Convex Relaxations of Optimal Power Flow Problems: An Illustrative Example

Recently, there has been significant interest in convex relaxations of the optimal power flow (OPF) problem. A semidefinite programming (SDP) relaxation globally solves many OPF problems. However, there exist practical problems for which the SDP relaxation fails to yield the global solution. Conditions for the success or failure of the SDP relaxation are valuable for determining whether the relaxation is appropriate for a given OPF problem. To move beyond existing conditions, which only apply to a limited class of problems, a typical conjecture is that failure of the SDP relaxation can be related to physical characteristics of the system. By presenting an example OPF problem with two equivalent formulations, this paper demonstrates that physically based conditions cannot universally explain algorithm behavior. The SDP relaxation fails for one formulation but succeeds in finding the global solution to the other formulation. Since these formulations represent the same system, success (or otherwise) of the SDP relaxation must involve factors beyond just the network physics. The lack of universal physical conditions for success of the SDP relaxation motivates the development of tighter convex relaxations capable of solving a broader class of problems. Tools from polynomial optimization theory provide a means of developing tighter relaxations. This paper uses the example problem to illustrate relaxations from the Lasserre hierarchy for polynomial optimization and a related “mixed semidefinite/second-order cone programming” hierarchy.

[1]  R. Adapa,et al.  A review of selected optimal power flow literature to 1993. I. Nonlinear and quadratic programming approaches , 1999 .

[2]  Francisco D. Galiana,et al.  A survey of the optimal power flow literature , 1991 .

[3]  R. Belmans,et al.  A literature survey of Optimal Power Flow problems in the electricity market context , 2009, 2009 IEEE/PES Power Systems Conference and Exposition.

[4]  Pascal Van Hentenryck,et al.  Network flow and copper plate relaxations for AC transmission systems , 2015, 2016 Power Systems Computation Conference (PSCC).

[5]  Daniel K. Molzahn,et al.  Examining the limits of the application of semidefinite programming to power flow problems , 2011, 2011 49th Annual Allerton Conference on Communication, Control, and Computing (Allerton).

[6]  Ian A. Hiskens,et al.  Moment-based relaxation of the optimal power flow problem , 2013, 2014 Power Systems Computation Conference.

[7]  L. Ni,et al.  Parallel processing for the load flow of power systems: the approach and applications , 1989, Proceedings of the 28th IEEE Conference on Decision and Control,.

[8]  Ian A. Hiskens,et al.  Solution of optimal power flow problems using moment relaxations augmented with objective function penalization , 2015, 2015 54th IEEE Conference on Decision and Control (CDC).

[9]  Ian A. Hiskens,et al.  Sparsity-Exploiting Moment-Based Relaxations of the Optimal Power Flow Problem , 2014, IEEE Transactions on Power Systems.

[10]  S. Oren,et al.  Bound Tightening for the Alternating Current Optimal Power Flow Problem , 2016, IEEE Transactions on Power Systems.

[11]  I. Hiskens,et al.  Convexity of the set of feasible injections and revenue adequacy in FTR markets , 2005, IEEE Transactions on Power Systems.

[12]  Pascal Van Hentenryck,et al.  The QC Relaxation: Theoretical and Computational Results on Optimal Power Flow , 2015, ArXiv.

[13]  Javad Lavaei,et al.  Convex Relaxation for Optimal Power Flow Problem: Mesh Networks , 2015, IEEE Transactions on Power Systems.

[14]  Jesse T. Holzer,et al.  Implementation of a Large-Scale Optimal Power Flow Solver Based on Semidefinite Programming , 2013, IEEE Transactions on Power Systems.

[15]  Steven H. Low,et al.  Convex Relaxation of Optimal Power Flow—Part I: Formulations and Equivalence , 2014, IEEE Transactions on Control of Network Systems.

[16]  Paul A. Trodden,et al.  Local Solutions of the Optimal Power Flow Problem , 2013, IEEE Transactions on Power Systems.

[17]  Carleton Coffrin,et al.  The QC Relaxation: A Theoretical and Computational Study on Optimal Power Flow , 2017, IEEE Transactions on Power Systems.

[18]  Santanu S. Dey,et al.  Strong SOCP Relaxations for the Optimal Power Flow Problem , 2015, Oper. Res..

