Massively parallel Bayesian inference for transient gravitational-wave astronomy
暂无分享,去创建一个
[1] J. Prochaska,et al. Spectropolarimetric Analysis of FRB 181112 at Microsecond Resolution: Implications for Fast Radio Burst Emission Mechanism , 2020, The Astrophysical Journal.
[2] M. Lower,et al. The UTMOST pulsar timing programme – II. Timing noise across the pulsar population , 2020, 2002.12481.
[3] D. Wei,et al. PSR J0030+0451, GW170817, and the Nuclear Data: Joint Constraints on Equation of State and Bulk Properties of Neutron Stars , 2019, The Astrophysical Journal.
[4] C. Broeck,et al. Science case for the Einstein telescope , 2019, Journal of Cosmology and Astroparticle Physics.
[5] F. Ohme,et al. Including higher order multipoles in gravitational-wave models for precessing binary black holes , 2019, Physical Review D.
[6] J. Speagle. dynesty: a dynamic nested sampling package for estimating Bayesian posteriors and evidences , 2019, Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society.
[7] E. Thrane,et al. Higher order gravitational-wave modes with likelihood reweighting , 2019, Physical Review D.
[8] E. Thrane,et al. Parallelized inference for gravitational-wave astronomy , 2019, Physical Review D.
[9] Lawrence E. Kidder,et al. On the properties of the massive binary black hole merger GW170729 , 2019, Physical Review D.
[10] Robert W. Taylor,et al. The US Program in Ground-Based Gravitational Wave Science: Contribution from the LIGO Laboratory , 2019, 1903.04615.
[11] B. C. Barish,et al. Summary of Tests of General Relativity with the Binary Black Hole Signals from the LIGO-Virgo Catalog GWTC-1 , 2019, 1905.05565.
[12] Brookhaven National Laboratory,et al. Accelerating parameter inference with graphics processing units , 2019, Physical Review D.
[13] Scott E. Field,et al. Surrogate model of hybridized numerical relativity binary black hole waveforms , 2018, Physical Review D.
[14] M. S. Shahriar,et al. Binary Black Hole Population Properties Inferred from the First and Second Observing Runs of Advanced LIGO and Advanced Virgo , 2018, The Astrophysical Journal.
[15] P. Lasky,et al. Bilby: A User-friendly Bayesian Inference Library for Gravitational-wave Astronomy , 2018, The Astrophysical Journal Supplement Series.
[16] J. K. Blackburn,et al. Tests of General Relativity with GW170817. , 2018, Physical review letters.
[17] Duncan A. Brown,et al. PyCBC Inference: A Python-based Parameter Estimation Toolkit for Compact Binary Coalescence Signals , 2018, Publications of the Astronomical Society of the Pacific.
[18] B. A. Boom,et al. Properties of the Binary Neutron Star Merger GW170817 , 2019 .
[19] C. Broeck,et al. Matter imprints in waveform models for neutron star binaries: Tidal and self-spin effects , 2018, Physical Review D.
[20] Kosuke Imai,et al. Survey Sampling , 1998, Nov/Dec 2017.
[21] D Huet,et al. GW170817: Measurements of Neutron Star Radii and Equation of State. , 2018, Physical review letters.
[22] Rory Smith,et al. Optimal Search for an Astrophysical Gravitational-Wave Background , 2017, 1712.00688.
[23] Duncan A. Brown,et al. Calibration uncertainty for Advanced LIGO’s first and second observing runs , 2017, 1708.03023.
[24] S. Bernuzzi,et al. Closed-form tidal approximants for binary neutron star gravitational waveforms constructed from high-resolution numerical relativity simulations , 2017, 1706.02969.
[25] Michael Boyle,et al. Numerical relativity waveform surrogate model for generically precessing binary black hole mergers , 2017, 1705.07089.
[26] Joseph D. Romano,et al. Detection methods for stochastic gravitational-wave backgrounds: a unified treatment , 2016, Living reviews in relativity.
[27] Y. Wang,et al. Exploring the sensitivity of next generation gravitational wave detectors , 2016, 1607.08697.
[28] Michael Purrer,et al. Fast and accurate inference on gravitational waves from precessing compact binaries , 2016, 1604.08253.
[29] Michael Pürrer,et al. Frequency domain reduced order model of aligned-spin effective-one-body waveforms with generic mass-ratios and spins , 2016 .
[30] D Huet,et al. Tests of General Relativity with GW150914. , 2016, Physical review letters.
[31] Michael Purrer,et al. Frequency-domain gravitational waves from nonprecessing black-hole binaries. II. A phenomenological model for the advanced detector era , 2015, 1508.07253.
[32] Michael Purrer,et al. Frequency-domain gravitational waves from nonprecessing black-hole binaries. I. New numerical waveforms and anatomy of the signal , 2015, 1508.07250.
[33] A. Lasenby,et al. polychord: next-generation nested sampling , 2015, 1506.00171.
[34] C. Pankow,et al. Novel scheme for rapid parallel parameter estimation of gravitational waves from compact binary coalescences , 2015, 1502.04370.
[35] P. Graff,et al. Parameter estimation for compact binaries with ground-based gravitational-wave observations using the LALInference software library , 2014, 1409.7215.
[36] Rory Smith,et al. Accelerated gravitational wave parameter estimation with reduced order modeling. , 2014, Physical review letters.
[37] Roy Williams,et al. The LIGO Open Science Center , 2014, 1410.4839.
[38] Neil J. Cornish,et al. Bayeswave: Bayesian inference for gravitational wave bursts and instrument glitches , 2014, 1410.3835.
[39] Michael Pürrer,et al. Frequency-domain reduced order models for gravitational waves from aligned-spin compact binaries , 2014 .
[40] Frank Ohme,et al. Twist and shout: A simple model of complete precessing black-hole-binary gravitational waveforms , 2013, 1308.3271.
[41] J. Dunkley,et al. Comparison of sampling techniques for Bayesian parameter estimation , 2013, 1308.2675.
[42] Yi Pan,et al. Inspiral-merger-ringdown waveforms of spinning, precessing black-hole binaries in the effective-one-body formalism , 2013, 1307.6232.
[43] Jan S. Hesthaven,et al. Fast prediction and evaluation of gravitational waveforms using surrogate models , 2013, ArXiv.
[44] S. Bose,et al. Scientific objectives of Einstein Telescope , 2012, 1206.0331.
[45] Bernard F. Schutz,et al. Low-frequency gravitational-wave science with eLISA/NGO , 2012, 1202.0839.
[46] Lisandro Dalcin,et al. Parallel distributed computing using Python , 2011 .
[47] A. Vecchio,et al. Bayesian coherent analysis of in-spiral gravitational wave signals with a detector network , 2009, 0911.3820.
[48] C. Robert,et al. Properties of nested sampling , 2008, 0801.3887.
[49] F. Feroz,et al. MultiNest: an efficient and robust Bayesian inference tool for cosmology and particle physics , 2008, 0809.3437.
[50] J. Skilling. Nested sampling for general Bayesian computation , 2006 .
[51] N. Christensen,et al. Using Markov chain Monte Carlo methods for estimating parameters with gravitational radiation data , 2001, gr-qc/0102018.
[52] C. Cutler. Angular resolution of the LISA gravitational wave detector , 1997, gr-qc/9703068.
[53] Flanagan,et al. Gravitational waves from merging compact binaries: How accurately can one extract the binary's parameters from the inspiral waveform? , 1994, Physical review. D, Particles and fields.
[54] Finn,et al. Observing binary inspiral in gravitational radiation: One interferometer. , 1993, Physical review. D, Particles and fields.
[55] W. K. Hastings,et al. Monte Carlo Sampling Methods Using Markov Chains and Their Applications , 1970 .
[56] N. Metropolis,et al. Equation of State Calculations by Fast Computing Machines , 1953, Resonance.
[57] T. Bayes. LII. An essay towards solving a problem in the doctrine of chances. By the late Rev. Mr. Bayes, F. R. S. communicated by Mr. Price, in a letter to John Canton, A. M. F. R. S , 1763, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London.