On Parameter Interpretability of Phenomenological-Based Semiphysical Models

Empirical and phenomenological based models are used to represent biological and physiological processes. Phenomenological models are derived from the knowledge of the mechanisms that underlie the behaviour of the system under study, while empirical models are derived from analysis of data to quantify relationships between variables of interest. For studying biological systems, the phenomenological modeling approach offers the great advantage of having a structure with variables and parameters with physical meaning that enhance the interpretability of the model and its further used for decision making. The interpretability property of models, however, remains a vague concept. In this study, we tackled the interpretability property for parameters of phenomenological-based models. To our knowledge, this property has not been deeply discussed, perhaps by the implicit assumption that interpretability is inherent to the phenomenological-based models. We propose a conceptual framework to address the parameter interpretability and its implications for parameter identifiability. We use as battle horse a simple but relevant model representing the enzymatic degradation of β–casein by a Lactococcus lactis bacterium.

[1]  Ted Poston,et al.  Explanation and Justification , 2014 .

[2]  G F Cooper,et al.  The use of misclassification costs to learn rule-based decision support models for cost-effective hospital admission strategies. , 1995, Proceedings. Symposium on Computer Applications in Medical Care.

[3]  Bart Baesens,et al.  An empirical evaluation of the comprehensibility of decision table, tree and rule based predictive models , 2011, Decis. Support Syst..

[4]  Chia-Feng Juang,et al.  Data-Driven Interval Type-2 Neural Fuzzy System With High Learning Accuracy and Improved Model Interpretability , 2013, IEEE Transactions on Cybernetics.

[5]  T. Dobre,et al.  Chemical engineering : modelling, simulation and similitude , 2007 .

[6]  R. Muñoz-Tamayo,et al.  Hydrolysis of β-casein by the cell-envelope-located PI-type protease of Lactococcus lactis: A modelling approach , 2011 .

[7]  H. Álvarez,et al.  A phenomenologically based material flow model for friction stir welding , 2016 .

[8]  Diran Basmadjian,et al.  The Art of Modeling in Science and Engineering with Mathematica , 1999 .

[9]  Thomas Richardson,et al.  Interpretable Boosted Naïve Bayes Classification , 1998, KDD.

[10]  Zachary Chase Lipton The mythos of model interpretability , 2016, ACM Queue.

[11]  Michael J. Chappell,et al.  Structural identifiability and indistinguishability analyses of the Minimal Model and a Euglycemic Hyperinsulinemic Clamp model for glucose-insulin dynamics , 2011, Comput. Methods Programs Biomed..

[12]  Been Kim,et al.  Interactive and interpretable machine learning models for human machine collaboration , 2015 .

[13]  Johannes Gehrke,et al.  Accurate intelligible models with pairwise interactions , 2013, KDD.

[14]  G. G. Stokes "J." , 1890, The New Yale Book of Quotations.

[15]  J. Banga,et al.  Structural Identifiability of Systems Biology Models: A Critical Comparison of Methods , 2011, PloS one.

[16]  Jakob F. Maier,et al.  Model granularity and related concepts , 2016 .

[17]  D Sauvant,et al.  Review: To be or not to be an identifiable model. Is this a relevant question in animal science modelling? , 2017, Animal : an international journal of animal bioscience.

[18]  Héctor Antonio Botero Castro,et al.  Enfrentando el modelado de bioprocesos: una revisión de las metodologías de modelado , 2017 .

[19]  Ian T. Cameron,et al.  Process Modelling and Model Analysis , 2013 .

[20]  Eric Walter,et al.  Identification of Parametric Models: from Experimental Data , 1997 .

[21]  Peter L. Bonate,et al.  The Art of Modeling , 2011 .

[22]  Johannes Gehrke,et al.  Intelligible models for classification and regression , 2012, KDD.

[23]  Siddhartha S. Srinivasa,et al.  Legibility and predictability of robot motion , 2013, 2013 8th ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction (HRI).

[24]  R. Tibshirani,et al.  Generalized Additive Models: Some Applications , 1987 .

[25]  Been Kim,et al.  Towards A Rigorous Science of Interpretable Machine Learning , 2017, 1702.08608.

[26]  Franco Turini,et al.  A Survey of Methods for Explaining Black Box Models , 2018, ACM Comput. Surv..

[27]  Bill Curtis,et al.  Process modeling , 1992, CACM.

[28]  Tsuyoshi Murata,et al.  {m , 1934, ACML.

[29]  Hernan Alvarez,et al.  Metodología para la Obtención de Modelos Semifísicos de Base Fenomenológica Aplicada a una Sulfitadora de Jugo de Caña de Azúcar , 2009 .

[30]  Juan Contreras Montes,et al.  Data-Driven Identification Algorithms for Automatic Determination of Interpretable Fuzzy Models , 2007 .

[31]  H. Pohjanpalo System identifiability based on the power series expansion of the solution , 1978 .

[32]  William L. Luyben,et al.  Process Modeling, Simulation and Control for Chemical Engineers , 1973 .

[33]  Maria Pia Saccomani,et al.  DAISY: A new software tool to test global identifiability of biological and physiological systems , 2007, Comput. Methods Programs Biomed..

[34]  Eva Balsa-Canto,et al.  Bioinformatics Applications Note Systems Biology Genssi: a Software Toolbox for Structural Identifiability Analysis of Biological Models , 2022 .