Massively parallel Bayesian inference for transient gravitational-wave astronomy

Understanding the properties of transient gravitational waves (GWs) and their sources is of broad interest in physics and astronomy. Bayesian inference is the standard framework for astrophysical measurement in transient GW astronomy. Usually, stochastic sampling algorithms are used to estimate posterior probability distributions over the parameter spaces of models describing experimental data. The most physically accurate models typically come with a large computational overhead which can render data analsis extremely time consuming, or possibly even prohibitive. In some cases highly specialized optimizations can mitigate these issues, though they can be difficult to implement, as well as to generalize to arbitrary models of the data. Here, we investigate an accurate, flexible, and scalable method for astrophysical inference: parallelized nested sampling. The reduction in the wall-time of inference scales almost linearly with the number of parallel processes running on a high-performance computing cluster. By utilizing a pool of several hundreds or thousands of CPUs in a high-performance cluster, the large wall times of many astrophysical inferences can be alleviated while simultaneously ensuring that any GW signal model can be used ‘out of the box’, i.e. without additional optimization or approximation. Our method will be useful to both the LIGO-Virgo-KAGRA collaborations and the wider scientific community performing astrophysical analyses on GWs. An implementation is available in the open source gravitational-wave inference library pBilby (parallel bilby).

[1]  J. Prochaska,et al.  Spectropolarimetric Analysis of FRB 181112 at Microsecond Resolution: Implications for Fast Radio Burst Emission Mechanism , 2020, The Astrophysical Journal.

[2]  M. Lower,et al.  The UTMOST pulsar timing programme – II. Timing noise across the pulsar population , 2020, 2002.12481.

[3]  D. Wei,et al.  PSR J0030+0451, GW170817, and the Nuclear Data: Joint Constraints on Equation of State and Bulk Properties of Neutron Stars , 2019, The Astrophysical Journal.

[4]  C. Broeck,et al.  Science case for the Einstein telescope , 2019, Journal of Cosmology and Astroparticle Physics.

[5]  F. Ohme,et al.  Including higher order multipoles in gravitational-wave models for precessing binary black holes , 2019, Physical Review D.

[6]  J. Speagle dynesty: a dynamic nested sampling package for estimating Bayesian posteriors and evidences , 2019, Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society.

[7]  E. Thrane,et al.  Higher order gravitational-wave modes with likelihood reweighting , 2019, Physical Review D.

[8]  E. Thrane,et al.  Parallelized inference for gravitational-wave astronomy , 2019, Physical Review D.

[9]  Lawrence E. Kidder,et al.  On the properties of the massive binary black hole merger GW170729 , 2019, Physical Review D.

[10]  Robert W. Taylor,et al.  The US Program in Ground-Based Gravitational Wave Science: Contribution from the LIGO Laboratory , 2019, 1903.04615.

[11]  B. C. Barish,et al.  Summary of Tests of General Relativity with the Binary Black Hole Signals from the LIGO-Virgo Catalog GWTC-1 , 2019, 1905.05565.

[12]  Brookhaven National Laboratory,et al.  Accelerating parameter inference with graphics processing units , 2019, Physical Review D.

[13]  Scott E. Field,et al.  Surrogate model of hybridized numerical relativity binary black hole waveforms , 2018, Physical Review D.

[14]  M. S. Shahriar,et al.  Binary Black Hole Population Properties Inferred from the First and Second Observing Runs of Advanced LIGO and Advanced Virgo , 2018, The Astrophysical Journal.

[15]  P. Lasky,et al.  Bilby: A User-friendly Bayesian Inference Library for Gravitational-wave Astronomy , 2018, The Astrophysical Journal Supplement Series.

[16]  J. K. Blackburn,et al.  Tests of General Relativity with GW170817. , 2018, Physical review letters.

[17]  Duncan A. Brown,et al.  PyCBC Inference: A Python-based Parameter Estimation Toolkit for Compact Binary Coalescence Signals , 2018, Publications of the Astronomical Society of the Pacific.

[18]  B. A. Boom,et al.  Properties of the Binary Neutron Star Merger GW170817 , 2019 .

[19]  C. Broeck,et al.  Matter imprints in waveform models for neutron star binaries: Tidal and self-spin effects , 2018, Physical Review D.

[20]  Kosuke Imai,et al.  Survey Sampling , 1998, Nov/Dec 2017.

[21]  D Huet,et al.  GW170817: Measurements of Neutron Star Radii and Equation of State. , 2018, Physical review letters.

[22]  Rory Smith,et al.  Optimal Search for an Astrophysical Gravitational-Wave Background , 2017, 1712.00688.

[23]  Duncan A. Brown,et al.  Calibration uncertainty for Advanced LIGO’s first and second observing runs , 2017, 1708.03023.

