Design and Feasibility Verification of a Knee Assistive Exoskeleton System for Construction Workers

Robotic-powered exoskeletons and body joint-adapted assistive units are currently under development for the enhancement of human locomotor performance in the military, in industries, and in patients and the elderly with mobility impairments [1]. They free people from much labor and the burdens of many kinds of manual work. For example, when it comes to automation in the industrial field, factory automation has made good progress. Operators (humans) can be included in a conventional manufacturing process with respect to a formal production line and uniform working conditions. Automation outside the production line, however, especially in common manufacturing stages, has several limitations and difficulties in adapting to actual conditions because the industrial field has but a small part in the process due to its operating characteristics. There have been many approaches to the reduction of labor that do not only fully assist but also partly aid workers, such as in the use of extremely heavy payload-oriented construction equipment, which are manipulated by humans. Manual or semi-automatic machine tools are mostly used in contemporary industries. In particular, without manpower, especially without the manipulability and mobility of the upper and lower human limbs, full automation will be incompatible with today’s technologies [2]. Exoskeletons have strong advantages given their unique features such as their outstanding physical performance, exceeding that of humans, and their agility, which is utilized by operators’ nerve systems. As a result, attempts to adopt exoskeletons in the industrial field, especially at construction sites, indicate the use of feasible approaches to factory automation. The strategy and support method for exoskeletons that amplify human muscle power can be divided into four main categories: (1) exoskeletons that totally alternate with both the upper and lower parts of the muscle power system, (2) assist the all extremities not alternate (here, assist means the human share the load with the exoskeleton and alternate means the human just input operation command using his own motion into exoskeleton system and it totally handles the load), (3) alternate with the part of all extremities (4) assist the part of all extremities of muscle power system. The first type of exoskeleton which alternates with the entire muscle power still has many limitations, as with its size and electric power supply. Due to these constraints, exoskeletons are usually bulky and cannot freely move out of the range of the power source line. One of the representative studies of the second type which assists the whole body is the HAL series.

[1]  J C Goh,et al.  A cadaver study of the function of the oblique part of vastus medialis. , 1995, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. British volume.

[2]  L. Jensen Knee osteoarthritis: influence of work involving heavy lifting, kneeling, climbing stairs or ladders, or kneeling/squatting combined with heavy lifting , 2007, Occupational and Environmental Medicine.

[3]  H Brenner,et al.  Construction work and risk of occupational disability: a ten year follow up of 14 474 male workers , 2005, Occupational and Environmental Medicine.

[4]  H. Ranu,et al.  Therapeutic Exercise: Foundations and Techniques. 2nd Edn , 1992 .

[5]  Carlos Balaguer,et al.  Robotics and Automation in Construction , 2008 .

[6]  H. R. Lissner,et al.  Biomechanics Of Human Motion , 1962 .

[7]  Meredith Thring,et al.  Robots and Telechirs , 1983 .

[8]  Farzam Farahmand,et al.  Quantitative study of the quadriceps muscles and trochlear groove geometry related to instability of the patellofemoral joint , 1998, Journal of orthopaedic research : official publication of the Orthopaedic Research Society.

[9]  S. Paluska,et al.  Knee braces: current evidence and clinical recommendations for their use. , 2000, American family physician.

[10]  J. A. Simpson,et al.  MUSCLES—TESTING AND FUNCTION , 1973 .

[11]  J. Perry,et al.  Quadriceps function. An anatomical and mechanical study using amputated limbs. , 1968, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume.

[12]  Adam Zoss,et al.  On the Biomimetic Design of the Berkeley Lower Extremity Exoskeleton (BLEEX) , 2005, Proceedings of the 2005 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation.

[13]  Maria Q Feng Sensor Suits for Human Motion Detection , 2006 .

[14]  Laura K. Smith,et al.  Biomechanics of Human Motion , 1963 .

[15]  V. Edgerton,et al.  Muscle architecture of the human lower limb. , 1983, Clinical orthopaedics and related research.

[16]  Haoyong Yu,et al.  Development of NTU wearable exoskeleton system for assistive technologies , 2005, IEEE International Conference Mechatronics and Automation, 2005.

[17]  Margareta Nordin,et al.  Basic Biomechanics of the Musculoskeletal Systm , 1989 .

[18]  M. Bryce Muscles Alive: Their Functions Revealed by Electromyography , 1963 .

[19]  Shyamal Patel,et al.  Design, Control and Human Testing of an Active Knee Rehabilitation Orthotic Device , 2007, Proceedings 2007 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation.