Armless underwater manipulation using a small deployable agent vehicle connected by a smart cable

Abstract Conventional underwater manipulation is performed by a remotely operated vehicle (ROV) equipped with a rigidly connected multi-link arm. However, accurate manipulation requires the ROV to have excellent maneuverability, which limits the design flexibility and capabilities of the vehicle. This paper instead proposes the use of a small, deployable, and highly maneuverable agent ROV as an end effector, which is connected to the main vehicle by a flexible smart cable. This cable tracks the relative position of the agent, thus eliminating the need for additional positioning sensors and allowing significant size reduction for the agent. In addition, to compensate for the limited lifting capability of the small agent, it is equipped with active buoyancy control. The proposed system can be applied to common autonomous underwater vehicles (AUVs) with minimal modification for coarse station-keeping. The whole system is operated as a conventional AUV under normal operating conditions, but the agent is deployed when manipulation or precise monitoring is necessary. Numerical simulations were performed for dynamic analysis and prototype design of the agent vehicle, and this design was implemented as a model-scale system for experiments in a test tank. This implementation confirmed the feasibility and potential capabilities of the proposed manipulation system concept.

[1]  T. Maki,et al.  Photo Mosaicing of Tagiri Shallow Vent Area by the AUV "Tri-Dog 1" using a SLAM based Navigation Scheme , 2006, OCEANS 2006.

[2]  Junku Yuh,et al.  Underwater autonomous manipulation for intervention missions AUVs , 2009 .

[3]  Lee A. Danisch,et al.  Spatially continuous six-degrees-of-freedom position and orientation sensor , 1999, Other Conferences.

[4]  Lionel Lapierre,et al.  Position/Force Control of an Underwater Mobile Manipulator , 2003, J. Field Robotics.

[5]  J. Vaganay,et al.  Ship Hull Inspection with the HAUV: US Navy and NATO Demonstrations Results , 2006, OCEANS 2006.

[6]  Junku Yuh,et al.  Application of adaptive disturbance observer control to an underwater manipulator , 2001, Proceedings 2001 ICRA. IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation (Cat. No.01CH37164).

[7]  Junku Yuh,et al.  Underwater robotics , 2000, Proceedings 2000 ICRA. Millennium Conference. IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation. Symposia Proceedings (Cat. No.00CH37065).

[8]  Lee A. Danisch.  Bend-enhanced fiber optic sensors , 1993, Other Conferences.

[9]  Nilanjan Sarkar,et al.  External force control for underwater vehicle-manipulator systems , 2001, IEEE Trans. Robotics Autom..

[10]  Tamaki Ura,et al.  Development of an Underwater Modular Robot System For Autonomous Manipulation Tasks , 2005 .

[11]  Nilanjan Sarkar,et al.  Coordinated motion planning and control of autonomous underwater vehicle-manipulator systems subject to drag optimization , 2001 .

[12]  Tamaki Ura,et al.  Experiments On a System of Multi-AUV Interlinked With a Smart Cable For Autonomous Inspection of Underwater Structures , 2004 .

[13]  Santhakumar Mohan,et al.  Indirect adaptive control of an autonomous underwater vehicle-manipulator system for underwater manipulation tasks , 2012 .

[14]  Lee A. Danisch,et al.  Spatially continuous six degree of freedom position and orientation sensor , 1999 .

[15]  J. Yuh,et al.  Design of a semi-autonomous underwater vehicle for intervention missions (SAUVIM) , 1998, Proceedings of 1998 International Symposium on Underwater Technology.

[16]  Hayato Kondo,et al.  Navigation of autonomous underwater vehicles based on artificial underwater landmarks , 2001, MTS/IEEE Oceans 2001. An Ocean Odyssey. Conference Proceedings (IEEE Cat. No.01CH37295).