Working memory’s workload capacity

We examined the role of dual-task interference in working memory using a novel dual two-back task that requires a redundant-target response (i.e., a response that neither the auditory nor the visual stimulus occurred two back versus a response that one or both occurred two back) on every trial. Comparisons with performance on single two-back trials (i.e., with only auditory or only visual stimuli) showed that dual-task demands reduced both speed and accuracy. Our task design enabled a novel application of Townsend and Nozawa’s (Journal of Mathematical Psychology 39: 321–359, 1995) workload capacity measure, which revealed that the decrement in dual two-back performance was mediated by the sharing of a limited amount of processing capacity. Relative to most other single and dual n-back tasks, performance measures for our task were more reliable, due to the use of a small stimulus set that induced a high and constant level of proactive interference. For a version of our dual two-back task that minimized response bias, accuracy was also more strongly correlated with complex span than has been found for most other single and dual n-back tasks.

[1]  Margarete Delazer,et al.  Sex differences in cognitive functions , 2003 .

[2]  Punit Shah.  Toward a Neurobiology of Unrealistic Optimism , 2012, Front. Psychology.

[3]  Ami Eidels,et al.  Where similarity beats redundancy: the importance of context, higher order similarity, and response assignment. , 2008, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[4]  Nelson Cowan,et al.  When visual and verbal memories compete: Evidence of cross-domain limits in working memory , 2004, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[5]  Joseph W. Houpt,et al.  Statistical measures for workload capacity analysis. , 2012, Journal of mathematical psychology.

[6]  Gil Gaudia.  Intelligence about Intelligence , 1973, The Elementary School Journal.

[7]  Elizabeth Hampson,et al.  A Sex Difference on a Novel Spatial Working Memory Task in Humans , 2001, Brain and Cognition.

[8]  Kathryn M. McMillan,et al.  N‐back working memory paradigm: A meta‐analysis of normative functional neuroimaging studies , 2005, Human brain mapping.

[9]  B. G. Rule,et al.  Adult age differences in working memory. , 1989, Psychology and aging.

[10]  Rick O. Gilmore,et al.  Developmental changes in encoding and the capacity to process face information. , 2011 .

[11]  Andrew Heathcote,et al.  Converging measures of workload capacity , 2010, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[12]  Thom Baguley,et al.  Calculating and graphing within-subject confidence intervals for ANOVA , 2012, Behavior research methods.

[13]  S. Phillips,et al.  Processing capacity defined by relational complexity: implications for comparative, developmental, and cognitive psychology. , 1998, The Behavioral and brain sciences.

[14]  James T. Townsend,et al.  An Assessment of Behavioral Dynamic Information Processing Measures in Audiovisual Speech Perception , 2011, Front. Psychology.

[15]  K. Oberauer.  Binding and inhibition in working memory: individual and age differences in short-term recognition. , 2005, Journal of experimental psychology. General.

[16]  Joseph W. Houpt,et al.  Assessing the speed--accuracy trade-off effect on the capacity of information processing. , 2014, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[17]  R. Catrambone,et al.  Proceedings of the 32nd Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society , 2010 .

[18]  Timothy A. Salthouse,et al.  The aging of working memory. , 1994 .

[19]  J. Townsend,et al.  Spatio-temporal properties of elementary perception: an investigation of parallel, serial, and coactive theories , 1995 .

[20]  Noah A. Shamosh,et al.  Individual Differences in Delay Discounting , 2008, Psychological science.

[21]  Andrew R. A. Conway,et al.  Journal of Experimental Psychology : General Neural Mechanisms of Interference Control Underlie the Relationship Between Fluid Intelligence and Working Memory Span , 2011 .

[22]  R. Engle,et al.  Is working memory capacity task dependent , 1989 .

[23]  Klaus Oberauer,et al.  Which Working Memory Functions Predict Intelligence , 2008 .

[24]  Joseph W. Houpt,et al.  Systems Factorial Technology provides new insights on global-local information processing in autism spectrum disorders. , 2010, Journal of mathematical psychology.

[25]  David L. Strayer,et al.  Supertaskers and the Multitasking Brain , 2012 .

[26]  Roger Ratcliff,et al.  Aging and response times: a comparison of sequential sampling models , 2005 .

