Decision-making processes in group departures of cattle.

To keep social cohesiveness, group-living animals have to reach consensus decisions through recruitment processes. This implies that decisionmaking depends on the behaviours and social relationships of several group members at different stages of movements. We tested these assumptions in a group of fifteen 18-mo-old Charolais heifers (Bos taurus) at pasture, in which two observers continuously videotaped social interactions and group departures after resting periods. These departures were preceded by a phase of preparation characterized by an increase in activity. The number of heifers participating to a movement increased with the number of group members oriented in the direction of the movement before departure. The first moving animal also recruited a higher number of mates when it had a greater number of close neighbours, the first individuals to follow being mainly its preferential partners. Coercive interactions such as pressing behaviours were observed within the 5 min preceding or following departure. After departure, the numbers of walks and restarts of the first two movers were still operative in recruiting others. The frequency of pauses of the first mover was significantly higher when it was not followed, meaning that it adjusted its behaviour to that of other group members. Decision-making was distributed among group members, with any individual being liable to move first. The behaviour of cows and their spatial distribution before departure, at departure and after departure significantly affected the number of participants in the movement, demonstrating that decisionmaking was time-distributed in the studied cattle group.

[1]  J. Black.  Preflight Signalling in Swans: A Mechanism for Group Cohesion and Flock Formation , 2010 .

[2]  B. Thierry,et al.  Individual and social determinants of spontaneous group movements in cattle and sheep. , 2009, Animal : an international journal of animal bioscience.

[3]  O. Petit,et al.  Patterns of group movements in juvenile domestic geese , 2009, Journal of Ethology.

[4]  B. Thierry,et al.  Decision making in group departures of sheep is a continuous process , 2009, Animal Behaviour.

[5]  Myriam Maumy,et al.  Decision-Making in Przewalski Horses (Equus ferus przewalskii) is Driven by the Ecological Contexts of Collective Movements , 2009 .

[6]  D. Helbing,et al.  Leadership, consensus decision making and collective behaviour in humans , 2009, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[7]  P. Ward,et al.  THE IMPORTANCE OF CERTAIN ASSEMBLAGES OF BIRDS AS “INFORMATION‐CENTRES” FOR FOOD‐FINDING , 2008 .

[8]  Iva Dostálková,et al.  Synchronization of behaviour in pairs: the role of communication and consequences in timing , 2007, Animal Behaviour.

[9]  Ilya R. Fischhoff,et al.  Social relationships and reproductive state influence leadership roles in movements of plains zebra, Equus burchellii , 2007, Animal Behaviour.

[10]  Bertrand Dumont,et al.  Consistency of animal order in spontaneous group movements allows the measurement of leadership in a group of grazing heifers , 2005 .

[11]  L. Conradt,et al.  Consensus decision making in animals. , 2005, Trends in ecology & evolution.

[12]  I. Couzin,et al.  Effective leadership and decision-making in animal groups on the move , 2005, Nature.

[13]  Robert Shield,et al.  Modeling the Effect of Leadership on Crowd Flow Dynamics , 2004, ACRI.

[14]  O. Petit,et al.  Distributed leadership in semifree-ranging white-faced capuchin monkeys , 2003, Animal Behaviour.

[15]  T. J. Roper,et al.  Group decision-making in animals , 2003, Nature.

[16]  A. Boissy,et al.  Interactions between social and feeding motivations on the grazing behaviour of herbivores: sheep more easily split into subgroups with familiar peers , 2002 .

[17]  Guy Theraulaz,et al.  Self-Organization in Biological Systems , 2001, Princeton studies in complexity.

[18]  S. Côté,et al.  Erratum to: Offspring sex ratio in relation to maternal age and social rank in mountain goats (Oreamnos americanus) , 2001, Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology.

[19]  Han de Vries,et al.  An improved test of linearity in dominance hierarchies containing unknown or tied relationships , 1995, Animal Behaviour.

[20]  Charlotte K. Hemelrijk,et al.  A matrix partial correlation test used in investigations of reciprocity and other social interaction patterns at group level , 1990 .

[21]  D. G. Raveling.  Preflight and Flight Behavior of Canada Geese , 1969 .

[22]  O. Petit,et al.  Decision-making in group departures of female domestic geese , 2009 .

[23]  J. Deneubourg,et al.  How many for dinner? Recruitment and monitoring by glances in capuchins , 2007, Primates.

[24]  S. Boinski.  Vocal Coordination of Troop Movement in Squirrel Monkeys (Saimiri oerstedi and S. sciureus) and White-Faced Capuchins (Cebus capucinus) , 1996 .

[25]  H. Prins,et al.  Ecology and Behaviour of the African Buffalo , 1996, Chapman & Hall Wildlife Ecology and Behaviour Series.

[26]  A. Harcourt,et al.  Gorillas' Vocalizations During Rest Periods: Signals of Impending Departure? , 1994 .

[27]  H. Vries,et al.  Matman : a program for the analysis of sociometric matrices and behavioural transition matrices , 1993 .

[28]  Viktor Reinhardt,et al.  MOVEMENT ORDERS AND LEADERSHIP IN A SEMI-WILD CATTLE HERD , 1983 .

[29]  V. Reinhardt,et al.  Cohesive Relationships in a Cattle Herd (Bos Indicus) , 1981 .

[30]  M. Bouissou,et al.  Etablissement Des Relations Preferentielles Chez Les Bovins Domestiques , 1978 .

[31]  J. Altmann,et al.  Observational study of behavior: sampling methods. , 1974, Behaviour.

[32]  H. Kummer,et al.  Social Organization Of Hamadryas Baboons , 1968 .