Planning and drawing complex shapes

Arm and hand movements are generally controlled using a combination of sensory-based and memory-based guidance mechanisms. This study examined similarities and differences in visually-guided and memory-guided arm movements, and sought to determine as to what extent certain control principles apply to each type of movement. In particular, the 2/3 power law is a principle that appears to govern the formation of complex, curved hand trajectories; it specifies that the tangential velocity should be proportional to the radius of curvature raised to an exponent of 1/3. A virtual reality system was used to project complex target paths in three-dimensional (3D) space. Human subjects first tracked (with the tip of a handheld pen) a single target moving along an unseen path. The entire target path then became visible and the subject traced the shape. Finally, the target shape disappeared and the subject was to draw it, in the same 3D space, from memory. Most aspects of the movements (speed, path size, shape and arm postures) were very similar across the three conditions. However, subjects adhered to the 2/3 power law most closely in the tracing condition, when the entire target path was visible. Also, only within the tracing condition, there were significant differences in the value of the exponent depending on the size and the spatial orientation of the trajectory. In the tracking and drawing conditions, the exponent was greater than 1/3, indicating that subjects spent more time in areas of tight curvature. This may represent a strategy for learning and remembering the complex shape.

[1]  S. Schaal,et al.  Origins and violations of the 2/3 power law in rhythmic three-dimensional arm movements , 2000, Experimental Brain Research.

[2]  F. Lacquaniti,et al.  Short-Term Memory for Reaching to Visual Targets: Psychophysical Evidence for Body-Centered Reference Frames , 1998, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[3]  Mary D Klein Breteler,et al.  Drawing sequences of segments in 3D: kinetic influences on arm configuration. , 2003, Journal of neurophysiology.

[4]  Jan M Hondzinski,et al.  Using arm configuration to learn the effects of gyroscopes and other devices. , 2003, Journal of neurophysiology.

[5]  J. Hollerbach An oscillation theory of handwriting , 2004, Biological Cybernetics.

[6]  R. Johansson,et al.  Eye–Hand Coordination in Object Manipulation , 2001, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[7]  Richard A. Andersen,et al.  Sensorimotor transformation during eye movements to remembered visual targets , 1991, Vision Research.

[8]  J. F. Soechting,et al.  The Duncker illusion and eye-hand coordination. , 2001, Journal of neurophysiology.

[9]  P. Viviani,et al.  The law relating the kinematic and figural aspects of drawing movements. , 1983, Acta psychologica.

[10]  J. F. Soechting,et al.  Transformation from Head- to Shoulder-Centered Representation of Target Direction in Arm Movements , 1990, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[11]  J. F. Soechting,et al.  An algorithm for the generation of curvilinear wrist motion in an arbitrary plane in three-dimensional space , 1986, Neuroscience.

[12]  S. Schaal,et al.  Segmentation of endpoint trajectories does not imply segmented control , 1999, Experimental Brain Research.

[13]  T. Flash,et al.  The coordination of arm movements: an experimentally confirmed mathematical model , 1985, The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience.

[14]  J. Soechting,et al.  Organization of arm movements in three-dimensional space. Wrist motion is piecewise planar , 1987, Neuroscience.

[15]  Michael I. Jordan,et al.  Smoothness maximization along a predefined path accurately predicts the speed profiles of complex arm movements. , 1998, Journal of neurophysiology.

[16]  T. Flash,et al.  Comparing Smooth Arm Movements with the Two-Thirds Power Law and the Related Segmented-Control Hypothesis , 2002, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[17]  Apostolos P. Georgopoulos,et al.  Three-dimensional drawings in isometric conditions: relation between geometry and kinematics , 2004, Experimental Brain Research.

[18]  Martha Flanders,et al.  Manual tracking in three dimensions , 2005, Experimental Brain Research.

[19]  F. Lacquaniti,et al.  Viewer-centered frame of reference for pointing to memorized targets in three-dimensional space. , 1997, Journal of neurophysiology.

[20]  R. Johansson,et al.  Action plans used in action observation , 2003, Nature.

[21]  J. F. Soechting,et al.  Moving effortlessly in three dimensions: does Donders' law apply to arm movement? , 1995, The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience.

[22]  Apostolos P. Georgopoulos,et al.  Three-dimensional drawings in isometric conditions: planar segmentation of force trajectory , 1992, Experimental Brain Research.

[23]  A. Wing,et al.  Relation between velocity and curvature in movement: equivalence and divergence between a power law and a minimum-jerk model. , 1988, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.