Undergraduate Students’ Profiles of Cognitive Load in Augmented Reality–Assisted Science Learning and Their Relation to Science Learning Self-efficacy and Behavior Patterns
暂无分享,去创建一个
[1] Yue Zhou,et al. Effects of a contextualised reflective mechanism-based augmented reality learning model on students’ scientific inquiry learning performances, behavioural patterns, and higher order thinking , 2022, Interact. Learn. Environ..
[2] Ching-Huei Chen,et al. Supporting informal science learning with metacognitive scaffolding and augmented reality: effects on science knowledge, intrinsic motivation, and cognitive load , 2022, Research in Science & Technological Education.
[3] Kan Kan Chan,et al. Effects of contextual interactive healthcare training on caregivers of patients with suspected COVID-19 infection: Anxiety, learning achievements, perceived support and self-efficacies during quarantine , 2022, J. Comput. Assist. Learn..
[4] Jiangxue Li,et al. AR Learning Environment Integrated with EIA Inquiry Model: Enhancing Scientific Literacy and Reducing Cognitive Load of Students , 2021, Sustainability.
[5] M. Kerres,et al. The impact of augmented reality on cognitive load and performance: A systematic review , 2021, J. Comput. Assist. Learn..
[6] Hsin Ning Jessie Ho,et al. The Interrelationship Among High School Students’ Conceptions of Learning Science, Self-Regulated Learning Science, and Science Learning Self-Efficacy , 2021, International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education.
[7] Sandra Y. Okita,et al. Exploring Differences in Student Learning and Behavior Between Real-life and Virtual Reality Chemistry Laboratories , 2021, Journal of Science Education and Technology.
[8] Andrew J. Martin,et al. Assessing Instructional Cognitive Load in the Context of Students' Psychological Challenge and Threat Orientations: A Multi-Level Latent Profile Analysis of Students and Classrooms , 2021, Frontiers in Psychology.
[9] Kate M. Xu,et al. Understanding Cognitive Load in Digital and Online Learning: a New Perspective on Extraneous Cognitive Load , 2021, Educational Psychology Review.
[10] Tzung-Jin Lin. Multi-dimensional explorations into the relationships between high school students’ science learning self-efficacy and engagement , 2021 .
[11] Sebastian Habig,et al. Cognitive Load Implications for Augmented Reality Supported Chemistry Learning , 2021, Inf..
[12] Kai-Yi Chin,et al. Effects of augmented reality technology in a mobile touring system on university students’ learning performance and interest , 2020, Australasian Journal of Educational Technology.
[13] T. Gog,et al. The Role of Mental Effort in Fostering Self-Regulated Learning with Problem-Solving Tasks , 2020, Educational Psychology Review.
[14] Paul Lukowicz,et al. Effects of augmented reality on learning and cognitive load in university physics laboratory courses , 2020, Comput. Hum. Behav..
[15] Chin-Chung Tsai,et al. Exploring the relationship between perceived technology-assisted teacher support and technology-embedded scientific inquiry: the mediation effect of hardiness , 2020, International Journal of Science Education.
[16] N. Fadl,et al. Science Learning in Augmented Reality Context: An Exploration of Learners’ Cognitive Load and Attitudes , 2020, International Journal of Instructional Technology and Educational Studies.
[17] Paul A. Kirschner,et al. Applying collaborative cognitive load theory to computer-supported collaborative learning: towards a research agenda , 2020, Educational Technology Research and Development.
[18] Rabia Meryem Yilmaz,et al. The effect of Augmented Reality Technology on middle school students' achievements and attitudes towards science education , 2020, Comput. Educ..
[19] M. Billinghurst,et al. Assessing the Relationship between Cognitive Load and the Usability of a Mobile Augmented Reality Tutorial System: A Study of Gender Effects , 2019, International Journal of Assessment Tools in Education.
[20] Jocelyn E. Bolin,et al. Multilevel Modeling Using R , 2019 .
[21] Yu-ching Chen. Effect of Mobile Augmented Reality on Learning Performance, Motivation, and Math Anxiety in a Math Course , 2019, Journal of Educational Computing Research.
[22] Hsin-Yu Lee,et al. Lessons learned from integrating concept mapping and gaming approaches into learning scenarios using mobile devices: analysis of an activity for a geology course , 2019, Int. J. Mob. Learn. Organisation.
[23] Silvia Baldiris,et al. Systematic review and meta-analysis of augmented reality in educational settings , 2019, Virtual Reality.
[24] Chin-Chung Tsai,et al. Investigating Students’ Conceptions of Technology-Assisted Science Learning: a Drawing Analysis , 2019, Journal of Science Education and Technology.
