Workload control: Successful implementation taking a contingency‐based view of production planning and control

Purpose – The purpose of this paper is to present a successful implementation of a comprehensive workload control (WLC) concept; and to describe the associated implementation process. Design/methodology/approach – Longitudinal action research using a contingency‐based approach to ensure alignment between the case company and the characteristics of the WLC approach; and the resulting expected improvements in performance. A set of 17 issues and responses from the literature is used as a checklist for implementing WLC. Findings – Performance improvements include: reduced lead times; significant improvement in lateness and tardiness; reduced costs; improved internal and external co‐ordination; and higher quality. The relevance of 15 of the 17 implementation issues is confirmed along with the same response as in previous research for ten issues and an improved response for five issues. In addition, three new issues are identified and addressed. Research limitations/implications – Dependability was a more important competitive priority in this company than speed; and, therefore, the ability of WLC to reduce lead times was not fully assessed. Practical implications – The importance of a contingency‐based approach to production planning and control is confirmed. Comprehensive WLC approaches are closely aligned with the high‐variety/low‐volume context of make‐to‐order (MTO) companies. Originality/value – This is the first paper that empirically demonstrates performance improvements resulting from WLC alongside a detailed discussion of the implementation process. Few examples of successful implementations have been published previously, and these tend to treat the implementation process as a “black box”. Where more detail on the implementation process has been given in previous studies, evidence of effectiveness in practice was not provided.

[1]  Hubert Missbauer,et al.  Lot sizing in workload control systems , 2002 .

[2]  John R. Shook,et al.  Learning to See: Value Stream Mapping to Create Value and , 1998 .

[3]  P. Checkland From framework through experience to learning: The essential nature of action research , 1991 .

[4]  Mark Stevenson,et al.  A review of production planning and control: the applicability of key concepts to the make-to-order industry , 2005 .

[5]  D. Coghlan,et al.  Action research for operations management , 2002 .

[6]  Timothy D. Fry,et al.  Order review/release in the absence of adherence to formal scheduling policies , 1999 .

[7]  Cristovao Silva,et al.  Optimising workload norms: the influence of shop floor characteristics on setting workload norms for the workload control concept , 2011 .

[8]  C. Rauch-Geelhaar,et al.  Gaming in industrial management - quality and competence in advanced training , 2003 .

[9]  K. Lewin Action Research and Minority Problems , 1946 .

[10]  Mark Stevenson Refining a Workload Control (WLC) concept: a case study , 2006 .

[11]  Wolfgang Bechte Load-oriented manufacturing control just-in-time production for job shops , 1994 .

[12]  K. Lewin Frontiers in Group Dynamics , 1947 .

[13]  Roger G. Schroeder,et al.  Six Sigma: Definition and underlying theory , 2008 .

[14]  Mark Stevenson,et al.  Aggregate load-oriented workload control: A review and a re-classification of a key approach , 2006 .

[15]  Brian G. Kingsman,et al.  A Decision Support System for Job Release in Make‐to‐order Companies , 1991 .

[16]  Christopher A. Voss,et al.  Contingency research in operations management practices , 2008 .

[17]  Ziaul Huq,et al.  BPR through ERP: Avoiding change management pitfalls , 2006 .

[18]  Wolfgang Bechte Theory and practice of load-oriented manufacturing control , 1988 .

[19]  Hans-Peter Wiendahl,et al.  Load-Oriented Manufacturing Control , 1994 .

[20]  Roger G. Schroeder,et al.  A FRAMEWORK FOR QUALITY MANAGEMENT RESEARCH AND AN ASSOCIATED MEASUREMENT INSTRUMENT , 1994 .

[21]  Paul Coughlan,et al.  Designing and Implementing Collaborative Improvement in the Extended Manufacturing Enterprise: Action Learning and Action Research (ALAR) in CO-IMPROVE. , 2006 .

[22]  Ihsan Sabuncuoglu,et al.  A Load-based and Due-date-oriented Approach to Order Review/Release in Job Shops , 2000, Decis. Sci..

[23]  Ali Yakhlef,et al.  Customer involvement in new service development: a conversational approach , 2004 .

[24]  Gerard Gaalman,et al.  Grouping machines for effective workload control , 2006 .

[25]  Trevor Wood-Harper,et al.  A critical perspective on action research as a method for information systems research , 1996, J. Inf. Technol..

[26]  Antti Tenhiälä,et al.  Contingency theory of capacity planning: The link between process types and planning methods , 2011 .

[27]  Brian G. Kingsman,et al.  Modelling input-output workload control for dynamic capacity planning in production planning systems , 2000 .

[28]  Brian G. Kingsman,et al.  The relative contributions of input and output controls on the performance of a workload control system in Make-To-Order companies , 2002 .

[29]  Tarun Gupta,et al.  An empirical study of just‐in‐time and total quality management principles implementation in manufacturing firms in the USA , 1997 .

[30]  Jean Hartley,et al.  Case study research , 2004 .

[31]  R. Yin Case Study Research: Design and Methods , 1984 .

[32]  Mark Stevenson,et al.  Investigating implementation issues for workload control: A comparative case study analysis , 2008 .

[33]  George Q. Huang,et al.  Integrating order review/release and dispatching rules for assembly job shop scheduling using a simulation approach , 2011 .

[34]  Gerard Gaalman,et al.  Evaluating a framework to diagnose delivery reliability performance: Results from three case studies , 2008 .

[35]  R. Westbrook Action research: a new paradigm for research in production andoperations management , 1995 .