[24]  S. Bernuzzi,et al.  Closed-form tidal approximants for binary neutron star gravitational waveforms constructed from high-resolution numerical relativity simulations , 2017, 1706.02969.

[25]  Michael Boyle,et al.  Numerical relativity waveform surrogate model for generically precessing binary black hole mergers , 2017, 1705.07089.

[26]  Joseph D. Romano,et al.  Detection methods for stochastic gravitational-wave backgrounds: a unified treatment , 2016, Living reviews in relativity.

[27]  Y. Wang,et al.  Exploring the sensitivity of next generation gravitational wave detectors , 2016, 1607.08697.

[28]  Michael Purrer,et al.  Fast and accurate inference on gravitational waves from precessing compact binaries , 2016, 1604.08253.

[29]  Michael Pürrer,et al.  Frequency domain reduced order model of aligned-spin effective-one-body waveforms with generic mass-ratios and spins , 2016 .

[30]  D Huet,et al.  Tests of General Relativity with GW150914. , 2016, Physical review letters.

[31]  Michael Purrer,et al.  Frequency-domain gravitational waves from nonprecessing black-hole binaries. II. A phenomenological model for the advanced detector era , 2015, 1508.07253.

[32]  Michael Purrer,et al.  Frequency-domain gravitational waves from nonprecessing black-hole binaries. I. New numerical waveforms and anatomy of the signal , 2015, 1508.07250.

[33]  A. Lasenby,et al.  polychord: next-generation nested sampling , 2015, 1506.00171.

[34]  C. Pankow,et al.  Novel scheme for rapid parallel parameter estimation of gravitational waves from compact binary coalescences , 2015, 1502.04370.

[35]  P. Graff,et al.  Parameter estimation for compact binaries with ground-based gravitational-wave observations using the LALInference software library , 2014, 1409.7215.

[36]  Rory Smith,et al.  Accelerated gravitational wave parameter estimation with reduced order modeling. , 2014, Physical review letters.

[37]  Roy Williams,et al.  The LIGO Open Science Center , 2014, 1410.4839.

[38]  Neil J. Cornish,et al.  Bayeswave: Bayesian inference for gravitational wave bursts and instrument glitches , 2014, 1410.3835.

[39]  Michael Pürrer,et al.  Frequency-domain reduced order models for gravitational waves from aligned-spin compact binaries , 2014 .

[40]  Frank Ohme,et al.  Twist and shout: A simple model of complete precessing black-hole-binary gravitational waveforms , 2013, 1308.3271.

[41]  J. Dunkley,et al.  Comparison of sampling techniques for Bayesian parameter estimation , 2013, 1308.2675.

[42]  Yi Pan,et al.  Inspiral-merger-ringdown waveforms of spinning, precessing black-hole binaries in the effective-one-body formalism , 2013, 1307.6232.

[43]  Jan S. Hesthaven,et al.  Fast prediction and evaluation of gravitational waveforms using surrogate models , 2013, ArXiv.

[44]  S. Bose,et al.  Scientific objectives of Einstein Telescope , 2012, 1206.0331.

[45]  Bernard F. Schutz,et al.  Low-frequency gravitational-wave science with eLISA/NGO , 2012, 1202.0839.

[46]  Lisandro Dalcin,et al.  Parallel distributed computing using Python , 2011 .

[47]  A. Vecchio,et al.  Bayesian coherent analysis of in-spiral gravitational wave signals with a detector network , 2009, 0911.3820.

[48]  C. Robert,et al.  Properties of nested sampling , 2008, 0801.3887.

[49]  F. Feroz,et al.  MultiNest: an efficient and robust Bayesian inference tool for cosmology and particle physics , 2008, 0809.3437.

[50]  J. Skilling Nested sampling for general Bayesian computation , 2006 .

[51]  N. Christensen,et al.  Using Markov chain Monte Carlo methods for estimating parameters with gravitational radiation data , 2001, gr-qc/0102018.

[52]  C. Cutler Angular resolution of the LISA gravitational wave detector , 1997, gr-qc/9703068.

[53]  Flanagan,et al.  Gravitational waves from merging compact binaries: How accurately can one extract the binary's parameters from the inspiral waveform? , 1994, Physical review. D, Particles and fields.

[54]  Finn,et al.  Observing binary inspiral in gravitational radiation: One interferometer. , 1993, Physical review. D, Particles and fields.

[55]  W. K. Hastings,et al.  Monte Carlo Sampling Methods Using Markov Chains and Their Applications , 1970 .

[56]  N. Metropolis,et al.  Equation of State Calculations by Fast Computing Machines , 1953, Resonance.

[57]  T. Bayes LII. An essay towards solving a problem in the doctrine of chances. By the late Rev. Mr. Bayes, F. R. S. communicated by Mr. Price, in a letter to John Canton, A. M. F. R. S , 1763, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London.