Prediction of neonatal acidemia by computer analysis of fetal heart rate and ST event signals.

OBJECTIVE The objective of the study was to evaluate the accuracy of computer analysis of fetal heart rate (FHR) and ST event signals in prediction of neonatal acidemia. STUDY DESIGN One hundred forty-eight FHR tracings were evaluated to identify red alerts provided by the system, based on automated analysis of FHR and ST event signals, and compared with the occurrence of umbilical artery acidemia (pH < or =7.05). RESULTS The presence of red alerts obtained sensitivity of 1.00 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.56-1.00), specificity of 0.94 (95% CI, 0.89-0.97), positive predictive value (PPV) of 0.47 (95% CI, 0.22-0.72), negative predictive value (NPV) of 1 (95% CI, 0.96-1.00), positive likelihood ratio (PLR) of 17.6 (95% CI, 9.0-34.5), and negative likelihood ratio (NLR) of 0. When limiting analysis to red alerts that did not include ST data, sensitivity was 0.57 (95% CI, 0.20-0.88), specificity was 0.97 (95% CI, 0.92-0.99), PPV was 0.50 (95% CI, 0.17-0.82), NPV was 0.98 (95% CI, 0.93-0.99), PLR was 20.14 (95% CI, 6.3-64.2), and NLR was 0.44 (95% CI, 0.19-1.04). CONCLUSION Computer analysis of FHR and ST event signals provide higher accuracy in predicting neonatal academia.

[1]  R. Huch,et al.  Guidelines for blood sampling and measurement of pH and blood gas values in obstetrics. Based upon a workshop held in Zurich, Switzerland, March 19, 1993 by an Ad Hoc Committee. , 1994, European journal of obstetrics, gynecology, and reproductive biology.

[2]  J. Fleiss.  Statistical methods for rates and proportions , 1974 .

[3]  A Costa-Pereira,et al.  Inconsistencies in classification by experts of cardiotocograms and subsequent clinical decision , 1999, British journal of obstetrics and gynaecology.

[4]  J. Bernardes,et al.  Evaluation of interobserver agreement of cardiotocograms , 1997, International journal of gynaecology and obstetrics: the official organ of the International Federation of Gynaecology and Obstetrics.

[5]  F. M. James,et al.  A further study of general anaesthesia for Caesarean section. , 1976, British journal of anaesthesia.

[6]  R. T. Lie,et al.  The association of Apgar score with subsequent death and cerebral palsy: A population-based study in term infants. , 2001, The Journal of pediatrics.

[7]  P. V. Nielsen,et al.  Computer Assessment of the Intrapartum Cardiotocogram , 1988 .

[8]  A Hasman,et al.  Interobserver variation in the assessment of fetal heart rate recordings. , 1993, European journal of obstetrics, gynecology, and reproductive biology.

[9]  G S Dawes,et al.  System 8000: Computerized antenatal FHR analysis , 1991, Journal of perinatal medicine.

[10]  J. Bernardes,et al.  Early, variable and late decelerations: can a consensus be reached in their identification? , 1999, International journal of gynaecology and obstetrics: the official organ of the International Federation of Gynaecology and Obstetrics.

[11]  S. Arulkumaran,et al.  Review of the first 1502 cases of ECG‐ST waveform analysis during labour in a teaching hospital , 2007 .

[12]  R D Keith,et al.  A multicentre comparative study of 17 experts and an intelligent computer system for managing labour using the cardiotocogram , 1995, British journal of obstetrics and gynaecology.

[13]  J. Downing,et al.  Extradural analgesia for caesarean section: a comparison with general anaesthesia. , 1979, British journal of anaesthesia.

[14]  G S Dawes,et al.  Improvements in the registration and analysis of fetal heart rate records at the bedside , 1985, British journal of obstetrics and gynaecology.

[15]  A. Ugwumadu,et al.  Limitations of ST analysis in clinical practice: three cases of intrapartum metabolic acidosis , 2008, BJOG : an international journal of obstetrics and gynaecology.

