Drivers and barriers to public acceptance of future energy sources and grid expansion in the United States

Abstract With the coming of the 21st century in the U.S., reliance on fossil fuels, in particular coal, decreased while renewable energy sources increased their contribution to the U.S. energy portfolio. The factors behind this emerging trend toward a decreased reliance on coal are many, including economic as well as policy goals. Nationally, support is strong for the general transition to renewable energy, but this support can decline at the local level particularly if renewable energy is perceived as have negative local economic impact, impeding implementation. However, some look at this as part of a transition to a new economic power structure. Due to a lack of research on identifying public preferences for energy production in the United States, the authors conducted a national survey to identify drivers and barriers of acceptance of different types of electrical energy production. Results show that nationally, most Americans support decarbonization of the energy sector, especially if wind and solar photovoltaic facilities are located at least 5 miles (8 km) from their home. This is also supported by strong preference for an energy mix containing a larger percentage of energy produced by renewable energy sources. Environmental sustainability, economic viability, and social acceptance were of roughly equal importance in pairwise comparison of policy objectives. Results also demonstrate the importance of analyzing socio-demographic characteristic's role regarding acceptance of renewable energy sources. The information is useful for policy makers to better implement renewable energy development and improve acceptance of such technologies at the local level.

[1]  Ortwin Renn,et al.  Perception of risks. , 2004, Toxicology letters.

[2]  Armin Steinbach,et al.  Barriers and solutions for expansion of electricity grids—the German experience , 2013 .

[3]  Martin J. Pasqualetti,et al.  Social Barriers to Renewable Energy Landscapes* , 2011 .

[4]  Michael Siegrist,et al.  Public acceptance of the expansion and modification of high-voltage power lines in the context of the energy transition , 2015 .

[5]  M. Siegrist,et al.  Perception of Hazards: The Role of Social Trust and Knowledge , 2000, Risk analysis : an official publication of the Society for Risk Analysis.

[6]  Jeffrey Jacquet,et al.  Beauty in motion: Expectations, attitudes, and values of wind energy development in the rural U.S , 2016 .

[7]  Valentin Bertsch,et al.  What drives people's opinions of electricity infrastructure? Empirical evidence from Ireland , 2017 .

[8]  A. Jobert,et al.  Local acceptance of wind energy: Factors of success identified in French and German case studies , 2007 .

[9]  David M. Konisky,et al.  Stakeholder Perceptions of the United States Energy Transition: Local-Level Dynamics and Community Responses to National Politics and Policy , 2018, Energy Research & Social Science.

[10]  J. Cohen,et al.  Re-focussing research efforts on the public acceptance of energy infrastructure: A critical review , 2014 .

[11]  T. Saaty,et al.  The Analytic Hierarchy Process , 1985 .

[12]  M. Galesic,et al.  Effects of Questionnaire Length on Participation and Indicators of Response Quality in a Web Survey , 2009 .

[13]  O. Kuik,et al.  Local acceptance of renewable energy - A case study from southeast Germany , 2011 .

[14]  P. Devine‐Wright,et al.  Partnership or placation? The role of trust and justice in the shared ownership of renewable energy projects , 2016 .

[15]  S. Sills,et al.  Innovations in Survey Research , 2002 .

[16]  Jinkyun Cho,et al.  Energy-cost analysis of HVAC system for office buildings: Development of a multiple prediction methodology for HVAC system cost estimation , 2018, Energy and Buildings.

[17]  M Granger Morgan,et al.  Informed Public Preferences for Electricity Portfolios with CCS and Other Low‐Carbon Technologies , 2010, Risk analysis : an official publication of the Society for Risk Analysis.

[18]  G. Assefa,et al.  Social sustainability and social acceptance in technology assessment: A case study of energy technologies , 2007 .

[19]  Eefje Cuppen,et al.  The role of dialogue in fostering acceptance of transmission lines: the case of a France–Spain interconnection project , 2013 .

[20]  Maarten Wolsink,et al.  Wind power implementation: The nature of public attitudes: Equity and fairness instead of ‘backyard motives’ , 2007 .

[21]  M. Peterson,et al.  Citizen preferences for possible energy policies at the national and state levels , 2018, Energy Policy.

[22]  Michael Siegrist,et al.  Public acceptance of high-voltage power lines: The influence of information provision on undergrounding , 2018 .

[23]  P. Esaiasson NIMBYism - a re-examination of the phenomenon. , 2014, Social science research.

[24]  W. Konrad,et al.  The good, the bad, and the ambivalent: A qualitative study of public perceptions towards energy technologies and portfolios in Germany , 2017 .

[25]  Petra Schweizer-Ries,et al.  Public acceptance of renewable energies: Results from case studies in Germany , 2008 .

[26]  Patrick Devine-Wright,et al.  My neighbourhood, my country or my planet? The influence of multiple place attachments and climate change concern on social acceptance of energy infrastructure , 2017 .

[27]  E. Williams,et al.  Analyzing consumer acceptance of photovoltaics (PV) using fuzzy logic model , 2012 .

[28]  Matthew J. Burke,et al.  Political power and renewable energy futures: A critical review , 2017 .

[29]  W. Fichtner,et al.  Public acceptance and preferences related to renewable energy and grid expansion policy: Empirical insights for Germany , 2016 .

[30]  P. Devine‐Wright Reconsidering public attitudes and public acceptance of renewable energy technologies: a critical review , 2007 .

[31]  P. Devine‐Wright,et al.  Explaining public preferences for high voltage pylon designs: An empirical study of perceived fit in a rural landscape , 2013 .

[32]  Maarten Wolsink,et al.  Wind power and the NIMBY-myth: institutional capacity and the limited significance of public support , 2000 .

[33]  Shawn K. Olson-Hazboun “Why are we being punished and they are being rewarded?” views on renewable energy in fossil fuels-based communities of the U.S. west , 2018, The Extractive Industries and Society.

[34]  Johannes Reichl,et al.  Realizing energy infrastructure projects – A qualitative empirical analysis of local practices to address social acceptance , 2016 .

[35]  Gonçalo Duarte Garcia Pereira,et al.  Integrating social power into the decision-making of cognitive agents , 2016, Artif. Intell..

[36]  Trieu Mai,et al.  Electrification & Decarbonization : Exploring U . S . Energy Use and Greenhouse Gas Emissions in Scenarios with Widespread Electrification and Power Sector Decarbonization , 2017 .

[37]  D. Horst NIMBY or not? Exploring the relevance of location and the politics of voiced opinions in renewable energy siting controversies , 2007 .

[38]  Rolf Wüstenhagen,et al.  Social acceptance of renewable energy innovation: An introduction to the concept , 2007 .