On the Complexity of Strong and Epistemic Credal Networks

Credal networks are graph-based statistical models whose parameters take values in a set, instead of being sharply specified as in traditional statistical models (e.g., Bayesian networks). The computational complexity of inferences on such models depends on the irrelevance/independence concept adopted. In this paper, we study inferential complexity under the concepts of epistemic irrelevance and strong independence. We show that inferences under strong independence are NP-hard even in trees with ternary variables. We prove that under epistemic irrelevance the polynomial time complexity of inferences in credal trees is not likely to extend to more general models (e.g. singly connected networks). These results clearly distinguish networks that admit efficient inferences and those where inferences are most likely hard, and settle several open questions regarding computational complexity.

[1]  Fabio Gagliardi Cozman,et al.  Credal networks , 2000, Artif. Intell..

[2]  Gert de Cooman,et al.  Coherent lower previsions in systems modelling: products and aggregation rules , 2004, Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf..

[3]  Marco Zaffalon,et al.  Credal networks for military identification problems , 2009, Int. J. Approx. Reason..

[4]  Judea Pearl,et al.  Probabilistic reasoning in intelligent systems - networks of plausible inference , 1991, Morgan Kaufmann series in representation and reasoning.

[5]  David S. Johnson,et al.  Computers and In stractability: A Guide to the Theory of NP-Completeness. W. H Freeman, San Fran , 1979 .

[6]  J. Meigs,et al.  WHO Technical Report , 1954, The Yale Journal of Biology and Medicine.

[7]  Marco Zaffalon,et al.  Building Knowledge-based Systems by Credal Networks: a Tutorial , 2010 .

[8]  David S. Johnson,et al.  Computers and Intractability: A Guide to the Theory of NP-Completeness , 1978 .

[9]  Cassio Polpo de Campos Proceedings of the Twenty-Second International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence New Complexity Results for MAP in Bayesian Networks , 2022 .

[10]  Fabio Gagliardi Cozman,et al.  Propositional and Relational Bayesian Networks Associated with Imprecise and Qualitat , 2004, UAI.

[11]  Marco Zaffalon,et al.  Credal Networks for Operational Risk Measurement and Management , 2007, KES.

[12]  P. Walley Statistical Reasoning with Imprecise Probabilities , 1990 .

[13]  Marco Zaffalon,et al.  Robust Filtering Through Coherent Lower Previsions , 2011, IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control.

[14]  Fabio Gagliardi Cozman,et al.  The Inferential Complexity of Bayesian and Credal Networks , 2005, IJCAI.

[15]  Enrico Fagiuoli,et al.  2U: An Exact Interval Propagation Algorithm for Polytrees with Binary Variables , 1998, Artif. Intell..

[16]  A. Darwiche,et al.  Complexity Results and Approximation Strategies for MAP Explanations , 2011, J. Artif. Intell. Res..

[17]  Johan Kwisthout,et al.  The Computational Complexity of Sensitivity Analysis and Parameter Tuning , 2008, UAI.

[18]  Marco Zaffalon,et al.  Conservative Inference Rule for Uncertain Reasoning under Incompleteness , 2009, J. Artif. Intell. Res..

[19]  Gert de Cooman,et al.  Epistemic irrelevance in credal nets: The case of imprecise Markov trees , 2010, Int. J. Approx. Reason..

[20]  Denis Deratani Mauá,et al.  Updating credal networks is approximable in polynomial time , 2012, Int. J. Approx. Reason..

[21]  Marco Zaffalon,et al.  Equivalence Between Bayesian and Credal Nets on an Updating Problem , 2006, SMPS.

[22]  Alessandro Antonucci,et al.  Modeling Unreliable Observations in Bayesian Networks by Credal Networks , 2009, SUM.

[23]  Nir Friedman,et al.  Probabilistic Graphical Models , 2009, Data-Driven Computational Neuroscience.

[24]  Denis Deratani Mauá,et al.  Solving Limited Memory Influence Diagrams , 2011, J. Artif. Intell. Res..

[25]  Erik Quaeghebeur,et al.  Characterizing the Set of Coherent Lower Previsions with a Finite Number of Constraints or Vertices , 2010, UAI.

[26]  Isaac Levi,et al.  The Enterprise Of Knowledge , 1980 .