Spatial compounding in ultrasonic imaging using an articulated scan arm.

A spatial compounding system has been designed to improve the quality of B-mode echographic images. It consists of constructing an improved image from the combination of several different images of the same cross-sectional plane. The "final" image is constructed by the registration and the superposition of the "original" images. For this, the relative position in the space of the original images has to be known. The use of a localization articulated arm, on which the ultrasonic probe is fixed, makes this possible. The main advantages of the technique are, on one hand, the elimination of the acoustic shadows following a strong reflector structure and, on the other hand, the reduction of the speckle generated in echographic images. The method of reconstruction has been validated on agar gel phantoms and provides good accuracy. In vivo experiments on human beings have also been performed. Acoustic shadows caused by bones in cross-sectional images of the thigh and the arm are eliminated. All the contours of the femur and humerus can be observed in the final images. The reduction of speckle is shown in kidney images and the signal-to-noise ratio improvement is quantified as a function of the number of images involved in the reconstruction.

[1]  S.A. Goss,et al.  Computed Ultrasonic Reflection Tomography , 1987, IEEE Transactions on Ultrasonics, Ferroelectrics and Frequency Control.

[2]  S.W. Smith,et al.  Speckle Pattern Correlation with Lateral Aperture Translation: Experimental Results and Implications for Spatial Compounding , 1986, IEEE Transactions on Ultrasonics, Ferroelectrics and Frequency Control.

[3]  J M Rubin,et al.  Pseudo-three-dimensional reconstruction of ultrasonic images of the tongue. , 1989, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[4]  James F. Greenleaf,et al.  Ultrasound transmission and reflection computerized tomography for imaging bones and adjoining soft tissues , 1988, IEEE 1988 Ultrasonics Symposium Proceedings..

[5]  M Friedrich,et al.  Computerized ultrasound echo tomography of the breast. , 1982, European journal of radiology.

[6]  D. King,et al.  Three‐dimensional spatial registration and interactive display of position and orientation of real‐time ultrasound images. , 1990, Journal of ultrasound in medicine : official journal of the American Institute of Ultrasound in Medicine.

[7]  J C Bamber,et al.  Compensation for the signal processing characteristics of ultrasound B-mode scanners in adaptive speckle reduction. , 1993, Ultrasound in medicine & biology.

[8]  J. Greenleaf,et al.  Clinical Imaging with Transmissive Ultrasonic Computerized Tomography , 1981, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[9]  M. Diament,et al.  Ultrasound and the diagnosis of renal and ureteral calculi. , 1986, The Journal of pediatrics.

[10]  R. F. Wagner,et al.  Gray Level Transforms and Lesion Detectability in Echographic Images , 1988 .

[11]  C. Burckhardt Speckle in ultrasound B-mode scans , 1978, IEEE Transactions on Sonics and Ultrasonics.

[12]  R. Popp,et al.  In Vitro Evaluation of an Ultrasonic Three-Dimensional Imaging and Volume System , 1982, Ultrasonic imaging.

[13]  Olaf T. von Ramm,et al.  Compound Scanning with a Phased Array , 1982 .

[14]  Henry Fuchs,et al.  3D ultrasound display using optical tracking , 1990, [1990] Proceedings of the First Conference on Visualization in Biomedical Computing.

[15]  P. Wells Biomedical Ultrasonics , 1977 .

[16]  T A Whittingham,et al.  The use of measured acoustic speed distributions in reflection ultrasound CT , 1992 .

[17]  Arie E. Kaufman,et al.  3-dimensional acquisition and visualization of ultrasound data (Proceedings Only) , 1992, Other Conferences.

[18]  A. Collet Billon,et al.  3D Echography: Status and Perspective , 1990 .

[19]  G. Herman,et al.  3D Imaging In Medicine , 1991 .

[20]  R Graf,et al.  Fundamentals of Sonographic Diagnosis of Infant Hip Dysplasia , 1984, Journal of pediatric orthopedics.