Burr-Hersey, Jasmine E. and Mooney, Sacha J. and Bengough, A. Glyn and Mairhofer, Stefan and Ritz, Karl (2017) Developmental morphology of cover crop species exhibit contrasting behaviour to changes in soil bulk

Plant roots growing through soil typically encounter considerable structural heterogeneity, and local variations in soil dry bulk density. The way the in situ architecture of root systems of different species respond to such heterogeneity is poorly understood due to challenges in visualising roots growing in soil. The objective of this study was to visualise and quantify the impact of abrupt changes in soil bulk density on the roots of three cover crop species with contrasting inherent root morphologies, viz. tillage radish (Raphanus sativus), vetch (Vicia sativa) and black oat (Avena strigosa). The species were grown in soil columns containing a two-layer compaction treatment featuring a 1.2 g cm (uncompacted) zone overlaying a 1.4 g cm (compacted) zone. Three-dimensional visualisations of the root architecture were generated via X-ray computed tomography, and an automated root-segmentation imaging algorithm. Three classes of behaviour were manifest as a result of roots encountering the compacted interface, directly related to the species. For radish, there was switch from a single tap-root to multiple perpendicular roots which penetrated the compacted zone, whilst for vetch primary roots were diverted more horizontally with limited lateral growth at less acute angles. Black oat roots penetrated the compacted zone with no apparent deviation. Smaller root volume, surface area and lateral growth were consistently observed in the compacted zone in comparison to the uncompacted zone across all species. The rapid transition in soil bulk density had a large effect on root morphology that differed greatly between species, with major implications for how these cover crops will modify and interact with soil structure.

[1]  I. Sinclair,et al.  Mapping soil deformation around plant roots using in vivo 4D X-ray Computed Tomography and Digital Volume Correlation. , 2016, Journal of biomechanics.

[2]  R. Horn,et al.  Root growth dynamics inside and outside of soil biopores as affected by crop sequence determined with the profile wall method , 2015, Biology and Fertility of Soils.

[3]  Stefan Mairhofer,et al.  On the evaluation of methods for the recovery of plant root systems from X-ray computed tomography images. , 2015, Functional plant biology : FPB.

[4]  Jianbo Shen,et al.  How do roots elongate in a structured soil? , 2013, Journal of experimental botany.

[5]  Lianhai Wu,et al.  Modelling root–soil interactions using three–dimensional models of root growth, architecture and function , 2013, Plant and Soil.

[6]  T. Hura,et al.  Changes in root system structure, leaf water potential and gas exchange of maize and triticale seedlings affected by soil compaction , 2013 .

[7]  Peter J. Gregory,et al.  Estimating root–soil contact from 3D X‐ray microtomographs , 2012 .

[8]  R. Villar,et al.  Linking root traits to plant physiology and growth in Fraxinus angustifolia Vahl. seedlings under soil compaction conditions , 2012 .

[9]  Cathy Hawes,et al.  Soil strength and macropore volume limit root elongation rates in many UK agricultural soils. , 2012, Annals of botany.

[10]  S. Mooney,et al.  Quantifying the effect of soil compaction on three varieties of wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) using X-ray Micro Computed Tomography (CT) , 2012, Plant and Soil.

[11]  S. Mooney,et al.  Developing X-ray Computed Tomography to non-invasively image 3-D root systems architecture in soil , 2012, Plant and Soil.

[12]  S. Mooney,et al.  RooTrak: Automated Recovery of Three-Dimensional Plant Root Architecture in Soil from X-Ray Microcomputed Tomography Images Using Visual Tracking1[W] , 2011, Plant Physiology.

[13]  L. J. Munkholm,et al.  Root growth conditions in the topsoil as affected by tillage intensity , 2011 .

[14]  Saoirse R Tracy,et al.  Soil compaction: a review of past and present techniques for investigating effects on root growth. , 2011, Journal of the science of food and agriculture.

[15]  R. MacCurdy,et al.  Three-Dimensional Root Phenotyping with a Novel Imaging and Software Platform1[C][W][OA] , 2011, Plant Physiology.

[16]  Jeffrey Lewis,et al.  Optimizing the experimental design of soil columns in saturated and unsaturated transport experiments. , 2010, Journal of contaminant hydrology.

[17]  R. Weil,et al.  Penetration of cover crop roots through compacted soils , 2010, Plant and Soil.

[18]  John A Kirkegaard,et al.  The distribution and abundance of wheat roots in a dense, structured subsoil--implications for water uptake. , 2010, Plant, cell & environment.

[19]  T. Batey,et al.  Soil compaction and soil management – a review , 2009 .

[20]  D. C. McKenzie,et al.  Soil compaction: identification directly in the field , 2006 .

[21]  J. Lipiec,et al.  Quantification of compaction effects on soil physical properties and crop growth , 2003 .

[22]  L. J. Clark,et al.  How do roots penetrate strong soil , 2003 .

[23]  R. Lal,et al.  Subsoil compaction effects on crops in Punjab, Pakistan: , 2001 .

[24]  L. Clark,et al.  Short communication. Do dicotyledons generate greater maximum axial root growth pressures than monocotyledons , 1999 .

[25]  J. K. Henshall,et al.  Soil structural quality, compaction and land management , 1997 .

[26]  J. B. Passioura,et al.  Soil structure and plant growth: Impact of bulk density and biopores , 1996, Plant and Soil.

[27]  François Tardieu,et al.  Growth and functioning of roots and of root systems subjected to soil compaction. Towards a system with multiple signalling , 1994 .

[28]  A. R. Dexter,et al.  Penetration of very strong soils by seedling roots of different plant species , 1991, Plant and Soil.

[29]  J. R. Pardales,et al.  Effects of soil compaction on the development of rice and maize root systems , 1991 .

[30]  H. M. Taylor,et al.  Effect of soil compaction on root development , 1991 .

[31]  A. G. Bengough,et al.  Mechanical impedance to root growth: a review of experimental techniques and root growth responses , 1990 .

[32]  M. Vepraskas.  Bulk Density Values Diagnostic of Restricted Root Growth in Coarse‐textured Soils , 1988 .

[33]  L. J. Munkholm,et al.  Tillage System and Cover Crop Effects on Soil Quality: II. Pore Characteristics , 2014 .

[34]  P. Hallett,et al.  Root elongation, water stress, and mechanical impedance: a review of limiting stresses and beneficial root tip traits. , 2011, Journal of experimental botany.

[35]  M. A. Hamzaa,et al.  Soil compaction in cropping systems A review of the nature , causes and possible solutions , 2005 .

[36]  L. J. Clark,et al.  How do roots penetrate strong soil? , 2004, Plant and Soil.

[37]  J. Lipiec,et al.  Effect of soil compaction on root growth and crop yield in Central and Eastern Europe , 2003 .

[38]  J. Kirkegaard,et al.  Subsoil amelioration by plant roots : the process and the evidence , 1995 .

[39]  B. J. Atwell,et al.  Response of roots to mechanical impedance , 1993 .

[40]  J. Passioura,et al.  Soil structure and plant growth , 1991 .