A comparative study of two fast nonlinear free‐surface water wave models

This paper presents a comparison in terms of accuracy and efficiency between two fully nonlinear potential flow solvers for the solution of gravity wave propagation. One model is based on the high-order spectral (HOS) method, whereas the second model is the high-order finite difference model OceanWave3D. Although both models solve the nonlinear potential flow problem, they make use of two different approaches. The HOS model uses a modal expansion in the vertical direction to collapse the numerical solution to the two-dimensional horizontal plane. On the other hand, the finite difference model simply directly solves the three-dimensional problem. Both models have been well validated on standard test cases and shown to exhibit attractive convergence properties and an optimal scaling of the computational effort with increasing problem size. These two models are compared for solution of a typical problem: propagation of highly nonlinear periodic waves on a finite constant-depth domain. The HOS model is found to be more efficient than OceanWave3D with a difference dependent on the level of accuracy needed as well as the wave steepness. Also, the higher the order of the finite difference schemes used in OceanWave3D, the closer the results come to the HOS model.

[1]  Pierre Ferrant,et al.  3-D HOS simulations of extreme waves in open seas , 2007 .

[2]  N. S. Asaithambi Computational of free-surface flows , 1987 .

[3]  C. A. Fleming,et al.  A three dimensional multigrid model for fully nonlinear water waves , 1997 .

[4]  John D. Fenton,et al.  A Fourier approximation method for steady water waves , 1981, Journal of Fluid Mechanics.

[5]  Ho-Hwan Chun,et al.  Fully nonlinear numerical wave tank (NWT) simulations and wave run-up prediction around 3-D structures , 2003 .

[6]  Robert T. Hudspeth,et al.  Irregular points in 2-D free surface flows with surface tension for the wavemaker boundary value problem , 1996 .

[7]  John Grue,et al.  An efficient model for three-dimensional surface wave simulations , 2005 .

[8]  Pierre Ferrant,et al.  Implementation and Validation of Nonlinear Wave Maker Models in a HOS Numerical Wave Tank , 2006 .

[9]  Bruce J. West,et al.  A new numerical method for surface hydrodynamics , 1987 .

[10]  David Le Touzé,et al.  TIME DOMAIN SIMULATION OF NONLINEAR WATER WAVES USING SPECTRAL METHODS , 2010 .

[11]  Jaak Monbaliu,et al.  Development of a bimodal structure in ocean wave spectra , 2010 .

[12]  Vladimir E. Zakharov,et al.  Stability of periodic waves of finite amplitude on the surface of a deep fluid , 1968 .

[13]  Harry B. Bingham,et al.  An efficient flexible-order model for 3D nonlinear water waves , 2009, J. Comput. Phys..

[14]  Bengt Fornberg,et al.  A practical guide to pseudospectral methods: Introduction , 1996 .

[15]  David Le Touzé,et al.  A modified High-Order Spectral method for wavemaker modeling in a numerical wave tank , 2012 .

[16]  Nonlinear evolution of the modulational instability under weak forcing and damping , 2010 .

[17]  Harry B. Bingham,et al.  On the accuracy of finite-difference solutions for nonlinear water waves , 2007 .

[18]  Mitsuhiro Tanaka Verification of Hasselmann's energy transfer among surface gravity waves by direct numerical simulations of primitive equations , 2001, Journal of Fluid Mechanics.

[19]  Qingwei Ma,et al.  Advances in Numerical Simulation of Nonlinear Water Waves , 2010 .

[20]  Dick K. P. Yue,et al.  A high-order spectral method for the study of nonlinear gravity waves , 1987, Journal of Fluid Mechanics.