Fluorescence photography in the evaluation of acne.

BACKGROUND Quantification of acne remains a challenge. It may be difficult to identify lesions by standard flash photography. Previous studies have shown that foci of light in fluorescence photographs correspond to high protoporphyrin IX production by Propionibacterium acnes in open comedones, follicles, and inflammatory lesions. OBJECTIVE Our purpose was to study the utility of fluorescence photography for evaluation of acne. METHODS Forty subjects with mild to moderate acne vulgaris were randomly selected to apply either clindamycin 1% topical solution or vehicle twice daily. Counts of acne lesions and flash and fluorescence photographs were obtained at baseline, and at 4, 8, and 12 weeks. RESULTS At 12 weeks, the treatment group had a larger percentage change in open comedones, less fluorescence in all areas assessed, and a larger percent decrease in fluorescence than the vehicle group. CONCLUSION Fluorescence photography appears to be a useful tool to chart the course of acne treatment.

[1]  J. Guin,et al.  Comedonal levels of free clindamycin following topical treatment with a 1% solution of clindamycin phosphate. , 1982, Journal of the American Academy of Dermatology.

[2]  C. Darley,et al.  Assessing inflammatory acne vulgaris‐correlation between clinical and photographic methods , 1984, The British journal of dermatology.

[3]  J. Samuelson.  An accurate photographic method for grading acne: initial use in a double-blind clinical comparison of minocycline and tetracycline. , 1985, Journal of the American Academy of Dermatology.

[4]  Braathen Lr.  Topical clindamycin versus oral tetracycline and placebo in acne vulgaris. , 1984 .

[5]  J. Leyden,et al.  Propionibacterium levels in patients with and without acne vulgaris. , 1975, The Journal of investigative dermatology.

[6]  G. Koch,et al.  The Application of the Principle of Intention–to–Treat to the Analysis of Clinical Trials , 1991 .

[7]  W. Cunliffe,et al.  Topical antibiotics for the treatment of acne vulgaris: A critical evaluation of the literature on their clinical benefit and comparative efficacy , 1990 .

[8]  C. Cornelius,et al.  Red fluorescence of comedones: production of porphyrins by Corynebacterium acnes. , 1967, The Journal of investigative dermatology.

[9]  L. Prutkin.  An ultrastructure study of the experimental keratoacanthoma. , 1967, The Journal of investigative dermatology.

[10]  R. Rietschel,et al.  Clindamycin Phosphate Used in Combination with Tretinoin in the Treatment of Acne , 1983, International journal of dermatology.

[11]  S. E. Michaels,et al.  An Acne Grading Method Using Photographic Standards , 1979 .

[12]  R. Stoughton,et al.  Topically applied antibiotics in acne vulgaris: clinical response and suppression of Corynebacterium acnes in open comedones. , 1976, Archives of dermatology.

[13]  J. Guin,et al.  Penetration of topical clindamycin into comedones. , 1980, Journal of the American Academy of Dermatology.

[14]  Stanton A. Glantz,et al.  Primer of biostatistics : statistical software program version 6.0 , 1981 .

[15]  R. Anderson.  Polarized light examination and photography of the skin. , 1991, Archives of dermatology.

[16]  W. Lee,et al.  Comparative studies of porphyrin production in Propionibacterium acnes and Propionibacterium granulosum , 1978, Journal of bacteriology.

[17]  J. Leyden,et al.  Facial follicular porphyrin fluorescence: correlation with age and density of Propionibacterium acnes , 1980, The British journal of dermatology.

[18]  J. G. Smith,et al.  Various parameters for grading acne vulgaris. , 1982, Archives of dermatology.

[19]  W. Cunliffe,et al.  The assessment of acne vulgaris—the Leeds technique , 1984, The British journal of dermatology.

[20]  J. E. Sebben.  Office photography from the surgical viewpoint. , 1983, The Journal of dermatologic surgery and oncology.

[21]  P. Pochi,et al.  Topical clindamycin therapy for acne vulgaris. A cooperative clinical study. , 1981, Archives of dermatology.