This article deals with how a major top‐down reform in Norwegian higher education has affected student writing, and teachers’ and students’ roles. The Quality Reform was strongly influenced by the Bologna Declaration and was implemented from 2002. One of the outcomes was that, while Norwegian universities previously demanded very little undergraduate writing before the traditional sit‐down examination, most courses now include student essay writing and teacher feedback. Portfolio assessment, which demands extended writing, has been introduced. The article presents some results from an evaluation of the reform, and the following questions are discussed: (1) why did the reform change writing practices; (2) what other factors have contributed to the change; (3) in what ways have the changes in writing practices affected students and teachers; and (4) what are unintended results and critical factors in the future development of writing in the aftermath of the reform?
[1]
Olga Dysthe,et al.
Professors as Mediators of Academic Text Cultures
,
2002
.
[2]
Lorrie A. Shepard,et al.
The Role of Classroom Assessment in Teaching and Learning. CSE Technical Report.
,
2000
.
[3]
James Britton,et al.
Language and Learning
,
1970
.
[4]
C. Gipps.
Beyond Testing: Towards a Theory of Educational Assessment
,
1994
.
[5]
Paul A Prior,et al.
Writing/Disciplinarity: A Sociohistoric Account of Literate Activity in the Academy
,
1998
.
[6]
Larry Cuban.
How Teachers Taught: Constancy and Change in American Classrooms, 1890-1990
,
1984
.
[7]
Stig Mjelstad,et al.
New and Changing Teacher Roles in Higher Education in a Digital Age
,
2007,
J. Educ. Technol. Soc..
[8]
Mary R. Lea,et al.
Student Writing in Higher Education: New Contexts.
,
2000
.
[9]
S. Engel.
Thought and Language
,
1964
.