Leveraging electronic collaboration to promote interorganizational learning

Abstract By combining research on interorganizational learning (IOL) with that on IT-enabled collaboration, this study examines the role of electronic collaboration (e-collaboration) enabled through the use of interorganizational information systems in the development of a firm's capabilities such as IOL. Moreover, this study examines IOL as a capability posited between electronic collaboration and firm performance. Finally, we conceptualize IOL as a multidimensional construct composed of information sharing, relationship-specific knowledge memory, and the development of shared meaning and verify the relationships between them. The study provides an empirical analysis of the proposed model and hypotheses by considering data from various industries. The results indicate that e-collaboration was positively related to all three components of IOL. In terms of the relationships between these components, information sharing had a positive effect on relationship-specific knowledge memory, which in turn facilitated the development of shared meaning. Only the development of shared meaning had a significant effect on firm performance. Discussions and implications of the results are provided.

[1]  Sunder Kekre,et al.  Strategic and Operational Benefits of Electronic Integration in B2B Procurement Processes , 2002, Manag. Sci..

[2]  F. Selnes,et al.  Promoting Relationship Learning , 2003 .

[3]  Nilesh Saraf,et al.  IS Application Capabilities and Relational Value in Interfirm Partnerships , 2007, Inf. Syst. Res..

[4]  Eric T. G. Wang,et al.  A Virtual Integration Theory of Improved Supply-Chain Performance , 2006, J. Manag. Inf. Syst..

[5]  Phillip L. Carter,et al.  SUPPLIER INNOVATIVENESS AND THE ROLE OF INTERORGANIZATIONAL LEARNING IN ENHANCING MANUFACTURER CAPABILITIES , 2008 .

[6]  Anne S. Miner,et al.  The Impact of Organizational Memory on New Product Performance and Creativity , 1997 .

[7]  Varun Grover,et al.  Types of Information Technology Capabilities and Their Role in Competitive Advantage: An Empirical Study , 2005, J. Manag. Inf. Syst..

[8]  Lorne Olfman,et al.  Organizational Memory , 1998, Proceedings of the Thirty-First Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences.

[9]  W. Powell,et al.  Interorganizational Collaboration and the Locus of Innovation: Networks of Learning in Biotechnology. , 1996 .

[10]  L. Bengtsson,et al.  The Interorganizational Learning Dilemma: Collective Knowledge Development in Strategic Alliances , 1998 .

[11]  Lorne Olfman,et al.  The Impacts of Electronic Collaboration and Information Exploitation Capability on Firm Performance: Focusing on Suppliers using Buyer-Dominated Interorganizational Information Systems1 , 2009, Int. J. e Collab..

[12]  Louise Knight,et al.  Network Learning: Exploring Learning by Interorganizational Networks , 2002 .

[13]  Shih-Chieh Fang,et al.  Relationship learning and innovation: The role of relationship-specific memory , 2011 .

[14]  Rajdeep Grewal,et al.  The Role of Relational Knowledge Stores in Interfirm Partnering , 2004 .

[15]  Ravipreet S. Sohi,et al.  The development of interfirm partnering competence: Platforms for learning, learning activities, and consequences of learning , 2003 .

[16]  R. Sohi,et al.  IT competency and firm performance: is organizational learning a missing link? , 2003 .

[17]  Scott B. MacKenzie,et al.  Common method biases in behavioral research: a critical review of the literature and recommended remedies. , 2003, The Journal of applied psychology.

[18]  William L. Fuerst,et al.  Information technology and sustained competitive advantage: a resource-based analysis , 1995 .

[19]  Li Ling-yee,et al.  Relationship learning at trade shows : its antecedents and consequences , 2006 .

[20]  Rebecca Angeles,et al.  Anticipated IT infrastructure and supply chain integration capabilities for RFID and their associated deployment outcomes , 2008, Int. J. Inf. Manag..

[21]  M. Wade,et al.  Review: the resource-based view and information systems research: review, extension, and suggestions for future research , 2004 .

[22]  Jeffrey H. Dyer,et al.  The Relational View: Cooperative Strategy and Sources of Interorganizational Competitive Advantage , 1998 .

[23]  Daniel A. Levinthal,et al.  Exploration and Exploitation in Organizational Learning , 2007 .

[24]  Massimo Magni,et al.  IT knowledge integration capability and team performance: The role of team climate , 2010, Int. J. Inf. Manag..

[25]  Xiaotong Li,et al.  International Journal of Information Management the Role of the Quality of Shared Information in Interorganizational Systems Use , 2022 .

[26]  Jen-Her Wu,et al.  IT management capability and its impact on the performance of a CIO , 2011, Inf. Manag..

[27]  Bruce R. Barringer,et al.  Walking a Tightrope: Creating Value Through Interorganizational Relationships , 2000 .

[28]  M. Bensaou,et al.  Interorganizational Cooperation: The Role of Information Technology an Empirical Comparison of U.S. and Japanese Supplier Relations , 1997, Inf. Syst. Res..

[29]  I. Nonaka.  A Dynamic Theory of Organizational Knowledge Creation , 1994 .

