Application of Variable Leading-Edge Roughness for Transition Control. on Swept Wings

For transition to turbulence in crossflow-dominated swept-wing boundary layers, details of the strongly nonlinear nature of the stationary primary instability are well understood both experimentally and theoretically. It is the particular action of the nonlinearities that makes possible a transition control scheme using subcritically spaced leading-edge surface roughness arrays. What is desired is a means by which this scheme can be generalized to all cases of crossflow-dominated transition. To this end, two elements are presented here: a experimental examination of the process by which the primary instability generates a high-frequency secondary instability that leads to breakdown and a prototype system of pneumatically driven surface roughness actuators that can provide the correct control input for the transition suppression scheme. The key experimental results are that both mode shape and growth data show that the secondary instability is indeed the key factor in triggering breakdown of crossflow boundary layers and that the location of the secondary instability mode explains the nature of breakdown patterns observed in naphthalene flow-visualization experiments. The actuator system is shown to be capable of producing a transition effect.

[1]  William S. Saric,et al.  A high-frequency, secondary instability of crossflow vortices that leads to transition , 1991 .

[2]  Mujeeb R. Malik,et al.  Crossflow disturbances in three-dimensional boundary layers: nonlinear development, wave interaction and secondary instability , 1994, Journal of Fluid Mechanics.

[3]  William S. Saric,et al.  Boundary-layer transition detection and structure identification through surface shear-stress measurements , 1998 .

[4]  Tim S. Haynes,et al.  Simulation of swept-wing vortices using nonlinear parabolized stability equations , 2000, Journal of Fluid Mechanics.

[5]  H. Bippes,et al.  Disturbance Growth in an Unstable Three-Dimensional Boundary Layer , 1990 .

[6]  Mark S. Reibert,et al.  Effect of Isolated Micron-Sized Roughness on Transition in Swept-Wing Flows , 1999 .

[7]  William S. Saric,et al.  Nonlinear Stability and Transition in 3-D Boundary Layers , 1998 .

[8]  Yasuaki Kohama,et al.  Stability characteristics of stationary crossflow vortices in three-dimensional boundary layer , 1999 .

[9]  Eli Reshotko,et al.  Progress, accomplishments and issues in transition research , 1997 .

[10]  J. D. Crouch,et al.  Transition Prediction and Control for Airplane Applications , 1997 .

[11]  William S. Saric,et al.  Review of Swept-Wing Transition , 1997 .

[12]  Dagenhart J. Ray,et al.  Crossflow Stability and Transition Experiments in Swept-Wing Flow , 1999 .

[13]  J. Cousteix,et al.  LAMINAR-TURBULENT TRANSITION IN SUBSONIC BOUNDARY LAYERS : RESEARCH AND APPLICATIONS IN FRANCE , 1997 .

[14]  H. Bippes,et al.  Basic experiments on transition in three-dimensional boundary layers dominated by crossflow instability , 1999 .

[15]  J. Crouch,et al.  Receptivity of three-dimensional boundary layers , 1993 .

[16]  M. Malik,et al.  Nonlinear Crossflow Disturbances and Secondary Instabilities in Swept-Wing Boundary Layers , 1996 .

[17]  D. I. A. Poll,et al.  Some observations of the transition process on the windward face of a long yawed cylinder , 1985, Journal of Fluid Mechanics.

[18]  William S. Saric,et al.  Leading-Edge Roughness as a Transition Control Mechanism , 1998 .

[19]  William S. Saric,et al.  Experiments in nonlinear saturation of stationary crossflow vortices in a swept-wing boundary layer , 1996 .

[20]  H. Deyhle,et al.  Disturbance growth in an unstable three-dimensional boundary layer and its dependence on environmental conditions , 1996, Journal of Fluid Mechanics.

[21]  Yury Kachanov Experimental studies of three-dimensional instability of boundary layers , 1996 .