Attitudes of nursing staff towards electronic patient records: a questionnaire survey.

BACKGROUND A growing number of health care organizations are implementing a system of electronic patient records (EPR). This implies a change in work routines for nursing staff, but it could also be regarded as an opportunity to improve the quality of care. OBJECTIVE The objective of this paper is to obtain more insight into the usefulness of EPR as perceived by nursing staff and to clarify the determinants of nursing staff's acceptance of EPR. Determinants were tested using an extended version of the Technology Acceptance Model. DESIGN Nursing staff members (NAs and RNs) completed a survey questionnaire about the use of EPR in health care, and their experiences, perceptions and attitudes regarding EPR. SETTINGS All nursing staff members were working in Dutch hospitals, psychiatric organizations, care organizations for mentally retarded people, home care organizations, nursing homes or homes for the elderly. PARTICIPANTS The study population is a nationally representative Dutch research sample, further referred to as the Nursing Staff Panel. The Panel consists of a permanent group of Nursing Assistants (NAs) and Registered Nurses (RNs), who are prepared to fill in a postal questionnaire twice a year on average. In January 2009, 685 participants completed the questionnaire. RESULTS Nursing staff members associate EPR with improved care, especially qualitatively better and safer care. They also expect an increase in costs of care, while anticipating only a relatively small rise in the number of patients that can be cared for. In general, the effects of EPR on the work circumstances of nursing staff are expected to be negative. Job-related characteristics were found to be determinants of attitudes towards using EPR. A relatively positive attitude towards EPR was found in three categories of nursing staff in particular, i.e. staff working at least 30h per week, staff already using EPR and staff working in hospitals. Nursing staff in management positions also tend to have a more positive attitude. When the Technology Acceptance Model was tested, attitudes towards EPR were primarily associated with job-related characteristics and perceived usefulness with respect to quality of care. CONCLUSIONS The implementation strategies for EPR need to take account of the job characteristics of the intended future users. If implementation is to be successful, it is important that the users understand the beneficial effects of EPR on the quality of care.

[1]  Jonathan M. Teich,et al.  Research Paper: Implementation of Physician Order Entry: User Satisfaction and Self-Reported usage Patterns , 1996, J. Am. Medical Informatics Assoc..

[2]  C. Nilsson,et al.  Swedish District Nurses’ Attitudes to Implement Information and Communication Technology in Home Nursing , 2008, The open nursing journal.

[3]  Marie Fogelberg Dahm,et al.  Nurses' experiences of and opinions about using standardised care plans in electronic health records--a questionnaire study. , 2008, Journal of clinical nursing.

[4]  Venkateshviswanath,et al.  A Theoretical Extension of the Technology Acceptance Model , 2000 .

[5]  Fred D. Davis Perceived Usefulness, Perceived Ease of Use, and User Acceptance of Information Technology , 1989, MIS Q..

[6]  J. Marc Overhage,et al.  Research Paper: Controlled Trial of Direct Physician Order Entry: Effects on Physicians' Time Utilization in Ambulatory Primary Care Internal Medicine Practices , 2001, J. Am. Medical Informatics Assoc..

[7]  S. Timmons Nurses resisting information technology. , 2003, Nursing inquiry.

[8]  Anke J. E. de Veer,et al.  Factors influencing the implementation of clinical guidelines for health care professionals: A systematic meta-review , 2008, BMC Medical Informatics Decis. Mak..

[9]  T. Paulussen,et al.  Determinants of innovation within health care organizations: literature review and Delphi study. , 2004, International journal for quality in health care : journal of the International Society for Quality in Health Care.

[10]  Kathy Smith,et al.  Evaluating the Impact of Computerized Clinical Documentation , 2005, Computers, informatics, nursing : CIN.

[11]  Carol S. Bond,et al.  Nurses' requirements for information technology: a challenge for educators. , 2007, International journal of nursing studies.

[12]  Ping Yu,et al.  Health IT acceptance factors in long-term care facilities: A cross-sectional survey , 2009, Int. J. Medical Informatics.

[13]  Jürgen Stausberg,et al.  Value of the electronic patient record: An analysis of the literature , 2008, J. Biomed. Informatics.

[14]  Thomas W Dillon,et al.  Nursing Attitudes and Images of Electronic Patient Record Systems , 2005, Computers, informatics, nursing : CIN.

[15]  Fred D. Davis,et al.  A Theoretical Extension of the Technology Acceptance Model: Four Longitudinal Field Studies , 2000, Management Science.

[16]  Shu Yu,et al.  Applying the technology acceptance model to explore public health nurses' intentions towards web-based learning: a cross-sectional questionnaire survey. , 2008, International journal of nursing studies.