[30]  Anandhi S. Bharadwaj,et al.  A Resource-Based Perspective on Information Technology Capability and Firm Performance: An Empirical Investigation , 2000, MIS Q..

[31]  James M. Sinkula.  Market Information Processing and Organizational Learning , 1994 .

[32]  Arun Rai,et al.  Firm performance impacts of digitally enabled supply chain integration capabilities , 2006 .

[33]  Markku V. J. Maula,et al.  Explorative and Exploitative Learning from External Corporate Ventures , 2005 .

[34]  A. Zaheer,et al.  Determinants of Electronic Integration in the Insurance Industry: An Empirical Test , 1994 .

[35]  Arun Rai,et al.  Relational Antecedents of Information Flow Integration for Supply Chain Coordination , 2006, J. Manag. Inf. Syst..

[36]  J. Barney.  Firm Resources and Sustained Competitive Advantage , 1991 .

[37]  Jao-Hong Cheng,et al.  Inter-organizational relationships and information sharing in supply chains , 2011, Int. J. Inf. Manag..

[38]  Izak Benbasat,et al.  Predicting Intention to Adopt Interorganizational Linkages: An Institutional Perspective , 2003, MIS Q..

[39]  Ángel L. Meroño-Cerdán,et al.  Information technology and learning: Their relationship and impact on organisational performance in small businesses , 2006, Int. J. Inf. Manag..

[40]  Kenneth L. Kraemer,et al.  Review: Information Technology and Organizational Performance: An Integrative Model of IT Business Value , 2004, MIS Q..

[41]  O. Ferrell,et al.  A theoretical perspective of the antecedents and consequences of organizational learning in marketing channels , 1996 .

[42]  Carol Stoak Saunders,et al.  Emerging Electronic Partnerships: Antecedents and Dimensions of EDI Use from the Supplier's Perspective , 1998, J. Manag. Inf. Syst..

[43]  T. C. Powell,et al.  Information technology as competitive advantage: the role of human , 1997 .

[44]  Ellen Christiaanse,et al.  Beyond Sabre: An Empirical Test of Expertise Exploitation in Electronic Channels , 2002, MIS Q..

[45]  J. H. Dyer,et al.  Creating and managing a high‐performance knowledge‐sharing network: the Toyota case , 2000 .

[46]  Omar El Sawy,et al.  Leveraging Standard Electronic Business Interfaces to Enable Adaptive Supply Chain Partnerships , 2007, Inf. Syst. Res..

[47]  G. Huber.  Organizational Learning: The Contributing Processes and the Literatures , 1991 .

[48]  Peter J. Lane,et al.  Relative absorptive capacity and interorganizational learning , 1998 .

[49]  Mani Subramani,et al.  How Do Suppliers Benefit from Information Technology Use in Supply Chain Relationships? , 2004, MIS Q..

[50]  Ali F. Farhoomand,et al.  A structural model of end user computing satisfaction and user performance , 1996, Inf. Manag..

[51]  Jan B. Heide,et al.  ALLIANCES IN INDUSTRIAL PURCHASING - THE DETERMINANTS OF JOINT ACTION IN BUYER-SUPPLIER RELATIONSHIPS , 1990 .

[52]  Anne S. Miner,et al.  The Impact of Organizational Memory on New Product Performance and Creativity , 1997 .

[53]  Judy E. Scott.  Facilitating Interorganizational Learning with Information Technology , 2000, J. Manag. Inf. Syst..

[54]  Terry S. Overton,et al.  Estimating Nonresponse Bias in Mail Surveys , 1977 .

[55]  C. Fornell,et al.  Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error. , 1981 .

[56]  J. March.  Exploration and exploitation in organizational learning , 1991, STUDI ORGANIZZATIVI.

[57]  Jeffrey H. Dyer,et al.  The Role of Trustworthiness in Reducing Transaction Costs and Improving Performance: Empirical Evidence from the United States, Japan, and Korea , 2003 .

[58]  Daniel A. Levinthal,et al.  ABSORPTIVE CAPACITY: A NEW PERSPECTIVE ON LEARNING AND INNOVATION , 1990 .

[59]  Mikael Holmqvist.  A Dynamic Model of Intra-and Interorganizational Learning , 2003 .

[60]  Omar El Sawy,et al.  Absorptive Capacity Configurations in Supply Chains: Gearing for Partner-Enabled Market Knowledge Creation , 2005, MIS Q..

[61]  D. Ketchen,et al.  Information Processing, Knowledge Development, and Strategic Supply Chain Performance , 2004 .

[62]  J. Scott Armstrong,et al.  Estimating nonresponse bias in mail surveys. , 1977 .

[63]  John C. Narver,et al.  Market Orientation and the Learning Organization , 1995 .

[64]  Sean Hammond,et al.  Research Methods in Psychology , 1994 .

[65]  Harbir Singh,et al.  Learning and protection of proprietary assets in strategic alliances: building relational capital , 2000 .

[66]  Paul Israel,et al.  The Sources of Innovation , 1990 .