Analyzing user's task-driven interaction in mixed reality

Mixed reality (MR) provides exciting interaction approaches in several applications. The user experience of interacting in these visually rich environments depends highly on the way the user perceives, processes, and comprehends visual information. In this work we are investigating the differences between Field Dependent - Field Independent users towards their interaction behavior in a MR environment when they were asked to perform a specific task. A study was conducted using Microsoft HoloLens device in which participants interacted with a popular HoloLens application, modified by the authors to log user interaction data in real time. Analysis of the results demonstrates the differences in the visual processing of information, especially in visually complex environments and the impact on the user's interaction behavior.

[1]  Chih-Ming Chen,et al.  Interactive augmented reality system for enhancing library instruction in elementary schools , 2013, Comput. Educ..

[2]  Paul Milgram,et al.  Perceptual issues in augmented reality , 1996, Electronic Imaging.

[3]  S. A. Karp,et al.  Stability of cognitive style from childhood to young adulthood. , 1967, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[4]  Mark Billinghurst,et al.  A Survey of Augmented Reality , 2015, Found. Trends Hum. Comput. Interact..

[5]  Ronald Azuma,et al.  A Survey of Augmented Reality , 1997, Presence: Teleoperators & Virtual Environments.

[6]  C. A. Moore,et al.  FIELD‐DEPENDENT AND FIELD‐INDEPENDENT COGNITIVE STYLES AND THEIR EDUCATIONAL IMPLICATIONS , 1975 .

[7]  Andrew Laghos,et al.  Field Dependence-Independence and Eye Movement Patterns: Investigating Users' Differences Through an Eye Tracking Study , 2016, Interact. Comput..

[8]  Iulian Radu,et al.  Augmented reality in education: a meta-review and cross-media analysis , 2014, Personal and Ubiquitous Computing.

[9]  Nikolaos M. Avouris,et al.  Effects of mixed-reality on players' behaviour and immersion in a cultural tourism game: A cognitive processing perspective , 2018, Int. J. Hum. Comput. Stud..

[10]  Markus Löchtefeld,et al.  Analysing the effect of tangibile user interfaces on spatial memory , 2017, SUI.

[11]  Paul A. Kirschner,et al.  Field dependence-independence and instructional-design effects on learners' performance with a computer-modeling tool , 2009, Comput. Hum. Behav..

[12]  Marios Belk,et al.  Influences of Users' Cognitive Strategies on Graphical Password Composition , 2017, CHI Extended Abstracts.