Following Eye Gaze Activates a Patch in the Posterior Temporal Cortex That Is not Part of the Human “Face Patch” System

Abstract Humans follow another person’s eye gaze to objects of interest to the other, thereby establishing joint attention, a first step toward developing a theory of the other’s mind. Previous functional MRI studies agree that a “gaze-following patch” (GFP) of cortex close to the posterior superior temporal sulcus (STS) is specifically implicated in eye gaze-following. The location of the GFP is in the vicinity of the posterior members of the core face-processing system that consists of distinct patches in ventral visual cortex, the STS, and frontal cortex, also involved in processing information on the eyes. To test whether the GFP might correspond to one of the posterior face patches, we compared the pattern of blood oxygenation level–dependent (BOLD) imaging contrasts reflecting the passive vision of static faces with the one evoked by shifts of attention guided by the eye gaze of others. The viewing of static faces revealed the face patch system. On the other hand, eye gaze-following activated a cortical patch (the GFP) with its activation maximum separated by more than 24 mm in the right and 19 mm in the left hemisphere from the nearest face patch, the STS face area (FA). This segregation supports a distinct function of the GFP, different from the elementary processing of facial information.

[1]  Doris Y. Tsao,et al.  A Cortical Region Consisting Entirely of Face-Selective Cells , 2006, Science.

[2]  T. Allison,et al.  Social perception from visual cues: role of the STS region , 2000, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[3]  Timothy J. Andrews,et al.  Neural responses to rigidly moving faces displaying shifts in social attention investigated with fMRI and MEG , 2010, Neuropsychologia.

[4]  G. McCarthy,et al.  Neural basis of eye gaze processing deficits in autism. , 2005, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[5]  V. Bruce,et al.  You must see the point: automatic processing of cues to the direction of social attention. , 2000, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[6]  T. Allison,et al.  Temporal Cortex Activation in Humans Viewing Eye and Mouth Movements , 1998, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[7]  William Hyde Wollaston,et al.  XIII. On the apparent direction of eyes in a portrait , 1824, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London.

[8]  Karl J. Friston,et al.  How Many Subjects Constitute a Study? , 1999, NeuroImage.

[9]  A. Kingstone,et al.  The eyes have it! Reflexive orienting is triggered by nonpredictive gaze , 1998 .

[10]  T. Allison,et al.  Brain activation evoked by perception of gaze shifts: the influence of context , 2003, Neuropsychologia.

[11]  T. Allison,et al.  Functional anatomy of biological motion perception in posterior temporal cortex: an FMRI study of eye, mouth and hand movements. , 2005, Cerebral cortex.

[12]  Karolina Marciniak,et al.  Monkeys head-gaze following is fast, precise and not fully suppressible , 2015, Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[13]  D. Povinelli,et al.  Mindblindness. An Essay on Autism and Theory of Mind Simon Baron-Cohen 1995 , 1996, Trends in Neurosciences.

[14]  S. Baron-Cohen How to build a baby that can read minds: Cognitive mechanisms in mindreading. , 1994 .

[15]  J. Haxby,et al.  The distributed human neural system for face perception , 2000, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[16]  J. Haxby,et al.  Distinct representations of eye gaze and identity in the distributed human neural system for face perception , 2000, Nature Neuroscience.

[17]  Doris Y. Tsao,et al.  Comparing face patch systems in macaques and humans , 2008, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[18]  N. Kanwisher,et al.  The Fusiform Face Area: A Module in Human Extrastriate Cortex Specialized for Face Perception , 1997, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[19]  Conny F. Schmidt,et al.  Face perception is mediated by a distributed cortical network , 2005, Brain Research Bulletin.

[20]  S. Shimojo,et al.  Gaze bias both reflects and influences preference , 2003, Nature Neuroscience.

[21]  Christopher J. Fox,et al.  Defining the face processing network: Optimization of the functional localizer in fMRI , 2009, Human brain mapping.

[22]  N. Sadato,et al.  Attention to emotion modulates fMRI activity in human right superior temporal sulcus. , 2001, Brain research. Cognitive brain research.

[23]  N. Kanwisher,et al.  The fusiform face area subserves face perception, not generic within-category identification , 2004, Nature Neuroscience.

[24]  K. Paller,et al.  Brain networks for analyzing eye gaze. , 2003, Brain research. Cognitive brain research.

[25]  P. Thier,et al.  Disparate substrates for head gaze following and face perception in the monkey superior temporal sulcus , 2014, eLife.

[26]  M. Tomasello,et al.  Reliance on head versus eyes in the gaze following of great apes and human infants: the cooperative eye hypothesis. , 2007, Journal of human evolution.

[27]  Peter Thier,et al.  Dissociable Roles of the Superior Temporal Sulcus and the Intraparietal Sulcus in Joint Attention: A Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging Study , 2008, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[28]  N. Emery,et al.  The eyes have it: the neuroethology, function and evolution of social gaze , 2000, Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews.

[29]  Rafael Malach,et al.  Conjunction group analysis: An alternative to mixed/random effect analysis , 2007, NeuroImage.

[30]  Peter Thier,et al.  The posterior superior temporal sulcus is involved in social communication not specific for the eyes , 2008, Neuropsychologia.

[31]  Skyler T. Hawk,et al.  Presentation and validation of the Radboud Faces Database , 2010 .

[32]  C. Moore,et al.  Targets and cues: gaze-following in children with autism. , 1998, Journal of child psychology and psychiatry, and allied disciplines.

[33]  J. Haxby,et al.  Neural response to the visual familiarity of faces , 2006, Brain Research Bulletin.

[34]  G. McCarthy,et al.  When Strangers Pass , 2004, Psychological science.

[35]  David C. Van Essen,et al.  A Population-Average, Landmark- and Surface-based (PALS) atlas of human cerebral cortex , 2005, NeuroImage.

[36]  L. Damjanovic,et al.  The eyes are sufficient to produce a threat superiority effect. , 2006, Emotion.

[37]  J. Decety,et al.  Brain Regions Involved in the Perception of Gaze: A PET Study , 1998, NeuroImage.

[38]  Doris Y. Tsao,et al.  Faces and objects in macaque cerebral cortex , 2003, Nature Neuroscience.

[39]  Karl J. Friston,et al.  Statistical parametric maps in functional imaging: A general linear approach , 1994 .

[40]  D. V. van Essen,et al.  A Population-Average, Landmark- and Surface-based (PALS) atlas of human cerebral cortex. , 2005, NeuroImage.

[41]  Daniel D. Dilks,et al.  Differential selectivity for dynamic versus static information in face-selective cortical regions , 2011, NeuroImage.

[42]  Peter Thier,et al.  Cortical processing of head- and eye-gaze cues guiding joint social attention , 2011, NeuroImage.

[43]  Andrew D. Engell,et al.  Facial expression and gaze-direction in human superior temporal sulcus , 2007, Neuropsychologia.

[44]  M. Tomasello,et al.  The emergence of social cognition in three young chimpanzees. , 2005, Monographs of the Society for Research in Child Development.

[45]  P. Downing,et al.  Human Neuroscience , 2022 .

[46]  C. Moore,et al.  Attention and joint attention in preschool children with autism. , 2000, Developmental psychology.