Synapse proteomics of multiprotein complexes: en route from genes to nervous system diseases.

Proteomic experiments have produced a draft profile of the overall molecular composition of the mammalian neuronal synapse. It appears that synapses have over 1000 protein components and the mapping of their interactions, organization and functions will lead to a global view of the role of synapses in physiology and disease. A major functional subcomponent of the synaptic machinery is a multiprotein complex of glutamate receptors and adhesion proteins with associated adaptor and signalling enzymes totally 185 proteins known as the N-methyl-d-aspartate receptor complex/MAGUK associated signalling complex (NRC/MASC). Here, we review the proteomic studies and functions of NRC/MASC and specifically report on the role of its component genes in human diseases. Using a systematic literature search protocol, we identified reports of mutations or polymorphisms in 47 genes associated with 183 disorders, of which 54 were nervous system disorders. A similar number of genes are important in mouse synaptic plasticity and behaviour, where the NRC/MASC acts as a signalling complex with multiple functions provided by its individual protein components and their interactions. The individual gene mutations suggest not only an important role for the NRC/MASC in human diseases but that these diseases may be functionally connected by their common link to the NRC/MASC. The NRC/MASC is a rich source of genetic variation and provides a platform for understanding relationships of disease phenotype amenable to systematic studies such as the Genes to Cognition research consortium (www.genes2cognition.org) that links human and mouse genetics with proteomic studies.

[1]  Philip R. Gafken,et al.  Proteomic analysis of native metabotropic glutamate receptor 5 protein complexes reveals novel molecular constituents , 2004, Journal of neurochemistry.

[2]  S. Grant,et al.  Proteomic analysis of NMDA receptor–adhesion protein signaling complexes , 2000, Nature Neuroscience.

[3]  S. Grant,et al.  Proteomics in postgenomic neuroscience: the end of the beginning , 2004, Nature Neuroscience.

[4]  T. Yagi,et al.  Reduced hippocampal LTP and spatial learning in mice lacking NMDA receptor ε1 subunit , 1995, Nature.

[5]  S. J. Martin,et al.  SynGAP Regulates ERK/MAPK Signaling, Synaptic Plasticity, and Learning in the Complex with Postsynaptic Density 95 and NMDA Receptor , 2002, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[6]  P. Kind,et al.  Differential expression of two NMDA receptor interacting proteins, PSD‐95 and SynGAP during mouse development , 2005, The European journal of neuroscience.

[7]  Christian Blaschke,et al.  Text Mining for Metabolic Pathways, Signaling Cascades, and Protein Networks , 2005, Science's STKE.

[8]  Richard F. Thompson,et al.  Importance of the Intracellular Domain of NR2 Subunits for NMDA Receptor Function In Vivo , 1998, Cell.

[9]  S. Grant,et al.  The Organization and Integrative Function of the Post-Synaptic Proteome , 2003 .

[10]  S. Grant,et al.  Molecular characterization and comparison of the components and multiprotein complexes in the postsynaptic proteome , 2006, Journal of neurochemistry.

[11]  R. Morris,et al.  Enhanced long-term potentiation and impaired learning in mice with mutant postsynaptic density-95 protein , 1998, Nature.

[12]  M. Mayer,et al.  Structure and function of glutamate receptor ion channels. , 2004, Annual review of physiology.

[13]  M. Sheng,et al.  PDZ domain proteins of synapses , 2004, Nature Reviews Neuroscience.

[14]  Holger Husi,et al.  Proteomics of the nervous system , 2001, Trends in Neurosciences.

[15]  S. Grant,et al.  Neuropathic Sensitization of Behavioral Reflexes and Spinal NMDA Receptor/CaM Kinase II Interactions Are Disrupted in PSD-95 Mutant Mice , 2003, Current Biology.

[16]  D. Geschwind,et al.  Progress in Realizing the Promise of Microarrays in Systems Neurobiology , 2005, Neuron.