Capital Structure and Innovation Trajectory: The Role of Debt in Balancing Exploration and Exploitation

We examine the role of debt as a governance mechanism in balancing exploration and exploitation. We argue that while equity is conducive to uncertain exploration critical for innovation, debt provides countervailing incentives for engaging in exploitation by imposing cash flow obligations and the threat of bankruptcy. As a consequence, debt becomes a vital instrument in directing innovation along the optimal trajectory, while preventing the balance from shifting too far toward suboptimal exploration. To support our arguments, drawing on patent data, we first demonstrate that a firm’s leverage is positively related to knowledge exploitation activity as reflected in its self-citations. Next, we show that firms that have potentially engaged in suboptimal exploration, as manifest in underutilized stocks of proprietary knowledge, are likely to experience leverage increases in the short run, and these leverage increases in turn result in subsequent increases in self-citations. These effects are consistent with ...

[1]  Bronwyn H Hall,et al.  The Impact of Corporate Restructuring on Industrial Research and Development , 1989, Brookings Papers on Economic Activity. Microeconomics.

[2]  P. Bolton,et al.  An incomplete contracts approach to financial contracting , 1992 .

[3]  Rosemarie H. Ziedonis Don't Fence Me in: Fragmented Markets for Technology and the Patent Acquisition Strategies of Firms , 2003, Manag. Sci..

[4]  M. Gittelman,et al.  Patent Citations as a Measure of Knowledge Flows: The Influence of Examiner Citations , 2006, The Review of Economics and Statistics.

[5]  Rosemarie H. Ziedonis,et al.  Reputations for Toughness in Patent Enforcement: Implications for Knowledge Spillovers via Inventor Mobility , 2007 .

[6]  M. Trajtenberg,et al.  University Versus Corporate Patents: A Window On The Basicness Of Invention , 1997 .

[7]  A. Nerkar,et al.  Beyond local search: boundary‐spanning, exploration, and impact in the optical disk industry , 2001 .

[8]  Clayton M. Christensen EXPLORING THE LIMITS OF THE TECHNOLOGY S‐CURVE. PART I: COMPONENT TECHNOLOGIES , 1992 .

[9]  Mary J. Benner,et al.  Process Management and Technological Innovation: A Longitudinal Study of the Photography and Paint Industries , 2002 .

[10]  Sudheer Chava,et al.  How Does Financing Impact Investment? The Role of Debt Covenants , 2007 .

[11]  M. C. Jensen,et al.  The Modern Industrial Revolution, Exit, and the Failure of Internal Control Systems , 1993, A Theory of the Firm.

[12]  Pierre Azoulay,et al.  Incentives and Creativity: Evidence from the Academic Life Sciences , 2009 .

[13]  Stuart C. Gilson Management turnover and financial distress , 1989 .

[14]  Campbell R. Harvey,et al.  The Theory and Practice of Corporate Finance: Evidence from the Field , 1999 .

[15]  Bhaven N. Sampat,et al.  When Do Applicants Search for Prior Art? , 2010, The Journal of Law and Economics.

[16]  D. Ravenscraft,et al.  LBOs, debt and R&D intensity , 1993 .

[17]  David C. Mowery,et al.  Learning to Patent: Institutional Experience, Learning, and the Characteristics of U.S. University Patents After the Bayh-Dole Act, 1981-1992 , 2002 .

[18]  Ken G. Smith,et al.  The interplay between exploration and exploitation. , 2006 .

[19]  Jonathan O'Brien,et al.  The capital structure implications of pursuing a strategy of innovation , 2003 .

[20]  J. March Exploration and exploitation in organizational learning , 1991, STUDI ORGANIZZATIVI.

[21]  David L. Deeds,et al.  Exploration and Exploitation Alliances in Biotechnology: A System of New Product Development , 2004 .

[22]  O. Williamson Corporate Finance and Corporate Governance , 1988 .

[23]  R. Katila,et al.  Technological acquisitions and the innovation performance of acquiring firms: a longitudinal study , 2001 .

[24]  N. Bloom,et al.  Does management really work? , 2012, Harvard business review.

[25]  Kenneth M. Ayotte,et al.  Creditor Control and Conflict in Chapter 11 , 2008 .

[26]  H. Chesbrough,et al.  Making sense of corporate venture capital. , 2002, Harvard business review.

[27]  J. Hennart,et al.  Explaining the swollen middle : Why most transactions are a mix of market and hierarchy , 1993 .

[28]  K. Clark,et al.  Creating project plans to focus product development. , 1992, Harvard business review.

[29]  R. Katila,et al.  Where do resources come from? The role of idiosyncratic situations , 2004 .

[30]  A. Bhide,et al.  Bootstrap finance: the art of start-ups. , 1992, Harvard business review.

[31]  D. Teece Firm organization, industrial structure, and technological innovation☆ , 1996 .

[32]  D. Cvijanovic,et al.  Real estate prices and rm capital structure , 2011 .

[33]  M. Tushman,et al.  Exploration and Exploitation Within and Across Organizations , 2010 .

[34]  Josh Lerner,et al.  The Financing of R&D and Innovation , 2009 .

[35]  Jesper B. Sørensen,et al.  Aging, Obsolescence, and Organizational Innovation , 2000 .

[36]  T. Yoshikawa,et al.  The Implications of Debt Heterogeneity for R&D Investment and Firm Performance , 2008 .