Intrapartum fetal heart rate monitoring.

Intrapartum fetal heart rate monitoring is commonly used to evaluate fetal status in labor, despite a lack of convincing randomized studies to support its use. The National Institutes of Health have helped standardize fetal heart rate monitoring terminology with their 1997 task force report, which will aid clinicians and scientists in their goal of providing quality care and research. The American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists has recommended the term nonreassuring fetal status for electronic fetal monitor patterns that are not normal; however, Vanderbilt continues to use the terms fetal stress and fetal distress, using specific criteria for each. The approximately 30% of fetal heart rate tracings labeled as fetal stress (or nonreassuring fetal status) can be evaluated further by the use of fetal pulse oximetry, a new technology currently under evaluation in this country.

[1]  Z A Brown,et al.  A Randomized Trial of Electronic Fetal Monitoring in Preterm Labor , 1987, Obstetrics and gynecology.

[2]  P. Renou,et al.  Controlled trial of fetal intensive care. , 1976, American journal of obstetrics and gynecology.

[3]  C. Cetrulo,et al.  The evaluation of continuous fetal heart rate monitoring in high-risk pregnancy. , 1976, American journal of obstetrics and gynecology.

[4]  Facog,et al.  Correlation of Fetal Heart Rate‐Uterine Contraction Patterns With Fetal Scalp Blood pH , 1975, Obstetrics and gynecology.

[5]  Letter: Diabetic ketoacidosis presenting as neurosurgical emergencies. , 1974, British medical journal.

[6]  I. Chalmers,et al.  The Dublin randomized controlled trial of intrapartum fetal heart rate monitoring. , 1985, American journal of obstetrics and gynecology.

[7]  P. Shiono,et al.  Reasons for the Rising Cesarean Delivery Rates: 1978–1984 , 1987, Obstetrics and gynecology.

[8]  S. Thacker,et al.  EFFICACY AND SAFETY OF INTRAPARTUM ELECTRONIC FETAL MONITORING: AN UPDATE , 1995, Obstetrics and gynecology.

[9]  S. Neldam,et al.  Intrapartum fetal heart rate monitoring in a combined low- and high-risk population: a controlled clinical trial. , 1986, European journal of obstetrics, gynecology, and reproductive biology.

[10]  F. Maillard,et al.  Multicenter study on the clinical value of fetal pulse oximetry. II. Compared predictive values of pulse oximetry and fetal blood analysis. The French Study Group on Fetal Pulse Oximetry. , 1997, American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology.

[11]  R W Beard,et al.  Influence on clinical practice of routine intra-partum fetal monitoring. , 1975 .

[12]  G. Dildy,et al.  Intrapartum fetal pulse oximetry: past, present, and future. , 1996, American journal of obstetrics and gynecology.

[13]  F. Boehm,et al.  Electronic fetal heart rate monitoring: early neonatal outcomes associated with normal rate, fetal stress, and fetal distress. , 2000, American journal of obstetrics and gynecology.

[14]  A. Vintzileos,et al.  Comparison of intrapartum electronic fetal heart rate monitoring versus intermittent auscultation in detecting fetal acidemia at birth. , 1995, American journal of obstetrics and gynecology.

[15]  H. Thompson,et al.  A controlled trial of the differential effects of intrapartum fetal monitoring. , 1979, American journal of obstetrics and gynecology.

[16]  A Guest Editorial: Monitoring the Fetal Heart , 1995 .

[17]  S. Clark,et al.  Fetal heart rate response to scalp blood sampling. , 1982, American journal of obstetrics and gynecology.

[18]  D. Macdonald,et al.  Electronic fetal heart monitoring, auscultation, and neonatal outcome. , 1991, American journal of obstetrics and gynecology.

[19]  PERINATAL OUTCOME IN MONITORED AND UNMONITORED HIGH‐RISK DELIVERIES , 1978, Israel journal of medical sciences.

[20]  R J Parsons,et al.  An assessment of continuous fetal heart rate monitoring in labor. A randomized trial. , 1978, American journal of obstetrics and gynecology.

[21]  Lee Wk,et al.  The effect of unselected intrapartum fetal monitoring. , 1976 .

[22]  W K Vaughn,et al.  The indirectly obtained fetal heart rate: comparison of first- and second-generation electronic fetal monitors. , 1986, American journal of obstetrics and gynecology.

[23]  R. Post,et al.  Routine Electronic Monitoring of Fetal Heart Rate and Uterine Activity During Labor , 1975, Obstetrics and gynecology.

[24]  R. Myers,et al.  Two patterns of perinatal brain damage and their conditions of occurrence. , 1972, American journal of obstetrics and gynecology.

[25]  M. Kühnert,et al.  Predictive agreement between the fetal arterial oxygen saturation and fetal scalp pH: results of the German multicenter study. , 1998, American journal of obstetrics and gynecology.

[26]  B. Schifrin,et al.  INTRAPARTUM ELECTRONIC FETAL HEART RATE MONITORING VERSUS INTERMITTENT AUSCULTATION: A META‐ANALYSIS , 1995, Obstetrics and gynecology.

[27]  L. Peddle,et al.  Experience with fetal monitoring in a university teaching hospital. , 1975, Canadian Medical Association journal.

[28]  K. Greene,et al.  ELECTRONIC FETAL HEART RATE MONITORING : RESEARCH GUIDELINES FOR INTERPRETATION. AUTHOR'S REPLY , 1997 .

[29]  H W Jongsma,et al.  Intrapartum fetal pulse oximetry: fetal oxygen saturation trends during labor and relation to delivery outcome. , 1994, American journal of obstetrics and gynecology.

[30]  G. Dildy,et al.  The relationship between oxygen saturation and pH in umbilical blood: implications for intrapartum fetal oxygen saturation monitoring. , 1996, American journal of obstetrics and gynecology.

[31]  A. Antsaklis,et al.  A Randomized Trial of Intrapartum Electronic Fetal Heart Rate Monitoring Versus Intermittent Auscultation , 1993, Obstetrics and gynecology.

[32]  Intrapartum fetal heart rate assessment: monitoring by auscultation or electronic means. , 1993, American journal of obstetrics and gynecology.

[33]  S. Clark,et al.  The scalp stimulation test: a clinical alternative to fetal scalp blood sampling. , 1984, American journal of obstetrics and gynecology.

[34]  N. Tejani,et al.  Intrapartum Assessment of Fetal Well‐being: A Comparison of Scalp Stimulation With Scalp Blood pH Sampling , 1997, Obstetrics and gynecology.

[35]  F. Johnstone,et al.  HAS CONTINUOUS INTRAPARTUM MONITORING MADE ANY IMPACT ON FETAL OUTCOME? , 1978, The Lancet.

[36]  P. Renou,et al.  A controlled trial of fetal heart rate monitoring in a low-risk obstetric population. , 1981, American journal of obstetrics and gynecology.