[19]  Pascal Van Hentenryck,et al.  Strengthening Convex Relaxations with Bound Tightening for Power Network Optimization , 2015, CP.

[20]  R D Zimmerman,et al.  MATPOWER: Steady-State Operations, Planning, and Analysis Tools for Power Systems Research and Education , 2011, IEEE Transactions on Power Systems.

[21]  Daniel K. Molzahn,et al.  A Sufficient Condition for Global Optimality of Solutions to the Optimal Power Flow Problem , 2014, IEEE Transactions on Power Systems.

[22]  Jean Charles Gilbert,et al.  Application of the Moment-SOS Approach to Global Optimization of the OPF Problem , 2013, IEEE Transactions on Power Systems.

[23]  K. Fujisawa,et al.  Semidefinite programming for optimal power flow problems , 2008 .

[24]  Daniel K. Molzahn,et al.  Moment/Sum-of-Squares Hierarchy for Complex Polynomial Optimization , 2015, 1508.02068.

[25]  S. Low,et al.  Zero Duality Gap in Optimal Power Flow Problem , 2012, IEEE Transactions on Power Systems.

[26]  J. Gallier Quadratic Optimization Problems , 2020, Linear Algebra and Optimization with Applications to Machine Learning.

[27]  Daniel Bienstock,et al.  On linear relaxations of OPF problems , 2014, 1411.1120.

[28]  J. Lasserre Moments, Positive Polynomials And Their Applications , 2009 .

[29]  Sairaj V. Dhople,et al.  Regulation of dynamical systems to optimal solutions of semidefinite programs: Algorithms and applications to AC optimal power flow , 2015, 2015 American Control Conference (ACC).

[30]  Ian A. Hiskens,et al.  Mixed SDP/SOCP moment relaxations of the optimal power flow problem , 2015, 2015 IEEE Eindhoven PowerTech.

[31]  H Lee Willis,et al.  Power distribution planning reference book , 2000 .

[32]  Masakazu Muramatsu,et al.  Sums of Squares and Semidefinite Programming Relaxations for Polynomial Optimization Problems with Structured Sparsity , 2004 .

[33]  Santanu S. Dey,et al.  Inexactness of SDP Relaxation and Valid Inequalities for Optimal Power Flow , 2014, IEEE Transactions on Power Systems.

[34]  Ian A. Hiskens,et al.  Semidefinite relaxations of equivalent optimal power flow problems: An illustrative example , 2015, 2015 IEEE International Symposium on Circuits and Systems (ISCAS).

[35]  A. Grothey,et al.  Local Solutions of Optimal Power Flow , 2013 .

[36]  Jakub Marecek,et al.  Optimal Power Flow as a Polynomial Optimization Problem , 2014, IEEE Transactions on Power Systems.

[37]  Martin S. Andersen,et al.  Reduced-Complexity Semidefinite Relaxations of Optimal Power Flow Problems , 2013, IEEE Transactions on Power Systems.

[38]  Georgios B. Giannakis,et al.  Distributed Optimal Power Flow for Smart Microgrids , 2012, IEEE Transactions on Smart Grid.

[39]  I. Hiskens,et al.  Exploring the Power Flow Solution Space Boundary , 2001, IEEE Power Engineering Review.

[40]  Alan C. Liddell,et al.  Hybrid Methods in Solving Alternating-Current Optimal Power Flows , 2015, IEEE Transactions on Smart Grid.

[41]  Steven H. Low,et al.  Convex relaxations and linear approximation for optimal power flow in multiphase radial networks , 2014, 2014 Power Systems Computation Conference.

[42]  R. Jabr Exploiting Sparsity in SDP Relaxations of the OPF Problem , 2012, IEEE Transactions on Power Systems.

[43]  S. Deckmann,et al.  Numerical Testing of Power System Load Flow Equivalents , 1980, IEEE Transactions on Power Apparatus and Systems.

[44]  Javad Lavaei,et al.  ADMM for sparse semidefinite programming with applications to optimal power flow problem , 2015, 2015 54th IEEE Conference on Decision and Control (CDC).

[45]  Jakub Marecek,et al.  A low-rank coordinate-descent algorithm for semidefinite programming relaxations of optimal power flow , 2015, Optim. Methods Softw..

[46]  S. Deckmann,et al.  Studies on Power System Load Flow Equivalencing , 1980, IEEE Transactions on Power Apparatus and Systems.