Analog quantum computing (AQC) and the need for time-symmetric physics

This paper discusses what will be necessary to achieve the full potential capabilities of analog quantum computing (AQC), which is defined here as the enrichment of continuous-variable computing to include stochastic, nonunitary circuit elements such as dissipative spin gates and address the wider range of tasks emerging from new trends in engineering, such as approximation of stochastic maps, ghost imaging and new forms of neural networks and intelligent control. This paper focuses especially on what is needed in terms of new experiments to validate remarkable new results in the modeling of triple entanglement, and in creating a pathway which links fundamental theoretical work with hard core experimental work, on a pathway to AQC similar to the pathway to digital quantum computing already blazed by Zeilinger’s group. It discusses the most recent experiments and reviews two families of alternative models based on the traditional eigenvector projection model of polarizers and on a new family of local realistic models based on Markov Random Fields across space–time adhering to the rules of time-symmetric physics. For both families, it reviews lumped parameter versions, continuous time extension and possibilities for extension to continuous space and time.

[1]  Gwilym M. Jenkins,et al.  Time series analysis, forecasting and control , 1971 .

[2]  A. Shimony,et al.  Bell's theorem. Experimental tests and implications , 1978 .

[3]  R. Landauer,et al.  The Fundamental Physical Limits of Computation. , 1985 .

[4]  D. Deutsch Quantum theory, the Church–Turing principle and the universal quantum computer , 1985, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. A. Mathematical and Physical Sciences.

[5]  Andrew R. Barron,et al.  Universal approximation bounds for superpositions of a sigmoidal function , 1993, IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory.

[6]  Hava T. Siegelmann,et al.  On the Computational Power of Neural Nets , 1995, J. Comput. Syst. Sci..

[7]  Shih,et al.  Optical imaging by means of two-photon quantum entanglement. , 1995, Physical review. A, Atomic, molecular, and optical physics.

[8]  M. S. Zubairy,et al.  Quantum optics: Quantum theory of the laser – density operator approach , 1997 .

[9]  N. Karoui,et al.  Backward Stochastic Differential Equations , 1997 .

[10]  N. Gershenfeld,et al.  Bulk Spin-Resonance Quantum Computation , 1997, Science.

[11]  S. Braunstein,et al.  Quantum computation over continuous variables , 1998 .

[12]  H. Carmichael Statistical Methods in Quantum Optics 1 , 1999 .

[13]  H. Weinfurter,et al.  Observation of three-photon Greenberger-Horne-Zeilinger entanglement , 1998, quant-ph/9810035.

[14]  S. Datta Nanoscale device modeling: the Green’s function method , 2000 .

[15]  M. Scully,et al.  Statistical Methods in Quantum Optics 1: Master Equations and Fokker-Planck Equations , 2003 .

[16]  Pedram Khalili Amiri,et al.  Quantum computers , 2003 .

[17]  G. Stegeman,et al.  Observation of three-photon enhanced four-photon absorption. , 2003, Physical review letters.

[18]  Mark S. Johnson,et al.  Spin electronics , 2003, SPIE OPTO.

[19]  Wayne C. Myrvold,et al.  Bell’s Theorem , 2011 .

[20]  E. Tosatti,et al.  Optimization using quantum mechanics: quantum annealing through adiabatic evolution , 2006 .

[21]  H. Carmichael Statistical Methods in Quantum Optics 2: Non-Classical Fields , 2007 .

[22]  P. Werbos Bell’s Theorem, Many Worlds and Backwards-Time Physics: Not Just a Matter of Interpretation , 2008, 0801.1234.

[23]  Paul J. Werbos,et al.  2009 Special Issue: Intelligence in the brain: A theory of how it works and how to build it , 2009 .

[24]  Yasunobu Nakamura,et al.  Quantum computers , 2010, Nature.

[25]  W. Munro,et al.  Quantum analogue computing , 2010, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences.

[26]  Todd A. Brun,et al.  Quantum Computing , 2011, Computer Science, The Hardware, Software and Heart of It.

[27]  Maira Amezcua,et al.  Quantum Optics , 2012 .

[28]  Paul J. Werbos,et al.  Memristors for More Than Just Memory: How to Use Learning to Expand Applications , 2012 .

[29]  E. Waks,et al.  Low-photon-number optical switching with a single quantum dot coupled to a photonic crystal cavity. , 2012, Physical review letters.

[30]  P. Werbos Extension of the Glauber-Sudarshan Mapping For Classical and Quantum Energy Spectra , 2013, 1402.5116.

[31]  N. Yu,et al.  Ghost Imaging of Space Objects , 2013 .

[32]  Frank L. Lewis,et al.  Reinforcement Learning and Approximate Dynamic Programming (RLADP)Â -Â Foundations, Common Misconceptions, and the Challenges Ahead , 2013 .

[33]  Pramode K. Verma,et al.  The braided single-stage protocol for quantum secure communication , 2014, Sensing Technologies + Applications.

[34]  Paul J. Werbos,et al.  Example of lumped parameter modeling of a quantum optics circuit , 2013, Sensing Technologies + Applications.

[35]  P. Werbos Local Realistic Model of Bell Theorem Experiment and Alternative Model of Quantum Measurement , 2014, 1403.0469.

[36]  M. Scully,et al.  Delayed-choice quantum eraser with thermal light. , 2014, Physical review letters.

[37]  Paul J. Werbos,et al.  From ADP to the brain: Foundations, roadmap, challenges and research priorities , 2014, 2014 International Joint Conference on Neural Networks (IJCNN).

[38]  Mehmet A. Orgun,et al.  Dual compressible hybrid quantum secret sharing schemes based on extended unitary operations , 2014, Sensing Technologies + Applications.

[39]  Paul J. Werbos,et al.  Time-Symmetric Physics: A Radical Approach to the Decoherence Problem , 2014, ArXiv.

[40]  Paul J. Werbos,et al.  Stochastic Path Model of Polaroid Polarizer for Bell's Theorem and Triphoton Experiments , 2014, Int. J. Bifurc. Chaos.