Unlocking the potential of the Internet to improve college choice: a comparative case study of college-access Web tools

Students and parents rely on Web-based tools to navigate the college-choice process, yet little research has been done to understand this environment. While this shift has made the process easier to navigate for some, we contend that the move will grow an already large digital divide in the USA. We use Hossler and Gallagher's college-choice framework to examine the substance and function of three college-access Web portals. Our findings suggest these tools are likely to serve many students well in the process, but may exacerbate the digital divide with consequences for low-income students.

[1]  Jeneva E. Stone.  The Student Aid Gauntlet: Making Access to College Simple and Certain. Final Report of the Special Study of Simplification of Need Analysis and Application for Title IV Aid. , 2005 .

[2]  Jennifer Brown,et al.  The Composition of Consideration and Choice Sets in Undergraduate University Choice: An Exploratory Study , 2005 .

[3]  Susan M. Dynarski,et al.  The Cost of Complexity in Federal Student Aid: Lessons from Optimal Tax Theory and Behavioral Economics , 2006, National Tax Journal.

[4]  M. Schapiro.  College Choices: The Economics of Where to Go, When to Go, and How to Pay For It , 2005 .

[5]  E. Bettinger,et al.  The Role of Simplification and Information in College Decisions: Results from the H&R Block Fafsa Experiment , 2009 .

[6]  Laura W. Perna.  Understanding the Relationship Between Information About College Prices and Financial Aid and Students’ College-Related Behaviors , 2006 .

[7]  Divided We Fall: The Federal Government Confronts the Digital Divide , 2003 .

[8]  Dc Washington,et al.  Advisory Committee on Student Financial Assistance. , 2005 .

[9]  K. Gallagher,et al.  Studying Student College Choice: A Three-Phase Model and the Implications for Policymakers. , 1987 .

[10]  Ray Morrison,et al.  The Company History , 2003 .

[11]  Laura W. Perna.  STUDYING COLLEGE ACCESS AND CHOICE: A PROPOSED CONCEPTUAL MODEL , 2006 .

[12]  R. Blendon,et al.  Health information, the Internet, and the digital divide. , 2000, Health affairs.

[13]  Jane Hemsley-Brown,et al.  Choosing Futures: Young people's decision-making in education, training and careers markets , 2001 .

[14]  Sylwia Męcfal.  Recenzja książki. Robert K. yin, Case Study Research. Design and Methods (fourth Edition), thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications, 2009 , 2012 .

[15]  R. B.,et al.  The United Nations , 1947, Nature.

[16]  Hsiu-Fang Hsieh,et al.  Three Approaches to Qualitative Content Analysis , 2005, Qualitative health research.

[17]  Patricia M. McDonough,et al.  Choosing Colleges: How Social Class and Schools Structure Opportunity , 1999 .

[18]  Jim Jansen,et al.  Use of the internet in higher-income households , 2009 .

[19]  Thomas J. Kane,et al.  8. Student Perceptions of College Opportunities: The Boston COACH Program , 2004 .

[20]  Heather T. Rowan-Kenyon,et al.  College Knowledge of 9th and 11th Grade Students: Variation by School and State Context , 2009 .

[21]  C. Scott.  Going to college: How social, economic and educational factors influence the decisions students make: Don Hossler, Jack Schmit and Nick Vesper; Johns Hopkins University Press, Baltimore, MD, 1999, pp. vii+ 173, Price U.S. $18.95 paper , 2001 .

[22]  Thomas J. Kane.  The Price of Admission: Rethinking How Americans Pay for College , 1999 .

[23]  Michael B. Paulsen,et al.  Going to College: How Social, Economic, and Educational Factors Influence the Decisions Students Make , 1998 .

[24]  Internet Inequalities , 2006 .

[25]  S. Tefft.  Digital Divide: Civic Engagement, Information Poverty, and the Internet Worldwide , 2002 .