Post‐treatment of UASB reactor effluent by coagulation and flocculation process

Exploratory experiments were performed to test the feasibility of coagulation and flocculation as a post-treatment process for the effluent of an Upflow Anaerobic Sludge Blanket (UASB) reactor treating domestic sewage. Commonly used coagulants [alum, polyaluminium chloride (PAC), ferric chloride, and ferric sulphate] were utilized in a series of jar tests to determine the optimum coagulant dose. The total and fecal coliforms in the effluent were less than 100,000 MPN/100 mL and 10,000 MPN/100 mL, respectively. It was found that all the tested coagulants were effective in reducing the effluent BOD and SS to less than 20 mg/L and 50 mg/L, respectively. The optimum chemical dosage was 20 mg/L (as Al) for alum 24 mg/L (as Al) for PAC, and 39.6 mg/L (as Fe) for FeCl3 and 17.6 mg/L (as Fe) for FeSO4, respectively. Coagulation–flocculation alone was not sufficient to reduce the fecal coliforms concentration to a permissible limit (1000 MPN/100 mL) for unrestricted irrigation. Thus, it would be necessary to disinfect the coagulated effluent. It was found out that after coagulation, a chlorine dose of 1–2 mg/L can reduce the fecal coliforms to less than 1000 MPN/100 mL. © 2007 American Institute of Chemical Engineers Environ Prog, 2007.

[1]  M. Reali,et al.  Ozonation followed by coagulation/flocculation and flotation as post-treatment of the effluent from an anaerobic baffled reactor treating domestic sewage. , 2001, Water science and technology : a journal of the International Association on Water Pollution Research.

[2]  R. Gonçalves,et al.  Pathogen removal efficiency from UASB + BF effluent using conventional and UV post-treatment systems. , 2004, Water science and technology : a journal of the International Association on Water Pollution Research.

[3]  J. Rubio,et al.  Treatment of municipal wastewater UASB reactor effluent by unconventional flotation and UV disinfection. , 2005, Water science and technology : a journal of the International Association on Water Pollution Research.

[4]  Gideon Oron,et al.  Post-treatment of UASB reactor effluent in an integrated duckweed and stabilization pond system , 1999 .

[5]  P. Pearce,et al.  The application of potassium ferrate for sewage treatment. , 2006, Journal of environmental management.

[6]  G Lettinga,et al.  Treatment of domestic sewage in a combined UASB/RBC system. Process optimization for irrigation purposes. , 2003, Water science and technology : a journal of the International Association on Water Pollution Research.

[7]  Hideki Harada,et al.  Potential of a Combination of UASB and DHS Reactor as a Novel Sewage Treatment System for Developing Countries: Long-Term Evaluation , 2006 .

[8]  M Tandukar,et al.  A low-cost municipal sewage treatment system with a combination of UASB and the "fourth-generation" downflow hanging sponge reactors. , 2005, Water science and technology : a journal of the International Association on Water Pollution Research.

[9]  E. Diamadopoulos,et al.  Coagulation-filtration of a secondary effluent by means of pre-hydrolyzed coagulants , 1996 .

[10]  J. Sáez,et al.  Improvement of coagulation-flocculation process using anionic polyacrylamide as coagulant aid. , 2005, Chemosphere.

[11]  A. E. Greenberg,et al.  Standard methods for the examination of water and wastewater : supplement to the sixteenth edition , 1988 .

[12]  B. Gao,et al.  Evaluation of aluminum-silicate polymer composite as a coagulant for water treatment. , 2002, Water research.

[13]  Daniel W. Smith,et al.  Batch coagulation of a lagoon for fecal coliform reductions , 1986 .