[36]  Mark Stevenson,et al.  The theory and practice of workload control: A research agenda and implementation strategy , 2011 .

[37]  Jan Olhager,et al.  Simulating production and inventory control systems: a learning approach to operational excellence , 2006 .

[38]  S. T Enns,et al.  The effectiveness of input control based on aggregate versus bottleneck work loads , 2002 .

[39]  R. Schroeder,et al.  Relationships between implementation of TQM, JIT, and TPM and manufacturing performance , 2001 .

[40]  Gerard Gaalman,et al.  Production planning and control in SMEs: time for change , 2009 .

[41]  Joel D. Wisner,et al.  A review of the order release policy research , 1995 .

[42]  James P. Womack,et al.  Lean Thinking: Banish Waste and Create Wealth in Your Corporation , 1996 .

[43]  R. Cigolini,et al.  An experimental investigation on workload limiting methods within ORR policies in a job shop environment , 2002 .

[44]  C. Eden,et al.  Action Research for Management Research , 1996 .

[45]  Brian G. Kingsman,et al.  The effect of workload control (WLC) on performance in make-to-order companies , 1998 .

[46]  T. C. Powell Total Quality Management as Competitive Advantage , 1995 .

[47]  Morten Levin Action research and the research community , 2003 .

[48]  Gerard Gaalman,et al.  The order progress diagram: A supportive tool for diagnosing dependability in make-to-order companies , 2006 .

[49]  Gerard Gaalman,et al.  Semi-interchangeable machines: implications for workload control , 2007 .

[50]  J. W. M Bertrand,et al.  Workload based order release and productivity: a missing link , 2002 .

[51]  Brian G. Kingsman,et al.  Responding to customer enquiries in make-to-order companies Problems and solutions , 1996 .

[52]  Wallace J. Hopp,et al.  To Pull or Not to Pull: What Is the Question? , 2004, Manuf. Serv. Oper. Manag..

[53]  Bart L. MacCarthy,et al.  Organizational, Systems and Human Issues in Production Planning, Scheduling and Control , 2006 .

[54]  Ronald Maier,et al.  Implementing process-oriented knowledge management strategies , 2003, J. Knowl. Manag..

[55]  Chris Argyris,et al.  Intervention Theory and Method. , 1974 .

[56]  Le Gruenwald,et al.  Real-time due-date promising by build-to-order environments , 2004 .

[57]  Cristovao Silva,et al.  Workload control release mechanisms: from practice back to theory building , 2010 .

[58]  Martin Land,et al.  Workload control concepts in job shops A critical assessment , 1995 .

[59]  M. X. Weng,et al.  Multi-agent-based workload control for make-to-order manufacturing , 2008 .

[60]  Linda Hendry,et al.  Production planning for an artists studio -- A case study , 1993 .

[61]  Roger G. Schroeder,et al.  Relationship Between JIT and TQM: Practices and Performance , 1995 .

[62]  Satya S. Chakravorty,et al.  Production , Manufacturing and Logistics The evolution of manufacturing cells : An action research study , 2007 .

[63]  Lawrence D. Fredendall,et al.  Concerning the theory of workload control , 2010, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[64]  Cristovao Silva,et al.  Three decades of workload control research: a systematic review of the literature , 2011 .

[65]  R. McAdam,et al.  Implementing innovation management in manufacturing SMEs: a longitudinal study , 2007 .

[66]  Yuan Huang,et al.  Workload control (WLC) : success in practice , 2010 .

[67]  Cuneyt Eroglu,et al.  Lean, leaner, too lean? The inventory‐performance link revisited , 2011 .

[68]  Linda Hendry,et al.  The development and application of an interactive end-user training tool: part of an implementation strategy for workload control , 2009 .

[69]  N. Saccani,et al.  Combining make-to-order and make-to-stock inventory policies: an empirical application to a manufacturing SME , 2009 .

[70]  Michael Grüninger,et al.  An ontology of quality for enterprise modelling , 1995, Proceedings 4th IEEE Workshop on Enabling Technologies: Infrastructure for Collaborative Enterprises (WET ICE '95).

[71]  Cristovao Silva,et al.  Theoretical development of a workload control methodology: evidence from two case studies , 2008 .

[72]  Gerard Gaalman,et al.  Exploring applicability of the workload control concept , 2004 .

[73]  Jung-Su Song,et al.  Delivery Date Decision Support System for the Large Scale Make-to-Order Manufacturing Companies: An Electric Motor Company Case , 1998 .

[74]  L. Frewer,et al.  Consumer perceptions of traceability: A cross-national comparison of the associated benefits , 2008 .

[75]  Martin Land,et al.  Parameters and sensitivity in workload control , 2006 .

[76]  Rui Alberto F. S. Alves,et al.  A methodology for planning and controlling workload in a job-shop: a four-way decision-making problem , 2009 .

[77]  G. Gaalman,et al.  The influence of shop characteristics on workload control , 2000 .

[78]  A. Mercer,et al.  Strike Rate Matrices for Integrating Marketing and Production During the Tendering Process in Make‐to‐Order Subcontractors , 1997 .

[79]  Fariborz Jolai,et al.  Hierarchical production planning and scheduling in make-to-order environments: reaching short and reliable delivery dates , 2009 .

[80]  Jiju Antony,et al.  Critical success factors for the successful implementation of six sigma projects in organisations , 2002 .

[81]  Gary L. Hogg,et al.  Workload control in the semiconductor industry , 2002 .

[82]  William G. Sullivan,et al.  EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT DECISIONS AND LEAN MANUFACTURING , 2002 .