[27]  Diane F. Halpern,et al.  Sex differences in visuospatial working memory: Components of cognitive processing , 1999, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[28]  L. Wasserman,et al.  Computing Bayes Factors by Combining Simulation and Asymptotic Approximations , 1997 .

[29]  E. Wagenmakers.  A practical solution to the pervasive problems ofp values , 2007, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[30]  Questioning Anecdotal Beliefs and Scientific Findings , 2013 .

[31]  Timo Mäntylä,et al.  Gender Differences in Multitasking Reflect Spatial Ability , 2013, Psychological science.

[32]  R. Engle.  Working Memory Capacity as Executive Attention , 2002 .

[33]  Michael J Wenger,et al.  A strong test of the dual-mode hypothesis , 2005, Perception & psychophysics.

[34]  C. Chabris,et al.  Neural mechanisms of general fluid intelligence , 2003, Nature Neuroscience.

[35]  Adam Chuderski,et al.  When are fluid intelligence and working memory isomorphic and when are they not , 2013 .

[36]  D. Strayer,et al.  Supertaskers: Profiles in extraordinary multitasking ability , 2010, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[37]  R. Shiffrin,et al.  Controlled and automatic human information processing: I , 1977 .

[38]  H. Müller,et al.  The detection of feature singletons defined in two dimensions is based on salience summation, rather than on serial exhaustive or interactive race architectures , 2009, Attention, perception & psychophysics.

[39]  Ami Eidels,et al.  Evaluating perceptual integration: uniting response-time- and accuracy-based methodologies , 2015, Attention, perception & psychophysics.

[40]  James T Townsend,et al.  Consequences of Base Time for Redundant Signals Experiments. , 2007, Journal of mathematical psychology.

[41]  H Stanislaw,et al.  Calculation of signal detection theory measures , 1999, Behavior research methods, instruments, & computers : a journal of the Psychonomic Society, Inc.

[42]  Walter Schneider,et al.  Controlled and automatic human information processing: II. Perceptual learning, automatic attending and a general theory. , 1977 .

[43]  Lawrence,et al.  QUANTITATIVE RESPONSE TIME TECHNOLOGY FOR MEASURING COGNITIVE , PROCESSING CAPACITY IN CLINICAL STUDIES , 2007 .

[44]  B. Underwood,et al.  Proactive inhibition in short-term retention of single items , 1962 .

[45]  D. Kahneman,et al.  Attention and Effort , 1973 .

[46]  L. F. Barrett,et al.  Individual differences in working memory capacity and dual-process theories of the mind. , 2004, Psychological bulletin.

[47]  Susanne M. Jaeggi,et al.  On how high performers keep cool brains in situations of cognitive overload , 2007, Cognitive, affective & behavioral neuroscience.

[48]  N. Cowan.  The magical number 4 in short-term memory: A reconsideration of mental storage capacity , 2001, Behavioral and Brain Sciences.

[49]  A. Raftery.  Bayesian Model Selection in Social Research , 1995 .

[50]  B. Gibson,et al.  Using hazard functions to assess changes in processing capacity in an attentional cuing paradigm. , 2004, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[51]  S. Jaeggi,et al.  The concurrent validity of the N-back task as a working memory measure , 2010, Memory.

[52]  Christopher D. Wickens,et al.  The Structure of Attentional Resources , 1980 .

[53]  R. Conrad,et al.  Acoustic confusions in immediate memory. , 1964 .

[54]  Edgar F. Borgatta,et al.  Sociological Methodology, 1969. , 1969 .

[55]  Philip L. Smith,et al.  A comparison of sequential sampling models for two-choice reaction time. , 2004, Psychological review.

[56]  W. R. Garner.  The Processing of Information and Structure , 1974 .

[57]  Andrew Heathcote,et al.  Multi-tasking in Working Memory , 2014 .

[58]  Nelson Cowan,et al.  When do visual and verbal memories compete , 2004 .

[59]  James T. Townsend,et al.  Comparing perception of Stroop stimuli in focused versus divided attention paradigms: Evidence for dramatic processing differences , 2010, Cognition.

[60]  Richard P. Heitz,et al.  An automated version of the operation span task , 2005, Behavior research methods.