[16]  João Bernardes,et al.  Prediction of neonatal state by computer analysis of fetal heart rate tracings: the antepartum arm of the SisPorto multicentre validation study. , 2005, European journal of obstetrics, gynecology, and reproductive biology.

[17]  J. P. Marques de Sá,et al.  The Porto system for automated cardiotocographic signal analysis , 1991, Journal of perinatal medicine.

[18]  Ana Paula Rocha,et al.  Linear and nonlinear analysis of heart rate patterns associated with fetal behavioral states in the antepartum period. , 2007, Early human development.

[19]  J. Bernardes,et al.  Objective computerized fetal heart rate analysis , 1998, International journal of gynaecology and obstetrics: the official organ of the International Federation of Gynaecology and Obstetrics.

[20]  Diogo Ayres-de-Campos,et al.  Can the reproducibility of fetal heart rate baseline estimation be improved? , 2004, European journal of obstetrics, gynecology, and reproductive biology.

[21]  A Costa-Pereira,et al.  The effect of different sampling intervals on the measurement of intrapartum fetal heart rate variability. , 1997, Obstetrics and gynecology.

[22]  Ana Paula Rocha,et al.  Linear and nonlinear fetal heart rate analysis of normal and acidemic fetuses in the minutes preceding delivery , 2006, Medical and Biological Engineering and Computing.

[23]  J. Bernardes,et al.  Computer quantification of short‐term variability as an adjunct to fetal electrocardiographic monitoring , 2007, BJOG : an international journal of obstetrics and gynaecology.

[24]  Diogo Ayres-de-Campos,et al.  Omniview-SisPorto 3.5 - a central fetal monitoring station with online alerts based on computerized cardiotocogram+ST event analysis. , 2008, Journal of perinatal medicine.

[25]  W. Grove.  Statistical Methods for Rates and Proportions, 2nd ed , 1981 .

[26]  J. Low,et al.  Intrapartum fetal asphyxia: definition, diagnosis, and classification. , 1997, American journal of obstetrics and gynecology.

[27]  Newborn,et al.  Apgar score , 2009, Radiopaedia.org.

[28]  N. Paneth,et al.  Electronic Fetal Monitoring and Later Outcome , 1993, Clinical and investigative medicine. Medecine clinique et experimentale.

[29]  João Bernardes,et al.  Computerized estimation of the baseline fetal heart rate in labour: the low frequency line , 1998, British journal of obstetrics and gynaecology.

[30]  K. Maršál,et al.  Fetal electrocardiogram: ST waveform analysis in intrapartum surveillance , 2007, BJOG : an international journal of obstetrics and gynaecology.

[31]  Some concerns about the new research guidelines for interpretation of electronic fetal heart rate monitoring. , 1998, American journal of obstetrics and gynecology.

[32]  Z. J. Yang,et al.  The prediction of fetal acidosis at birth by computerised analysis of intrapartum cardiotocography , 1995, British journal of obstetrics and gynaecology.

[33]  D. Ayres-de- Campos,et al.  SisPorto 2.0: a program for automated analysis of cardiotocograms. , 2000, The Journal of maternal-fetal medicine.

[34]  K. Leveno,et al.  The continuing value of the Apgar score for the assessment of newborn infants. , 2001 .

[35]  J. Westgate,et al.  Umbilical cord blood gas analysis at delivery: a time for quality data , 1994, British journal of obstetrics and gynaecology.

[36]  Chrysostomos D. Stylios,et al.  Novel approach for fetal heart rate classification introducing grammatical evolution , 2007, Biomed. Signal Process. Control..

[37]  Computer Assessment of the Intrapartum Cardiotocogram , 1988, Acta obstetricia et gynecologica Scandinavica.

[38]  Further concerns about the National Institute of Child Health and Human Development guidelines for interpretation of electronic fetal heart rate monitoring. , 2001, American journal of obstetrics and gynecology.

[39]  Ana Paula Rocha,et al.  Internal versus external intrapartum foetal heart rate monitoring: the effect on linear and nonlinear parameters , 2006, Physiological measurement.