Transposed-letter priming of prelexical orthographic representations.

A prime generated by transposing two internal letters (e.g., jugde) produces strong priming of the original word (judge). In lexical decision, this transposed-letter (TL) priming effect is generally weak or absent for nonword targets; thus, it is unclear whether the origin of this effect is lexical or prelexical. The authors describe the Bayesian Reader theory of masked priming (D. Norris & S. Kinoshita, 2008), which explains why nonwords do not show priming in lexical decision but why they do in the cross-case same-different task. This analysis is followed by 3 experiments that show that priming in this task is not based on low-level perceptual similarity between the prime and target, or on phonology, to make the case that priming is based on prelexical orthographic representation. The authors then use this task to demonstrate equivalent TL priming effects for nonwords and words. The results are interpreted as the first reliable evidence based on the masked priming procedure that letter position is not coded absolutely within the prelexical, orthographic representation. The implications of the results for current letter position coding schemes are discussed.

[1]  David B. Boles,et al.  An upper- and lowercase alphabetic similarity matrix, with derived generation similarity values , 1989 .

[2]  Manuel Perea,et al.  Transposed-Letter Confusability Effects in Masked Form Priming , 2003 .

[3]  M Coltheart,et al.  Basic processes in reading: computation of abstract letter identities. , 1984, Canadian journal of psychology.

[4]  Sachiko Kinoshita,et al.  Masked priming : the state of the art , 2003 .

[5]  J Grainger,et al.  Orthographic processing in visual word recognition: a multiple read-out model. , 1996, Psychological review.

[6]  Manuel Perea,et al.  The overlap model: a model of letter position coding. , 2008, Psychological review.

[7]  James L. McClelland,et al.  An interactive activation model of context effects in letter perception: I. An account of basic findings. , 1981 .

[8]  Keith Rayner,et al.  Letter transpositions within and across morphemes. , 2005, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[9]  R W Proctor,et al.  Order-relevant and order-irrelevant decision rules in multiletter matching. , 1985, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[10]  Dennis Norris,et al.  The Bayesian reader: explaining word recognition as an optimal Bayesian decision process. , 2006, Psychological review.

[11]  Victoria A. Fromkin,et al.  Linguistics: The Cambridge Survey: The mental lexicon , 1988 .

[12]  Piers L. Cornelissen,et al.  Letter‐position encoding and dyslexia , 2005 .

[13]  Colin J. Davis,et al.  Factors underlying masked priming effects in competitive network models of visual word recognition , 2003 .

[14]  Manuel Perea,et al.  Transposed-letter effects: Consonants, vowels and letter frequency , 2008 .

[15]  Kenneth I. Forster,et al.  Masked form priming with extreme transposition , 2008 .

[16]  J. Bowers,et al.  Orthographic, phonological, and articulatory contributions to masked letter and word priming. , 1998, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[17]  B. Bergum,et al.  Attention and Performance VI , 1978 .

[18]  H. Marmurek,et al.  Familiarity effects and word unitization in visual comparison tasks , 1989, Memory & cognition.

[19]  Sachiko Kinoshita,et al.  Priming of Abstract Letter Identities in the Letter Match Task , 2008, Quarterly journal of experimental psychology.

[20]  Max Coltheart,et al.  Access to the internal lexicon , 1977 .

[21]  S. Lupker,et al.  Can CANISO activate CASINO? Transposed-letter similarity effects with nonadjacent letter positions ☆ , 2004 .

[22]  K. Forster,et al.  The mechanics of masked priming , 2003 .

[23]  James L. McClelland,et al.  An interactive activation model of context effects in letter perception: part 1.: an account of basic findings , 1988 .

[24]  R. Ratcliff.  A theory of order relations in perceptual matching. , 1981 .

[25]  Carol Whitney,et al.  SERIOL Reading , 2008 .

[26]  M Coltheart,et al.  DRC: a dual route cascaded model of visual word recognition and reading aloud. , 2001, Psychological review.

[27]  Jeffrey S Bowers,et al.  Contrasting five different theories of letter position coding: evidence from orthographic similarity effects. , 2006, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[28]  K. Forster,et al.  REPETITION PRIMING AND FREQUENCY ATTENUATION IN LEXICAL ACCESS , 1984 .

[29]  Jonathan Grainger,et al.  Modeling letter position coding in printed word perception , 2004 .

[30]  Dennis Norris,et al.  Perception as evidence accumulation and Bayesian inference: insights from masked priming. , 2008, Journal of experimental psychology. General.

[31]  Colin J. Davis,et al.  The self-organising lexical acquisition and recognition (SOLAR) model of visual word recognition. , 2001 .

[32]  Jonathan Grainger,et al.  A study of relative-position priming with superset primes. , 2006, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[33]  H. Kucera,et al.  Computational analysis of present-day American English , 1967 .

[34]  Dennis Norris,et al.  A stimulus sampling theory of letter identity and order , 2010 .

[35]  Carol Whitney,et al.  Comparison of the SERIOL and SOLAR theories of letter-position encoding , 2008, Brain and Language.

[36]  Robert W. Proctor,et al.  A unified theory for matching-task phenomena. , 1981 .

[37]  K I Forster,et al.  Evidence for lexical access in a simultaneous matching task , 1975, Memory & cognition.

[38]  L. Rips,et al.  Order information in multiple-element comparison. , 1982, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[39]  J. Grainger,et al.  Letter position coding in printed word perception: Effects of repeated and transposed letters , 2004 .

[40]  Kenneth I Forster,et al.  DMDX: A Windows display program with millisecond accuracy , 2003, Behavior research methods, instruments, & computers : a journal of the Psychonomic Society, Inc.

[41]  Manuel Perea,et al.  Do orthotactics and phonology constrain the transposed-letter effect? , 2008 .

[42]  C. Whitney.  How the brain encodes the order of letters in a printed word: The SERIOL model and selective literature review , 2001, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[43]  L. Rips,et al.  Order information in multiple-element comparison , 1982 .

[44]  K. Forster,et al.  Masked priming with graphemically related forms: Repetition or partial activation? , 1987 .

[45]  Manuel Perea,et al.  Transposed-letter effects in reading: evidence from eye movements and parafoveal preview. , 2007, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[46]  Jonathan Grainger,et al.  Letter position information and printed word perception: the relative-position priming constraint. , 2006, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[47]  Chris Davis,et al.  The role of neighbourhood density in transposed-letter priming , 2009 .