[61]  Jeffrey N. Rouder,et al.  Default Bayes factors for ANOVA designs , 2012 .

[62]  Jeffrey N. Rouder,et al.  Bayes factor approaches for testing interval null hypotheses. , 2011, Psychological methods.

[63]  Richard D. Morey,et al.  Confidence Intervals from Normalized Data: A correction to Cousineau (2005) , 2008 .

[64]  Susanne M. Jaeggi,et al.  Improving fluid intelligence with training on working memory: a meta-analysis , 2008, Psychonomic Bulletin & Review.

[65]  Heike Schmidt,et al.  No gender differences in brain activation during the N‐back task: An fMRI study in healthy individuals , 2009, Human brain mapping.

[66]  Susanne M. Jaeggi,et al.  The Relationship between N-Back Performance and Matrix Reasoning--Implications for Training and Transfer. , 2010 .

[67]  J. Hyde,et al.  The Gender Similarities Hypothesis , 2005 .

[68]  Joseph W. Houpt,et al.  A new perspective on visual word processing efficiency. , 2014, Acta psychologica.

[69]  N. Donnelly,et al.  An examination of the processing capacity of features in the Thatcher illusion , 2012, Attention, perception & psychophysics.

[70]  M. Wenger,et al.  Processing capacity under perceptual and cognitive load: a closer look at load theory. , 2011, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[71]  K. Oberauer.  Access to information in working memory: exploring the focus of attention. , 2002, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[72]  Joseph W. Houpt,et al.  Functional principal components analysis of workload capacity functions , 2013, Behavior research methods.

[73]  Andrew R. A. Conway,et al.  Working memory capacity and its relation to general intelligence , 2003, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[74]  Raymond S. Nickerson,et al.  Attention and Performance Viii , 2014 .

[75]  E. Elliott,et al.  A Comparison of Laboratory and Clinical Working Memory Tests and Their Prediction of Fluid Intelligence. , 2009, Intelligence.

[76]  A. Gazzaley,et al.  Distinct mechanisms for the impact of distraction and interruption on working memory in aging , 2012, Neurobiology of Aging.

[77]  J. Townsend,et al.  An accuracy-response time capacity assessment function that measures performance against standard parallel predictions. , 2012, Psychological review.

[78]  David L. Strayer,et al.  Gender Invariance in Multitasking , 2013, Psychological science.

[79]  B McElree,et al.  Working memory and focal attention. , 2001, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[80]  J. Townsend,et al.  On the costs and benefits of faces and words: process characteristics of feature search in highly meaningful stimuli. , 2006, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[81]  Andrew R. A. Conway,et al.  Working memory, attention control, and the N-back task: a question of construct validity. , 2007, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[82]  Michael F. Bunting,et al.  Working memory span tasks: A methodological review and user’s guide , 2005, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[83]  J. Townsend,et al.  Workload capacity spaces: A unified methodology for response time measures of efficiency as workload is varied , 2011, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[84]  Daniel J. Acheson,et al.  Increased Alpha-Band Power during the Retention of Shapes and Shape-Location Associations in Visual Short-Term Memory , 2011, Front. Psychology.

[85]  David L. Strayer,et al.  On Supertaskers and the Neural Basis of Efficient Multitasking , 2015, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[86]  Scott D. Brown,et al.  The simplest complete model of choice response time: Linear ballistic accumulation , 2008, Cognitive Psychology.

[87]  Joseph W. Houpt,et al.  Systems factorial technology with R , 2014, Behavior research methods.

[88]  Susanne M. Jaeggi,et al.  Does excessive memory load attenuate activation in the prefrontal cortex? Load-dependent processing in single and dual tasks: functional magnetic resonance imaging study , 2003, NeuroImage.

[89]  H. Jeffreys.  A Treatise on Probability , 1922, Nature.

[90]  J. Townsend,et al.  A theory of interactive parallel processing: new capacity measures and predictions for a response time inequality series. , 2004, Psychological review.

[91]  Shu-Chen Li,et al.  Interference and facilitation in spatial working memory: age-associated differences in lure effects in the n-back paradigm. , 2009, Psychology and aging.

[92]  Ulman Lindenberger,et al.  Complex span versus updating tasks of working memory: the gap is not that deep. , 2009, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.