Consonance and dissonance in descriptions of teaching of university teachers

Studies on teachers' approaches to teaching have identified two qualitatively different categories of approaches. The learning-focused approach is about teaching as facilitating students' learning and learning as knowledge construction, while the content-focused approach concerns teaching as transmission of knowledge and learning as absorbing the transmitted information. The aim of the present study is to explore consonance and dissonance in the kinds of combinations of approaches to teaching that university teachers adopt. Ninety-seven academics from a wide variety of disciplines were interviewed. The themes of the interviews dealt broadly with issues related to teaching in higher education. The results showed that some teachers were clearly and systematically either learning or content focused. On the other hand, profiles of some teachers consisted of combinations of learning and content focused approaches or conceptions, making their profiles dissonant. Three types of dissonance were identified. Explanations for the dissonance and implications of dissonant and consonant teaching profiles are discussed.

[1]  K. Trigwell,et al.  How approaches to teaching are affected by discipline and teaching context , 2006 .

[2]  J. Vermunt,et al.  Congruence and friction between learning and teaching , 1999 .

[3]  Sari Lindblom-Yla¨Nne.  Broadening an Understanding of the Phenomenon of Dissonance , 2003 .

[4]  Katherine Samuelowicz,et al.  Conceptions of teaching held by academic teachers , 1992 .

[5]  John T. E. Richardson,et al.  Students’ Approaches to Learning and Teachers’ Approaches to Teaching in Higher Education , 2005 .

[6]  Michael Prosser,et al.  Congruence between intention and strategy in university science teachers' approaches to teaching , 1996 .

[7]  D. Kember.  A reconceptualisation of the research into university academics' conceptions of teaching , 1997 .

[8]  Anne Nevgi,et al.  The effect of pedagogical training on teaching in higher education , 2007 .

[9]  F. Cano.  Consonance and dissonance in students' learning experience , 2005 .

[10]  Mark Rickinson,et al.  Formative evaluation of accredited programmes , 2006 .

[11]  K. Trigwell,et al.  Relations between perceptions of the teaching environment and approaches to teaching. , 1997, The British journal of educational psychology.

[12]  K. Trigwell,et al.  Changing approaches to teaching: A relational perspective , 1996 .

[13]  K. Trigwell,et al.  Relations between teachers' approaches to teaching and students' approaches to learning , 1999 .

[14]  David Kember,et al.  Lecturers’ Approaches to Teaching and their Relationship to Conceptions of Good Teaching , 2000 .

[15]  Elaine Martin,et al.  Dissonance in Experience of Teaching and its Relation to the Quality of Student Learning , 2003 .

[16]  Kirsti Lonka,et al.  Individual Ways of Interacting with the Learning Environment--Are They Related to Study Success?. , 1998 .

[17]  Katherine Samuelowicz,et al.  Revisiting academics' beliefs about teaching and learning , 2001 .

[18]  Jan H. F. Meyer.  The modelling of ‘dissonant’ study orchestration in higher education , 2000 .

[19]  Mavis Kelly,et al.  The conceptual change approach to improving teaching and learning: An evaluation of a Hong Kong staff development programme , 2001 .

[20]  Gerlese S. Åkerlind.  Growing and Developing as a University Teacher--Variation in Meaning , 2003 .

[21]  K. Trigwell,et al.  Understanding Learning and Teaching: the experience in higher education , 1999 .

[22]  Kirsti Lonka,et al.  Dissonant study orchestrations of high-achieving university students , 2000 .

[23]  G. Lueckenhausen,et al.  How university teaching changes teachers: Affective as well as cognitive challenges , 2005 .

[24]  Graham Gibbs,et al.  The Impact Of Training Of University Teachers on their Teaching Skills, their Approach to Teaching and the Approach to Learning of their Students , 2004 .

[25]  Elizabeth Hazel,et al.  Students’ experiences of studying physics concepts: The effects of disintegrated perceptions and approaches , 2000 .

[26]  A. Biglan.  Relationships between subject matter characteristics and the structure and output of university departments. , 1973 .

[27]  Noel Entwistle,et al.  Conceptions and Beliefs About “Good Teaching”: An integration of contrasting research areas , 2000 .

[28]  G. Lueddeke,et al.  Professionalising Teaching Practice in Higher Education: A study of disciplinary variation and 'teaching-scholarship' , 2003 .

[29]  Liisa Postareff,et al.  Variation in teachers' descriptions of teaching: Broadening the understanding of teaching in higher education , 2008 .

[30]  Philip Taylor,et al.  A phenomenographic study of academics' conceptions of science learning and teaching , 1994 .

[31]  M. G. Eley,et al.  Teachers’ Conceptions of Teaching, and the Making of Specific Decisions in Planning to Teach , 2006 .

[32]  Thomas R. Guskey,et al.  Evaluating professional development , 1999 .