Predictive value of sensory and cognitive evoked potentials for awakening from coma

Objectives: To determine the prognostic role of late auditory (N100) and cognitive evoked potentials (MMN) for awakening in a cohort of comatose patients categorized by etiology. Methods: The authors prospectively studied a series of 346 comatose patients. Coma was caused by stroke (n = 125), trauma (n = 96), anoxia (n = 64), complications of neurosurgery (n = 54), and encephalitis (n = 7). Patients were followed for 12 months and classified as awake or unawake. Univariate and multivariate analyses were performed using regression logistic and Cox models. Results: Pupillary light reflex, N100, middle-latency auditory evoked potentials, age, and etiology were the most discriminating factors for awakening. Statistical analysis showed that pupillary reflex was the strongest prognostic variable for awakening (estimated probability 79.7%). The estimated probability of awakening rose to 87% when N100 was present and to 89.9% when middle-latency evoked potentials (MLAEPs) were present. It was 13.7% when pupillary reflex was absent in anoxic patients. When MMN was present, 88.6% of patients awakened. No patient in whom MMN was present became permanently vegetative. Conclusion: Pupillary reflex is the strongest prognostic variable, followed by N100 and MLAEPs allowing a reliable model for awakening. The presence of MMN is a predictor of awakening and precludes comatose patients from moving to a permanent vegetative state. Evaluation of primary sensory cortex and higher-order processes by middle-latency-, late, and cognitive evoked potentials should be performed in the prognosis for awakening in comatose patients.

[1]  Henry L. Lew,et al.  Predictive value of somatosensory evoked potentials for awakening from coma* , 2003, Critical care medicine.

[2]  J M Wardlaw,et al.  Predicting survival using simple clinical variables: a case study in traumatic brain injury , 1999, Journal of neurology, neurosurgery, and psychiatry.

[3]  B Jennett,et al.  Assessment of outcome after severe brain damage. , 1975, Lancet.

[4]  Vincent Corruble,et al.  Predicting recovery in patients suffering from traumatic brain injury by using admission variables and physiological data: a comparison between decision tree analysis and logistic regression. , 2002, Journal of neurosurgery.

[5]  G. Litscher.  Middle latency auditory evoked potentials in intensive care patients and normal controls. , 1995, The International journal of neuroscience.

[6]  J. Guérit,et al.  ERPs obtained with the auditory oddball paradigm in coma and altered states of consciousness: clinical relationships, prognostic value, and origin of components , 1999, Clinical Neurophysiology.

[7]  S. R. Butler,et al.  Electrophysiological indicator of awakening from coma , 1993, The Lancet.

[8]  Fritz Sterz,et al.  Improved outcome prediction in unconscious cardiac arrest survivors with sensory evoked potentials compared with clinical assessment , 2000, Critical care medicine.

[9]  C. Fischer,et al.  The prognostic value of evoked responses from primary somatosensory and auditory cortex in comatose patients , 2003, Clinical Neurophysiology.

[10]  G. V. Kass.  An Exploratory Technique for Investigating Large Quantities of Categorical Data , 1980 .

[11]  Henry L. Lew,et al.  Use of Somatosensory-Evoked Potentials and Cognitive Event-Related Potentials in Predicting Outcomes of Patients with Severe Traumatic Brain Injury , 2003, American journal of physical medicine & rehabilitation.

[12]  S. Butler,et al.  Coma Outcome Prediction Using Event-Related Potentials: P3 and Mismatch Negativity , 2000, Audiology and Neurotology.

[13]  C. Stoutenbeek,et al.  Systematic review of early prediction of poor outcome in anoxicischaemic coma , 1998, The Lancet.

[14]  R Näätänen,et al.  Mismatch negativity--a unique measure of sensory processing in audition. , 1995, The International journal of neuroscience.

[15]  Multi-Society Task Force on Pvs.  Medical aspects of the persistent vegetative state (1). , 1994, The New England journal of medicine.

[16]  Jan Claassen,et al.  Early recovery after closed traumatic head injury: Somatosensory evoked potentials and clinical findings , 2001, Critical care medicine.

[17]  Multi-Society Task Force on Pvs.  Medical aspects of the persistent vegetative state (2). , 1994, The New England journal of medicine.

[18]  W. Butt,et al.  Review of the use of somatosensory evoked potentials in the prediction of outcome after severe brain injury , 2001, Critical care medicine.

[19]  D Morlet,et al.  Mismatch negativity and late auditory evoked potentials in comatose patients , 1999, Clinical Neurophysiology.

[20]  B. Jennett,et al.  ASSESSMENT OF OUTCOME AFTER SEVERE BRAIN DAMAGE A Practical Scale , 1975, The Lancet.

[21]  J. Giacino,et al.  The minimally conscious state: Definition and diagnostic criteria , 2002, Neurology.

[22]  Dominique Morlet,et al.  Mismatch Negativity and N100 in Comatose Patients , 2000, Audiology and Neurotology.