Fundamental concepts of reactive control for autonomous drones

Autonomous drones represent a new breed of mobile computing system. Compared to smartphones and connected cars that only opportunistically sense or communicate, drones allow motion control to become part of the application logic. The efficiency of their movements is largely dictated by the low-level control enabling their autonomous operation based on high-level inputs. Existing implementations of such low-level control operate in a time-triggered fashion. In contrast, we conceive a notion of reactive control that allows drones to execute the low-level control logic only upon recognizing the need to, based on the influence of the environment onto the drone operation. As a result, reactive control can dynamically adapt the control rate. This brings fundamental benefits, including more accurate motion control, extended lifetime, and better quality of service in end-user applications. Based on 260+ hours of real-world experiments using three aerial drones, three different control logic, and three hardware platforms, we demonstrate, for example, up to 41% improvements in motion accuracy and up to 22% improvements in flight time.

[1]  Gregory S. Chirikjian,et al.  Modular Self-Reconfigurable Robot Systems [Grand Challenges of Robotics] , 2007, IEEE Robotics & Automation Magazine.

[2]  F. Nex,et al.  UAV for 3D mapping applications: a review , 2014 .

[3]  Carlo Ghezzi,et al.  Team-level programming of drone sensor networks , 2014, SenSys.

[4]  Mirco Musolesi,et al.  Sensing meets mobile social networks: the design, implementation and evaluation of the CenceMe application , 2008, SenSys '08.

[5]  Vijay Kumar,et al.  Cooperative manipulation and transportation with aerial robots , 2009, Auton. Robots.

[6]  David W. Hosmer,et al.  Applied Logistic Regression , 1991 .

[7]  Kamin Whitehouse,et al.  Reactive Control of Autonomous Drones , 2016, MobiSys.

[8]  Jonathan Edwards,et al.  Coherent reaction , 2009, OOPSLA Companion.

[9]  Brian Jones,et al.  Captain Buzz: An All-Smartphone Autonomous Delta-Wing Drone , 2015, DroNet@MobiSys.

[10]  George A. Bekey,et al.  AUTONOMOUS ROBOTS, From Biological Inspiration to Implementation and Control, by G.A. Bekey, MIT Press, 2005, xv + 577 pp., index, ISBN 0-262-02578-7, 25 pages of references (Hb. £35.95) , 2005, Robotica.

[11]  Enrico Natalizio,et al.  Filming Sport Events with Mobile Camera Drones: Mathematical Modeling and Algorithms , 2012 .

[12]  D. P. Atherton,et al.  Automatic tuning of optimum PID controllers , 1993 .

[13]  Vijay Kumar,et al.  Decentralized formation control with variable shapes for aerial robots , 2012, 2012 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation.

[14]  Wolfram Burgard,et al.  Collaborative multi-robot exploration , 2000, Proceedings 2000 ICRA. Millennium Conference. IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation. Symposia Proceedings (Cat. No.00CH37065).

[15]  Tore Hägglund,et al.  Advanced PID Control , 2005 .

[16]  Christian Stöcker,et al.  Event-Based Control , 2014 .

[17]  Roland Siegwart,et al.  PID vs LQ control techniques applied to an indoor micro quadrotor , 2004, 2004 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems (IROS) (IEEE Cat. No.04CH37566).

[18]  Iman Sadeghzadeh,et al.  Actuator fault-tolerant control based on Gain-Scheduled PID with application to fixed-wing Unmanned Aerial Vehicle , 2013, 2013 Conference on Control and Fault-Tolerant Systems (SysTol).

[19]  Wolfgang De Meuter,et al.  A survey on reactive programming , 2013, CSUR.

[20]  Raffaello D'Andrea,et al.  Cooperative quadrocopter ball throwing and catching , 2012, 2012 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems.

[21]  Gregory S. Chirikjian,et al.  Modular Self-Reconfigurable Robot Systems , 2007 .

[22]  Tom Mens,et al.  A survey of software refactoring , 2004, IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering.

[23]  Luca Mottola,et al.  Model-based Real-time Testing of Drone Autopilots , 2016, DroNet@MobiSys.