Different environmental conditions, different results: the role of controlled environmental stress on grape quality potential and the way to monitor it

Environmental stress, such as water deficit or limited nitrogen availability, reduces grape yield, but generally promotes grape quality potential for red table wine production. Limited nitrogen uptake limits grape yield but enhances grape quality potential for red table wine production, because it reduces berry size and enhances phenolic compound synthesis. Water deficit stress has one negative effect (reduction of photosynthesis), and many positive effects (shoot growth cessation, reduction of berry size and stimulation of phenolic compound synthesis). Mild water deficit stress increases berry quality potential, despite reduced photosynthesis. This can be explained not only by a reduced competition for sugars between shoot growth and fruit ripening, but also by reduced berry size. For red Bordeaux wine, vintage quality is well correlated to the drought of the vintage. Many tools are available for monitoring vine water status. Among them, two are of particular interest: stem water potential and carbon isotope discrimination measured on grape sugars (13C/12C ratio or δ13C). Stem water potential is better related to vine transpiration than leaf water potential. Stem water potential is a more precise indicator of vine water status than pre-dawn leaf water potential in soils with heterogeneous humidity, which is the case in irrigated soils. 13C/12C ratio in grape sugar (δ13C) is related to vine water status during grape ripening and can be measured with mass spectrometry. This indicator can be implemented to assess the severity of vine water deficit stress in dry farmed vineyards without any measurement in the field. For companies buying grapes from deficit irrigated vineyards it can be used to control the irrigation management on a mere sample of grape juice. Grape production can be made economically viable through high yields, high quality allowing high selling prices or low production costs. Strategic winery management implies deciding which of these parameters should be optimised. High yields can be obtained by fertirrigation of vines planted in fertile sites. High quality red table wine allowing high selling prices are produced by vines grown under environmental stress. Moreover, specific terroir expression is related to environmental stress. Production costs can be reduced by mechanisation and low labour input vineyard design. Introduction The vine is a resistant species to environmental stress. Historically, in the Old World, fertile land was preferentially used for grazing and annual crops. Shallow soils, stony soils and steep slopes were used for vineyards or olive tree plantations (van Leeuwen and Seguin 2006). Although yields tend to be moderate to low in these conditions, grape quality potential for wine making is generally high. Traditionally, vine vigour, yield and grape quality potential were controlled through site selection. By trial and error the best locations for quality production were selected. Today, vineyards are planted in a broader range of environmental conditions. The effects of environmental stress on yield and quality parameters are better understood and they can be more easily managed. Soil fertility depends mainly on water and nitrogen availability, generally in relation to soil depth (the deeper the soil, the more fertile it is; Coipel et al. 2006). A limitation in nitrogen uptake reduces vine vigour, berry weight and yield and increases berry sugar, anthocyanin and tannin content (Kliewer 1971, Choné et al. 2001a, Hilbert et al. 2003). Vine nitrogen status can be monitored through petiole, leaf blade or must analysis (Kliewer 1991, van Leeuwen et al. 2000a). Must total nitrogen or must yeast available nitrogen are practical and accurate indicators. Vine nitrogen uptake can be reduced through cover crop (Soyer et al. 1996) and increased through fertilisation. A limitation in water uptake also reduces vine vigour, berry weight and yield and increases berry anthocyanin and tanin content (Hardie and Considine 1976, Matthews and Anderson 1988,1989, van Leeuwen and Seguin 1994, Koundouras et al. 2006). The effect on berry sugar content is yield-dependant; in low yields, vine water deficit enhances berry sugar content and in high yields it depresses berry sugar content (Tregoat et al. 2002). Vine water status can be assessed through (i) soil water monitoring, by means of neutron moisture probes (Seguin 1986) or Time Domaine Reflectometry (Koundouras et al. 1999), (ii) water balance modelling (Lebon et al. 2003), or (iii) the use of physiological indicators (van Leeuwen et al. 2001a, Cifre et al. 2005). Among physiological indicators two are of particular interest: stem water potential (Choné et al. 2001b) and the 13C/12C ratio measured on grape sugar at ripeness (δ13C or carbon isotope discrimination, van Leeuwen et al. 2001b, Gaudillère et al. 2002). Vine water deficit can be increased by withholding irrigation water and increasing leaf area on a per hectare basis. Vine water deficit can be reduced by selecting drought resistant rootstocks (110Richter), by limiting leaf area, by limiting crop, by selecting drought resistant varieties (Grenache, Carignane) and by irrigation. Grape production can be made economically viable through i) high yields ii) high quality allowing high selling prices iii) low production costs. To obtain high yields, vines should be planted in fertile soils and irrigated if rainfall is limited during the growing season. High quality for red table wine production is obtained if vines are grown under environmental stress (van Leeuwen et al. 2004). When environmental stress is moderate, high quality can be combined with reasonably high yields. When environmental stress is severe, a low yield is necessary to obtain high quality. Low production costs can be obtained either by mechanisation or by low labour input vineyard design, such as unirrigated bush vines. In such vineyards, production cost per ton of grapes is low, even in low yields.

[1]  Eric Lebon,et al.  Branch development controls leaf area dynamics in grapevine (Vitis vinifera) growing in drying soil. , 2006, Annals of botany.

[2]  C. van Leeuwen,et al.  The concept of terroir in viticulture , 2006 .

[3]  Hamlyn G. Jones,et al.  Use of infrared thermometry for estimation of stomatal conductance as a possible aid to irrigation scheduling , 1999 .

[4]  J. Flexas,et al.  Physiological tools for irrigation scheduling in grapevine (Vitis vinifera L.): An open gate to improve water-use efficiency? , 2005 .

