The Construction Morphology analysis of Chinese word formation

The lexicon of Modern Chinese is characterised by a preponderance of multimorphemic words, which are typically built from lexical morphemes, either bound or free. Compounding, broadly understood as the combination of two or more lexical morphemes, is by far the most common word formation device in the modern language. While drawing a sharp boundary between compounding and derivation for Chinese has proven difficult, there are indeed a number of items which possess derivation-like features, including bound status, fixed position, and a stable, often bleached meaning. Moreover, bound items, sometimes without morphemic status, may acquire the meaning of a word as part of a construction, and generate new words and constructions with that acquired meaning. In this chapter, we will apply the principles of CxM to the analysis of Chinese complex words, showing how a constructional approach may best explain several phenomena which are characteristic of Chinese word formation, including the genesis of new meanings for lexical morphemes as part of word formation schemas, rather than in isolation. Also, we will show that the parameter of headedness in compounding may not be set for the language as a whole, but is rather specified in schemas.

[1]  G Arcodia A Construction Morphology account of derivation in Mandarin Chinese , 2011 .

[2]  Diachrony and the polysemy of derivational affixes , 2014 .

[3]  R. Sproat,et al.  A corpus-based analysis of Mandarin nominal root compound , 1996 .

[4]  Laurie Bauer,et al.  The Borderline between Derivation and Compounding , 2005 .

[5]  N. Kula,et al.  Modes of compounding in Bantu, Romance and Chinese , 2011 .

[6]  Uriel Weinreich,et al.  On semantics , 1980 .

[7]  Bianca Basciano Verbal compounding and causativity in Mandarin Chinese , 2010 .

[8]  R. Sproat,et al.  The Cross-Linguistic Distribution of Adjective Ordering Restrictions , 1991 .

[9]  Bianca Basciano,et al.  Compound headedness in Chinese: an analysis of neologisms , 2007 .

[10]  A. Goldberg Constructions: A Construction Grammar Approach to Argument Structure , 1995 .

[11]  Dany Amiot Between compounding and derivation: Elements of word-formation corresponding to prepositions , 2004 .

[12]  Geert Booij,et al.  Construction Morphology and the Lexicon , 2007 .

[13]  Po-ching Yip,et al.  The Chinese Lexicon : A Comprehensive Survey , 2000 .

[14]  Oi Yee Kwong Categorial Fluidity in Chinese and its Implications for Part-of-speech Tagging , 2003, EACL.

[15]  Angela Ralli,et al.  Compounding versus derivation , 2010 .

[16]  Antonietta Bisetto,et al.  Selection in Compounding and Derivation , 2005 .

[17]  Lajos Marosán The Meaning of Word Classes , 2006 .

[18]  Janet Zhiqun Xing Teaching and Learning Chinese as a Foreign Language: A Pedagogical Grammar , 2006 .

[19]  Balthasar Bickel,et al.  Language Typology and Syntactic Description: Inflectional morphology , 2007 .

[20]  Bernhard Wälchli,et al.  Co-compounds and natural coordination , 2005 .

[21]  Antonietta Bisetto,et al.  The Classification of Compounds , 2011 .

[22]  Walter Bisang,et al.  What makes grammaticalization? : a look from its fringes and its components , 2004 .

[23]  Walter Bisang,et al.  Areal Typology and Grammaticalization: Processes of Grammaticalization Based on Nouns and Verbs in East and Mainland South East Asian Languages , 1996 .

[24]  G Arcodia Lexical Derivation in Mandarin Chinese , 2012 .

[25]  Bianca Basciano,et al.  The Chinese Language and Some Notions from Western Linguistics , 2009 .

[26]  Alexandra Y. Aikhenvald,et al.  Word: Word: a typological framework , 2003 .

[27]  Geert Booij,et al.  Compounding and derivation: Evidence for Construction Morphology , 2005 .

[28]  Nobuko Koyama GROUNDING AND DEIXIS: A COMPREHENSIVE APPROACH TO THE GROUNDING PHENOMENON IN JAPANESE NARRATIVE ∗ , 2004 .

[29]  G Arcodia,et al.  Constructions and headedness in derivation and compounding , 2012 .

[30]  Jerome L. Packard Chinese as an Isolating Language , 2006 .

[31]  G. Arcodia Coordinating nominal compounds: Universal vs. areal tendencies , 2018, Linguistics.

[32]  Y. R. Chao,et al.  A Grammar of Spoken Chinese , 1970 .

[33]  Charles N. Li,et al.  Mandarin Chinese: A Functional Reference Grammar , 1989 .

[34]  Sergio Scalise,et al.  Classification, Structure and Headedness of Chinese Compounds , 2006 .

[35]  B. Heine,et al.  Grammaticalization: A Conceptual Framework , 1991 .

[36]  C. Melloni,et al.  Areal perspectives on total reduplication of verbs in Sinitic , 2015 .