Good vibrations: Human interval timing in the vibrotactile modality

This article reports a detailed examination of timing in the vibrotactile modality and comparison with that of visual and auditory modalities. Three experiments investigated human timing in the vibrotactile modality. In Experiment 1, a staircase threshold procedure with a standard duration of 1,000 ms revealed a difference threshold of 160.35 ms for vibrotactile stimuli, which was significantly higher than that for auditory stimuli (103.25 ms) but not significantly lower than that obtained for visual stimuli (196.76 ms). In Experiment 2, verbal estimation revealed a significant slope difference between vibrotactile and auditory timing, but not between vibrotactile and visual timing. That is, both vibrations and lights were judged as shorter than sounds, and this comparative difference was greater at longer durations than at shorter ones. In Experiment 3, performance on a temporal generalization task showed characteristics consistent with the predications of scalar expectancy theory (SET: Gibbon, 1977) with both mean accuracy and scalar variance exhibited. The results were modelled using the modified Church and Gibbon model (MCG; derived by Wearden, 1992, from Church & Gibbon 1982). The model was found to give an excellent fit to the data, and the parameter values obtained were compared with those for visual and auditory temporal generalization. The pattern of results suggest that timing in the vibrotactile modality conforms to SET and that the internal clock speed for vibrotactile stimuli is significantly slower than that for auditory stimuli, which is logically consistent with the significant differences in difference threshold that were obtained.

[1]  S. Goldstone,et al.  Intersensory comparisons of temporal judgments. , 1959, Journal of experimental psychology.

[2]  S. Kitazawa,et al.  Bayesian calibration of simultaneity in tactile temporal order judgment , 2006, Nature Neuroscience.

[3]  Sigm Exner,et al.  Experimentelle Untersuchung der einfachsten psychischen Processe , 2005, Archiv für die gesamte Physiologie des Menschen und der Tiere.

[4]  Robert B. Welch,et al.  Contributions of audition and vision to temporal rate perception , 1986, Perception & psychophysics.

[5]  Christian S. Jensen,et al.  Temporal Generalization , 2009, Encyclopedia of Database Systems.

[6]  Sigmund Exner,et al.  Experimentelle Untersuchung der einfachsten psychischen Processe , 1875, Archiv für die gesamte Physiologie des Menschen und der Tiere.

[7]  J. Wearden,et al.  Why “Sounds Are Judged Longer than Lights”: Application of a Model of the Internal Clock in Humans , 1998, The Quarterly journal of experimental psychology. B, Comparative and physiological psychology.

[8]  C Kaernbach,et al.  Simple adaptive testing with the weighted up-down method , 1991, Perception & psychophysics.

[9]  I. Hirsh,et al.  Perceived order in different sense modalities. , 1961, Journal of experimental psychology.

[10]  John H Wearden,et al.  Internal clock processes and the filled-duration illusion. , 2007, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[11]  F. Macar,et al.  Sensory effects on judgments of short time-intervals , 1998, Psychological research.

[12]  W. Bevan,et al.  The perceived duration of auditory and visual intervals: cross-modal comparison and interaction. , 1961, American Journal of Psychology.

[13]  J. Gibbon Scalar expectancy theory and Weber's law in animal timing. , 1977 .

[14]  Thomas H. Rammsa Yer An experimental comparison of the weighted up-down method and the transformed up-down method , 1992 .

[15]  J. Wearden,et al.  When do auditory/visual differences in duration judgements occur? , 2006, Quarterly journal of experimental psychology.

[16]  C. Spence,et al.  On measuring selective attention to an expected sensory modality , 1997, Perception & psychophysics.

[17]  S. Goldstone,et al.  DIRECT COMPARISON OF AUDITORY AND VISUAL DURATIONS. , 1964, Journal of experimental psychology.

[18]  S. Goldstone,et al.  Auditory-Visual Differences in Human Temporal Judgment , 1972, Perceptual and motor skills.

[19]  Jonathon D. Crystal,et al.  The psychology of time , 2007, Behavioural Processes.

[20]  S. Goldstone,et al.  Studies of Auditory-Visual Differences in Human Time Judgment: 1. Sounds are Judged Longer than Lights , 1974, Perceptual and motor skills.

[21]  J. Gibbon,et al.  Differential effects of auditory and visual signals on clock speed and temporal memory. , 2000, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[22]  S. Goldstone,et al.  Judgment of Filled and Unfilled Durations: Intersensory Factors , 1963, Perceptual and motor skills.

[23]  S. Goldstone Production and Reproduction of Duration: Intersensory Comparisons , 1968, Perceptual and motor skills.

[24]  Louis Buffardi,et al.  Factors affecting the filled-duration illusion in the auditory, tactual, and visual modalities , 1971 .

[25]  H. Levitt Transformed up-down methods in psychoacoustics. , 1971, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[26]  J. Wearden Temporal generalization in humans. , 1992 .

[27]  Gerald Westheimer,et al.  Discrimination of short time intervals by the human observer , 1999, Experimental Brain Research.

[28]  J. Wearden,et al.  “Beyond the fields we know...”: exploring and developing scalar timing theory , 1999, Behavioural Processes.

[29]  P. F. Gridley The Discrimination of Short Intervals of Time by Finger-Tip and by Ear , 1932 .

[30]  L. D. Goodfellow,et al.  An Empirical Comparison of Audition, Vision, and Touch in the Discrimination of Short Intervals of Time , 1934 .

[31]  C. Spence,et al.  Multisensory prior entry. , 2001, Journal of experimental psychology. General.