[5]  H. Schultz,et al.  Resistance to Water Transport in Shoots of Vitis vinifera L. : Relation to Growth at Low Water Potential. , 1988, Plant physiology.

[6]  J. Ehleringer,et al.  Carbon Isotope Discrimination and Photosynthesis , 1989 .

[7]  W. Kliewer Methods for determining the nitrogen status of vineyards , 1991 .

[8]  D. Dubourdieu,et al.  Effect of vine nitrogen status on grape aromatic potential: flavor precursors (S-cysteine conjugates), glutathione and phenolic content in Vitis vinifera L. Cv Sauvignon blanc grape juice , 2006 .

[9]  J. A. Considine,et al.  Response of Grapes to Water-Deficit Stress in Particular Stages of Development , 1976, American Journal of Enology and Viticulture.

[10]  Xavier Choné,et al.  L' intérêt du dosage de l' azote total et de l' azote assimilable dans le moût comme indicateur de la nutrition azotée de la vigne , 2000 .

[11]  J. R. Morris,et al.  Effects of Excessive Potassium Levels On pH, Acidity and Color of Fresh and Stored Grape Juice , 1983, American Journal of Enology and Viticulture.

[12]  Vincent Dumas,et al.  Modelling the seasonal dynamics of the soil water balance of vineyards. , 2003, Functional plant biology : FPB.

[13]  P. F. Scholander,et al.  Sap Pressure in Vascular Plants , 1965, Science.

[14]  Sylvia Dayau,et al.  Significance and limits in the use of predawn leaf water potential for tree irrigation , 1999, Plant and Soil.

[15]  W. Kliewer,et al.  Effects on Must and Wine Composition, Rates of Fermentation, and Wine Quality of Nitrogen Fertilization ofVitis ViniferaVar. Thompson Seedless Grapevines , 1979, American Journal of Enology and Viticulture.

[16]  Cornelis van Leeuwen,et al.  "Terroir" effect, as a result of enviromental stess, depends more on soil depth than on soil type ( Vitis vinifera L. cv. Grenache Noir, Côtes du Rhône, France, 2000) , 2006 .

[17]  G. Seguin,et al.  Incidence de l'alimentation en eau de la vigne, appreciee par l'etat hydrique du feuillage, sur le developpement de l'appareil vegetatif et la maturation du raisin ( Vitis vinifera variété Cabernet franc, Saint-Emilion 1990) , 1994 .

[18]  M. Matthews,et al.  Developmental changes in the diurnal water budget of the grape berry exposed to water deficits , 1994 .

[19]  Mark A. Matthews,et al.  Fruit Ripening inVitis viniferaL.: Responses to Seasonal Water Deficits , 1988, American Journal of Enology and Viticulture.

[20]  D. Dubourdieu,et al.  Influence of water and nitrogen deficit on fruit ripening and aroma potential of Vitis vinifera L cv Sauvignon blanc in field conditions , 2005 .

[21]  Stefanos Koundouras,et al.  Influence de l' alimentation en eau sur la croissance de la vigne, la maturation des raisins et les caracteristiques des vins en zone mediterraneenne (exemple de Nemee, Grece, cepage Saint-Georges, 1997). , 1999 .

[22]  Eric Lebon,et al.  Towards a simple indicator of water stress in grapevine (Vitis vinifera L.) based on the differential sensitivities of vegetative growth components , 2005 .

[23]  C. Leeuwen,et al.  Micromorphometric changes in trunk diameter in relation to mild water stress in field grown vines , 2000 .

[24]  J. Gaudillère,et al.  Vines water stress derived from a soil water balance model - sensitivity to soil and training system parameters. , 2005 .

[25]  M. Matthews,et al.  Reproductive Development in Grape (Vitis viniferaL.): Responses to Seasonal Water Deficits , 1989, American Journal of Enology and Viticulture.

[26]  J. Gaudillère,et al.  Étude du régime hydrique et de la nutrition azottée de la vigne par des indicateurs physiologiques. influence sur le comportement de la vigne et la maturation du raisin , 2002 .

[27]  H. Griffiths,et al.  Plant responses to water stress. , 2002, Annals of botany.

[28]  Stefanos Koundouras,et al.  Influence of vineyard location and vine water status on fruit maturation of nonirrigated cv. Agiorgitiko (Vitis vinifera L.). Effects on wine phenolic and aroma components. , 2006, Journal of agricultural and food chemistry.

[29]  G. Seguin,et al.  ‘Terroirs’ and pedology of wine growing , 1986, Experientia.

[30]  J E Begg,et al.  Water potential gradients in field tobacco. , 1970, Plant physiology.

[31]  Cornelis van Leeuwen,et al.  Stem Water Potential is a Sensitive Indicator of Grapevine Water Status , 2001 .

[32]  R. E. Smart,et al.  Sunlight into wine: a handbook for winegrape canopy management. , 1991 .

[33]  Cornelis van Leeuwen,et al.  Influence of Climate, Soil, and Cultivar on Terroir , 2004, American Journal of Enology and Viticulture.

[34]  E. Garnier,et al.  Effect of water stress on stem diameter changes of peach trees growing in the field , 1986 .

[35]  Hans R. Schultz,et al.  Differences in hydraulic architecture account for near‐isohydric and anisohydric behaviour of two field‐grown Vitis vinifera L. cultivars during drought , 2003 .

[36]  N. Ollat,et al.  Carbon isotope composition of sugars in grapevine, an integrated indicator of vineyard water status. , 2002, Journal of experimental botany.

[37]  R. G. Evans,et al.  Nitrogen Fertilization of White Riesling Grapes in Washington. Must and Wine Composition , 1994, American Journal of Enology and Viticulture.