Trajectory sensitivity of the transient climate response to cumulative carbon emissions

The robustness of Transient Climate Response to cumulative Emissions (TCRE) is tested using an Earth System Model (Geophysical Fluid Dynamics Laboratory-ESM2G) forced with seven different constant rates of carbon emissions (2 GtC/yr to 25 GtC/yr), including low emission rates that have been largely unexplored in previous studies. We find the range of TCRE resulting from varying emission pathways to be 0.76 to 1.04°C/TtC. This range, however, is small compared to the uncertainty resulting from varying model physics across the Fifth Coupled Model Intercomparison Project ensemble. TCRE has a complex relationship with emission rates; TCRE is largest for both low (2 GtC/yr) and high (25 GtC/yr) emissions and smallest for present-day emissions (5–10 GtC/yr). Unforced climate variability hinders precise estimates of TCRE for periods shorter than 50 years for emission rates near or smaller than present day values. Even if carbon emissions would stop, the prior emissions pathways will affect the future climate responses.

[1]  Ken Caldeira,et al.  Stabilizing climate requires near‐zero emissions , 2008 .

[2]  Christopher B. Field,et al.  Changes in Ecologically Critical Terrestrial Climate Conditions , 2013, Science.

[3]  N. Gillett,et al.  Is the climate response to CO2 emissions path dependent? , 2012 .

[4]  T. Stocker,et al.  Impact of delay in reducing carbon dioxide emissions , 2014 .

[5]  Elena Shevliakova,et al.  Historical warming reduced due to enhanced land carbon uptake , 2013, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[6]  H. Damon Matthews,et al.  The proportionality of global warming to cumulative carbon emissions , 2009, Nature.

[7]  T. Delworth,et al.  Probing the Fast and Slow Components of Global Warming by Returning Abruptly to Preindustrial Forcing , 2010 .

[8]  Thomas L. Frölicher,et al.  Continued global warming after CO 2 emissions stoppage , 2014 .

[9]  A. Thomson,et al.  The representative concentration pathways: an overview , 2011 .

[10]  S. Manabe,et al.  Response of a Coupled Ocean–Atmosphere Model to Increasing Atmospheric Carbon Dioxide: Sensitivity to the Rate of Increase , 1999 .

[11]  K. Caldeira,et al.  Quantifying the effects of CO2‐fertilized vegetation on future global climate and carbon dynamics , 2004 .

[12]  Andrew Macintosh,et al.  Keeping warming within the 2 °C limit after Copenhagen , 2010 .

[13]  Pierre Friedlingstein,et al.  Twenty-First-Century Compatible CO2 Emissions and Airborne Fraction Simulated by CMIP5 Earth System Models under Four Representative Concentration Pathways , 2013, Journal of Climate.

[14]  Corinne Le Quéré,et al.  Carbon emissions from land use and land-cover change , 2012 .

[15]  S. Klein,et al.  GFDL's CM2 Global Coupled Climate Models. Part I: Formulation and Simulation Characteristics , 2006 .

[16]  Ronald,et al.  GFDL’s ESM2 Global Coupled Climate–Carbon Earth System Models. Part I: Physical Formulation and Baseline Simulation Characteristics , 2012 .

[17]  Alvaro Montenegro,et al.  Lifetime of Anthropogenic Climate Change: Millennial Time Scales of Potential CO2 and Surface Temperature Perturbations , 2009 .

[18]  N. Meinshausen,et al.  Warming caused by cumulative carbon emissions towards the trillionth tonne , 2009, Nature.

[19]  Alice Bows,et al.  Beyond ‘dangerous’ climate change: emission scenarios for a new world , 2011, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences.

[20]  Myles R. Allen,et al.  Constraining the Ratio of Global Warming to Cumulative CO2 Emissions Using CMIP5 Simulations , 2013 .

[21]  R. Stouffer,et al.  Influence of Ocean and Atmosphere Components on Simulated Climate Sensitivities , 2013 .

[22]  Karl E. Taylor,et al.  An overview of CMIP5 and the experiment design , 2012 .