of analysis , 2011 .

[33]  A. Dubois,et al.  Co-operating and competing in supply networks: Making sense of a triadic sourcing strategy , 2008 .

[34]  Stefanie L. Boyer,et al.  Research opportunities in supply chain management , 2010 .

[35]  C. Harland Supply Chain Management: Relationships, Chains and Networks , 1996 .

[36]  H. L. Sink,et al.  A MANAGERIAL FRAMEWORK FOR THE ACQUISITION OF THIRD-PARTY LOGISTICS SERVICES. , 1997 .

[37]  V. Martinez,et al.  Managing triads in a military avionics service maintenance network in Taiwan , 2010 .

[38]  Thomas Y. Choi,et al.  Supply Management Under High Goal Incongruence: An Empirical Examination of Disintermediation in the Aerospace Supply Chain , 2008, Decis. Sci..

[39]  J. Holmström,et al.  A manufacturer moving upstream: triadic collaboration for service delivery , 2013 .

[40]  Jan-Åke Törnroos,et al.  The role of embeddedness in the evolution of business networks , 1998 .

[41]  Patrik Jonsson,et al.  LOGISTICS AND SUPPLY CHAIN MANAGEMENT , 2022 .

[42]  Mats Abrahamsson,et al.  Model of Tiering in Third Party Logistics with a Service Parts Distribution Case Study , 1998 .

[43]  Peter Thilenius,et al.  International business-relationship triads , 2004 .

[44]  Nathalie Fabbe-Costes,et al.  Supply chain integration: the role of logistics service providers , 2008 .

[45]  Thomas Y. Choi,et al.  TRIADS IN SUPPLY NETWORKS: THEORIZING BUYER–SUPPLIER–SUPPLIER RELATIONSHIPS , 2009 .

[46]  R. Burt Structural Holes and Good Ideas1 , 2004, American Journal of Sociology.

[47]  Karen S. Cook,et al.  Network Connections and the Distribution of Power in Exchange Networks , 1988, American Journal of Sociology.

[48]  Rafael Wittek,et al.  Structural Holes , 2014, Encyclopedia of Social Network Analysis and Mining.

[49]  Mark S. Granovetter The Strength of Weak Ties , 1973, American Journal of Sociology.

[50]  Thomas Ritter A Framework for Analyzing Interconnectedness of Relationships , 2000 .

[51]  G. Simmel The sociology of Georg Simmel , 1950 .

[52]  R. Lamming,et al.  A Taxonomy of Supply Networks , 2001 .

[53]  Julie J. Gentry Carrier involvement in buyer‐supplier strategic partnerships , 1996 .

[54]  Thomas Y. Choi,et al.  STRUCTURAL EMBEDDEDNESS AND SUPPLIER MANAGEMENT: A NETWORK PERSPECTIVE* , 2008 .

[55]  Virpi Havila International Business-Relationship Triads : A Study of the Changing Role of the Intermediating Actor , 1996 .

[56]  A. Cox A research agenda for supply chain and business management thinking , 1999 .

[57]  A. Marasco Third-party logistics: A literature review , 2008 .

[58]  J. H. Dyer,et al.  Creating and managing a high‐performance knowledge‐sharing network: the Toyota case , 2000 .

[59]  Thomas Y. Choi,et al.  Supplier–supplier relationships in the buyer–supplier triad: Building theories from eight case studies , 2005 .

[60]  Stephen Hancocks,et al.  Two's company, three's a crowd , 2004, British Dental Journal.

[61]  D. Ford,et al.  Understanding Business Markets , 1997 .

[62]  Joan M Phillips,et al.  A Balance Theory Perspective of Triadic Supply Chain Relationships , 1998 .

[63]  Lars-Erik Gadde Activity Coordination and Resource Combining in Distribution Networks - Implications for Relationship Involvement and the Relationship Atmosphere , 2004 .

[64]  Zhaohui Wu,et al.  Go ahead, leap: Triads and their practical and theoretical import: In response to “To leap or not to leap: Triads as arbitrary subsets of networks of connected dyads” by Anna Dubois , 2009 .

[65]  Dan Andersson,et al.  Linking to global logistics value chains: an imperative for developing countries , 2008 .

[66]  Melvyn Peters,et al.  Third‐party logistics in Europe – five years later , 2000 .

[67]  J. Mentzer,et al.  Toward a unified theory of logistics , 2004 .

[68]  Thomas Johnsen,et al.  An initial classification of supply networks , 2000 .

[69]  David Obstfeld Social Networks, the Tertius Iungens Orientation, and Involvement in Innovation , 2005 .

[70]  D. Lambert,et al.  Issues in Supply Chain Management , 2000 .

[71]  J. Iwaarden,et al.  Monitoring in service triads consisting of buyers, subcontractors and end customers , 2011 .

[72]  H. Gerth,et al.  The Sociology of Georg Simmel. , 1950 .

[73]  P. K. Bagchi,et al.  LOGISTICAL ALLIANCES -- TRENDS AND PROSPECTS IN INTEGRATED EUROPE. , 1998 .

[74]  Graham Sharman,et al.  Logistics Alliances: The European Experience , 1994 .

[75]  A. Holma Relationship Development in Business Triads—Case Studies in Corporate Travel Management , 2010 .

[76]  Geoffrey G. Bell,et al.  Benefiting from network position: firm capabilities, structural holes, and performance , 2005 .

[77]  R. Chapman,et al.  Innovation in logistic services and the new business model : a conceptual framework , 2003 .