[25] Chih-Hung Chen,et al. An augmented reality-based learning approach to enhancing students' science reading performances from the perspective of the cognitive load theory , 2018, Br. J. Educ. Technol..
[26] Chng Eng Siong,et al. A Hybrid Deep Learning Architecture for Sentence Unit Detection , 2018, 2018 International Conference on Asian Language Processing (IALP).
[27] Gwo-Jen Hwang,et al. Impacts of an augmented reality-based flipped learning guiding approach on students' scientific project performance and perceptions , 2018, Comput. Educ..
[28] Luca Longo,et al. The Evolution of Cognitive Load Theory and the Measurement of Its Intrinsic, Extraneous and Germane Loads: A Review , 2018, H-WORKLOAD.
[29] Ting Fang,et al. Learning performance and cognitive load in mobile learning: Impact of interaction complexity , 2018, J. Comput. Assist. Learn..
[30] Athanasios Drigas,et al. Virtual and augmented reality effects on K-12, higher and tertiary education students’ twenty-first century skills , 2018, Virtual Reality.
[31] David F. Feldon,et al. Self-efficacy change associated with a cognitive load-based intervention in an undergraduate biology course , 2018, Learning and Instruction.
[32] Hsin-Kai Wu,et al. Students’ development of socio-scientific reasoning in a mobile augmented reality learning environment , 2018 .
[33] Gwo-Jen Hwang,et al. Impacts of integrating the repertory grid into an augmented reality-based learning design on students’ learning achievements, cognitive load and degree of satisfaction , 2018, Interact. Learn. Environ..
[34] Shao-Chen Chang,et al. Effects of integrating an active learning-promoting mechanism into location-based real-world learning environments on students’ learning performances and behaviors , 2017, Educational Technology Research and Development.
[35] Alexander Renkl,et al. Learning from direct instruction: Best prepared by several self-regulated or guided invention activities? , 2017 .
[36] Jocelyn E. Bolin,et al. Multilevel Modeling Using Mplus , 2017 .
[37] Murat Akcay,et al. Advantages and challenges associated with augmented reality for education : A systematic review of the literature , 2017 .
[38] Gwo-Jen Hwang,et al. A Prompt-Based Annotation Approach to Conducting Mobile Learning Activities for Architecture Design Courses , 2013, 2013 Second IIAI International Conference on Advanced Applied Informatics.
[39] Chris Dede,et al. Affordances and Limitations of Immersive Participatory Augmented Reality Simulations for Teaching and Learning , 2009 .
[40] Krista E. DeLeeuw,et al. A Comparison of Three Measures of Cognitive Load: Evidence for Separable Measures of Intrinsic, Extraneous, and Germane Load , 2008 .
[41] David F. Feldon,et al. Cognitive Load and Classroom Teaching: The Double-Edged Sword of Automaticity , 2007 .
[42] Richard E. Clark,et al. Why Minimal Guidance During Instruction Does Not Work: An Analysis of the Failure of Constructivist, Discovery, Problem-Based, Experiential, and Inquiry-Based Teaching , 2006 .
[43] H. Marsh,et al. In Search of Golden Rules: Comment on Hypothesis-Testing Approaches to Setting Cutoff Values for Fit Indexes and Dangers in Overgeneralizing Hu and Bentler's (1999) Findings , 2004 .
[44] F. Paas,et al. Cognitive Load Measurement as a Means to Advance Cognitive Load Theory , 2003 .
[45] D. Rubin,et al. Testing the number of components in a normal mixture , 2001 .
[46] David R. Anderson,et al. Model Selection and Inference: A Practical Information-Theoretic Approach , 2001 .
[47] Gavriel Salvendy,et al. Prediction of Mental Workload in Single and Multiple Tasks Environments , 2000 .
[48] F. Paas,et al. Instructional control of cognitive load in the training of complex cognitive tasks , 1994 .
[49] Robert H. Berk,et al. Observing Interaction: An Introduction to Sequential Analysis , 1992 .
[50] R. Lazarus. Psychological stress in the workplace. , 1989, Journal of UOEH.
[51] John Sweller,et al. Cognitive Load During Problem Solving: Effects on Learning , 1988, Cogn. Sci..
[52] G. Salomon. Television is "easy" and print is "tough": The differential investment of mental effort in learning as a function of perceptions and attributions. , 1984 .
[53] Cody Ding,et al. Latent Profile Analysis , 2018 .
[54] Slava Kalyuga,et al. Design Factors for Effective Science Simulations: Representation of Information , 2009, Int. J. Gaming Comput. Mediat. Simulations.
[55] J. Eccles,et al. Expectancy-Value Theory of Achievement Motivation. , 2000, Contemporary educational psychology.